Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Charles W. Moad

dblp:93/733 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 61% High-performance computing · 30% Cloud and datacenter computing · 9%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Services computing and microservices
web services
0.112005
Building Grid Portal Applications From a Web Service Component Architecture · Proc. IEEE 2005
Distributed systems
grid computing
0.112005
Building Grid Portal Applications From a Web Service Component Architecture · Proc. IEEE 2005
Distributed systems › grid computing
science gateway
0.112005
Building Grid Portal Applications From a Web Service Component Architecture · Proc. IEEE 2005
High-performance computing
scientific workflow
0.112005
Building Grid Portal Applications From a Web Service Component Architecture · Proc. IEEE 2005
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.012005
Building Grid Portal Applications From a Web Service Component Architecture · Proc. IEEE 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workflow composition · 0.1service wrapping · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Building Grid Portal Applications From a Web Service Component Architecture
abstract
This work describes an approach to building Grid applications based on the premise that users who wish to access and run these applications prefer to do so without becoming experts on Grid technology. We describe an application architecture based on wrapping user applications and application workflows as Web services and Web service resources. These services are visible to the users and to resource providers through a family of Grid portal components that can be used to configure, launch, and monitor complex applications in the scientific language of the end user. The applications in this model are instantiated by an application factory service. The layered design of the architecture makes it possible for an expert to configure an application factory service with a custom user interface client that may be dynamically loaded into the portal.
Dennis Gannon, Jay Alameda, Octav Chipara, Marcus Christie, Vinayak Dukle, Matthew Farrellee, Gopi Kandaswamy, Deepti Kodeboyina, Sriram Krishnan, Charles W. Moad, Marlon E. Pierce, Beth Plale, Albert L. Rossi, Yogesh L. Simmhan, Anuraag Sarangi, Aleksander Slominski, Satoshi Shirasuna, Thomas Thomas
Proc. IEEE11
2004 Understanding Grid resource information management through a synthetic database benchmark/workload
abstract
Management of Grid resource information is a challenging, and important area considering the potential size of the Grid and wide range of resources that should be represented. Though example Grid Information Servers exist, behavior of these servers across different platforms is less well understood. This paper describes a study we undertook to compare the access language and platform capabilities for three different database platforms, relational, native XML, and LDAP, serving as a Grid information server. Our study measures query response times for a range of queries and highlights sensitivities exhibited by the different platforms to variables such as result set size and collection size.
Beth Plale, Craig Jacobs, Scott Jensen, Ying Liu 0043, Charles W. Moad, Rupali Parab, Prajakta Vaidya
CCGRID5