Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

David Pfau

dblp:93/8411 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0834-8653ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 5 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
11 papers
Reinforcement learning · 41% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods
0.912025
Wasserstein Policy Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control
0.912025
Wasserstein Policy Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.912025
Wasserstein Policy Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.912025
Wasserstein Policy Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention
0.712023
A Self-Attention Ansatz for Ab-initio Quantum Chemistry · ICLR 2023
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
quantum chemistry
0.712023
A Self-Attention Ansatz for Ab-initio Quantum Chemistry · ICLR 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning
0.612022
Making Sense of Raw Input (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2022
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.612022
Making Sense of Raw Input (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.412020
Disentangling by Subspace Diffusion · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning
0.412020
Disentangling by Subspace Diffusion · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › efficient diffusion model
subspace diffusion model
0.412020
Disentangling by Subspace Diffusion · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
spectral learning
0.412019
Spectral Inference Networks: Unifying Deep and Spectral Learning · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.312017
Unrolled Generative Adversarial Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.332015
Probabilistic Deterministic Infinite Automata · NIPS 2010
Forgetting Counts: Constant Memory Inference for a Dependent Hierarchical Pitman-Yor Process · ICML 2010
Bayesian Nonparametric Methods for Partially-Observable Reinforcement Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
gradient-based meta-learning
0.212016
Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learned optimizer
0.212016
Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.212016
Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning
0.212015
Bayesian Nonparametric Methods for Partially-Observable Reinforcement Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.212013
Robust learning of low-dimensional dynamics from large neural ensembles · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
latent dynamical system
0.212013
Robust learning of low-dimensional dynamics from large neural ensembles · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model › pitman-yor process
hierarchical pitman-yor process
0.112010
Forgetting Counts: Constant Memory Inference for a Dependent Hierarchical Pitman-Yor Process · ICML 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
pitman-yor process
0.112010
Forgetting Counts: Constant Memory Inference for a Dependent Hierarchical Pitman-Yor Process · ICML 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
probabilistic automaton
0.112010
Probabilistic Deterministic Infinite Automata · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.112010
Forgetting Counts: Constant Memory Inference for a Dependent Hierarchical Pitman-Yor Process · ICML 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 1.7logic program · 1.7SAT solving · 1.7variational monte carlo · 1.3self-attention · 1.3wasserstein gradient flow · 0.9actor-critic · 0.9lie group theory · 0.4diffusion · 0.4de rham decomposition · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Wasserstein Policy Optimization
abstract
We introduce Wasserstein Policy Optimization (WPO), an actor-critic algorithm for reinforcement learning in continuous action spaces. WPO can be derived as an approximation to Wasserstein gradient flow over the space of all policies projected into a finite-dimensional parameter space (e.g., the weights of a neural network), leading to a simple and completely general closed-form update. The resulting algorithm combines many properties of deterministic and classic policy gradient methods. Like deterministic policy gradients, it exploits knowledge of the *gradient* of the action-value function with respect to the action. Like classic policy gradients, it can be applied to stochastic policies with arbitrary distributions over actions -- without using the reparameterization trick. We show results on the DeepMind Control Suite and a magnetic confinement fusion task which compare favorably with state-of-the-art continuous control methods.
David Pfau, Ian Davies, Diana Borsa, João G. M. Araújo, Brendan D. Tracey, Hado van Hasselt
ICML1
2023 A Self-Attention Ansatz for Ab-initio Quantum Chemistry
Ingrid von Glehn, James S. Spencer, David Pfau
ICLR3
2022 Making Sense of Raw Input (Extended Abstract)
abstract
How should a machine intelligence perform unsupervised structure discovery over streams of sensory input? One approach to this problem is to cast it as an apperception task. Here, the task is to construct an explicit interpretable theory that both explains the sensory sequence and also satisfies a set of unity conditions, designed to ensure that the constituents of the theory are connected in a relational structure. However, the original formulation of the apperception task had one fundamental limitation: it assumed the raw sensory input had already been parsed using a set of discrete categories, so that all the system had to do was receive this already-digested symbolic input, and make sense of it. But what if we don't have access to pre-parsed input? What if our sensory sequence is raw unprocessed information? The central contribution of this paper is a neuro-symbolic framework for distilling interpretable theories out of streams of raw, unprocessed sensory experience. First, we extend the definition of the apperception task to include ambiguous (but still symbolic) input: sequences of sets of disjunctions. Next, we use a neural network to map raw sensory input to disjunctive input. Our binary neural network is encoded as a logic program, so the weights of the network and the rules of the theory can be solved jointly as a single SAT problem. This way, we are able to jointly learn how to perceive (mapping raw sensory information to concepts) and apperceive (combining concepts into declarative rules).
Richard Evans 0001, Matko Bosnjak, Lars Buesing, Kevin Ellis, David Pfau, Pushmeet Kohli, Marek J. Sergot
IJCAI5
2020 Disentangling by Subspace Diffusion
abstract
We present a novel nonparametric algorithm for symmetry-based disentangling of data manifolds, the Geometric Manifold Component Estimator (GEOMANCER). GEOMANCER provides a partial answer to the question posed by Higgins et al.(2018): is it possible to learn how to factorize a Lie group solely from observations of the orbit of an object it acts on? We show that fully unsupervised factorization of a data manifold is possible if the true metric of the manifold is known and each factor manifold has nontrivial holonomy – for example, rotation in 3D. Our algorithm works by estimating the subspaces that are invariant under random walk diffusion, giving an approximation to the de Rham decomposition from differential geometry. We demonstrate the efficacy of GEOMANCER on several complex synthetic manifolds. Our work reduces the question of whether unsupervised disentangling is possible to the question of whether unsupervised metric learning is possible, providing a unifying insight into the geometric nature of representation learning.
David Pfau, Irina Higgins, Aleksandar Botev, Sébastien Racanière
NeurIPS1
2019 Spectral Inference Networks: Unifying Deep and Spectral Learning
David Pfau, Stig Petersen, Ashish Agarwal, David G. T. Barrett, Kimberly L. Stachenfeld
ICLR (Poster)1
2017 Unrolled Generative Adversarial Networks
Luke Metz, Ben Poole, David Pfau, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein
ICLR (Poster)3
2016 Convolution by Evolution: Differentiable Pattern Producing Networks
abstract
In this work we introduce a differentiable version of the Compositional Pattern Producing Network, called the DPPN. Unlike a standard CPPN, the topology of a DPPN is evolved but the weights are learned. A Lamarckian algorithm, that combines evolution and learning, produces DPPNs to reconstruct an image. Our main result is that DPPNs can be evolved/trained to compress the weights of a denoising autoencoder from 157684 to roughly 200 parameters, while achieving a reconstruction accuracy comparable to a fully connected network with more than two orders of magnitude more parameters. The regularization ability of the DPPN allows it to rediscover (approximate) convolutional network architectures embedded within a fully connected architecture. Such convolutional architectures are the current state of the art for many computer vision applications, so it is satisfying that DPPNs are capable of discovering this structure rather than having to build it in by design. DPPNs exhibit better generalization when tested on the Omniglot dataset after being trained on MNIST, than directly encoded fully connected autoencoders. DPPNs are therefore a new framework for integrating learning and evolution.
Chrisantha Fernando, Dylan Banarse, Malcolm Reynolds, Frederic Besse, David Pfau, Max Jaderberg, Marc Lanctot, Daan Wierstra
GECCO5
2016 Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent
abstract
The move from hand-designed features to learned features in machine learning has been wildly successful. In spite of this, optimization algorithms are still designed by hand. In this paper we show how the design of an optimization algorithm can be cast as a learning problem, allowing the algorithm to learn to exploit structure in the problems of interest in an automatic way. Our learned algorithms, implemented by LSTMs, outperform generic, hand-designed competitors on the tasks for which they are trained, and also generalize well to new tasks with similar structure. We demonstrate this on a number of tasks, including simple convex problems, training neural networks, and styling images with neural art.
Marcin Andrychowicz, Misha Denil, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Matt Hoffman 0001, David Pfau, Tom Schaul, Nando de Freitas
NIPS5
2015 Bayesian Nonparametric Methods for Partially-Observable Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Making intelligent decisions from incomplete information is critical in many applications: for example, robots must choose actions based on imperfect sensors, and speech-based interfaces must infer a user's needs from noisy microphone inputs. What makes these tasks hard is that often we do not have a natural representation with which to model the domain and use for choosing actions; we must learn about the domain's properties while simultaneously performing the task. Learning a representation also involves trade-offs between modeling the data that we have seen previously and being able to make predictions about new data. This article explores learning representations of stochastic systems using Bayesian nonparametric statistics. Bayesian nonparametric methods allow the sophistication of a representation to scale gracefully with the complexity in the data. Our main contribution is a careful empirical evaluation of how representations learned using Bayesian nonparametric methods compare to other standard learning approaches, especially in support of planning and control. We show that the Bayesian aspects of the methods result in achieving state-of-the-art performance in decision making with relatively few samples, while the nonparametric aspects often result in fewer computations. These results hold across a variety of different techniques for choosing actions given a representation.
Finale Doshi-Velez, David Pfau, Frank D. Wood, Nicholas Roy
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2013 Robust learning of low-dimensional dynamics from large neural ensembles
abstract
Recordings from large populations of neurons make it possible to search for hypothesized low-dimensional dynamics. Finding these dynamics requires models that take into account biophysical constraints and can be fit efficiently and robustly. Here, we present an approach to dimensionality reduction for neural data that is convex, does not make strong assumptions about dynamics, does not require averaging over many trials and is extensible to more complex statistical models that combine local and global influences. The results can be combined with spectral methods to learn dynamical systems models. The basic method can be seen as an extension of PCA to the exponential family using nuclear norm minimization. We evaluate the effectiveness of this method using an exact decomposition of the Bregman divergence that is analogous to variance explained for PCA. We show on model data that the parameters of latent linear dynamical systems can be recovered, and that even if the dynamics are not stationary we can still recover the true latent subspace. We also demonstrate an extension of nuclear norm minimization that can separate sparse local connections from global latent dynamics. Finally, we demonstrate improved prediction on real neural data from monkey motor cortex compared to fitting linear dynamical models without nuclear norm smoothing.
David Pfau, Eftychios A. Pnevmatikakis, Liam Paninski
NIPS1
2010 Forgetting Counts: Constant Memory Inference for a Dependent Hierarchical Pitman-Yor Process
Nicholas Bartlett, David Pfau, Frank D. Wood
ICML2
2010 Probabilistic Deterministic Infinite Automata
abstract
We propose a novel Bayesian nonparametric approach to learning with probabilistic deterministic finite automata (PDFA). We define and develop and sampler for a PDFA with an infinite number of states which we call the probabilistic deterministic infinite automata (PDIA). Posterior predictive inference in this model, given a finite training sequence, can be interpreted as averaging over multiple PDFAs of varying structure, where each PDFA is biased towards having few states. We suggest that our method for averaging over PDFAs is a novel approach to predictive distribution smoothing. We test PDIA inference both on PDFA structure learning and on both natural language and DNA data prediction tasks. The results suggest that the PDIA presents an attractive compromise between the computational cost of hidden Markov models and the storage requirements of hierarchically smoothed Markov models.
David Pfau, Nicholas Bartlett, Frank D. Wood
NIPS1