Oliver Popov

dblp:93/8812 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6176-6817ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 5 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Security Engineering in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Systematic Review of Methodological Approaches
Elias Seid, Oliver Popov, Fredrik Blix
ENASE2
2025 Compliance Standards and Frameworks and Its Implications on Cybersecurity: A NIS2 Study Within the Swedish Automotive Industries
Adenike Adesina, Elias Seid, Fredrik Blix, Oliver Popov
ICISSP (1)4
2024 Cyber Resilience Using ASFA: DORA-Compliant Threat-Led Penetration Testing
Elias Seid, Fredrik Blix, Oliver Popov
CRITIS3
2024 Security and SLA Monitoring for Cloud Services
Elias Seid, Mosammath Nazifa, Sneha Gupta, Oliver Popov, Fredrik Blix
ENASE4
2024 An Automated Adaptive Security Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems
Elias Seid, Oliver Popov, Fredrik Blix
ICISSP2
2024 XA4AS: Adaptive Security for Multi-Stage Attacks
Elias Seid, Oliver Popov, Fredrik Blix
IoTBDS2
2023 Towards Security Attack Event Monitoring for Cyber Physical-Systems
Elias Seid, Oliver Popov, Fredrik Blix
ICISSP2
2017 Security, Safety and Trust Management (SSTM '17)
abstract
The goal of SSTM'17 was to attract young researchers, Ph.D. students, practitioners, and industry experts to bring contributions in the area of Security, Safety and Trust Management, especially in the developments of computing, management and programming models, technologies, framework and middleware.
Haider Abbas, Eugenio Orlandi, Farrukh Aslam Khan, Oliver Popov, Asif Masood
WETICE4
2014 Extended Abstract Digital Forensics Model with Preservation and Protection as Umbrella Principles
abstract
In this research, a literature review was conducted where twenty (n=20) frameworks and models highlighting preservation of the integrity of digital evidence and protection of basic human rights during digital forensic investigations were studied. The models not discussing the process at an abstract level were excluded. Therefore, thirteen (n=13) of the studied models were included in our analysis. The results indicated that published abstract models lack preserving the integrity of digital evidence and protecting the basic human rights as explicit overarching umbrella principles. To overcome this problem, we proposed an extension to Reith's abstract digital forensics model explicating preservation of integrity and protection of human rights as the two necessary umbrella principles.
Shahzad Saleem, Oliver Popov, Ibrahim Bagilli
KES2
2013 Semantic Representation and Integration of Digital Evidence
abstract
The ever-increasing complexity and sophistication of computer and network attacks challenge society's dependability on digital infrastructure. Digital investigations recover and reconstruct the digital trails of such events and may employ practices from various subfields (computer, network forensics), each with its own set of techniques and tools. Integration of evidence from heterogeneous sources of data (e.g. disk images, network packet captures, logs) is often a manual and time- consuming process relying significantly on the investigator's expertise. In this paper, we propose and develop an approach, based on the Semantic Web framework, for ontologically representing and integrating digital evidence. The presented approach enhances existing forensic analysis techniques by providing partial and eventually full automation of the investigative process.
Spyridon Dosis, Irvin Homem, Oliver Popov
KES3
2012 Evaluating and Comparing Tools for Mobile Device Forensics Using Quantitative Analysis
Shahzad Saleem, Oliver Popov, Oheneba Kwame Appiah-Kubi
ICDF2C2
2010 Protecting Digital Evidence Integrity by Using Smart Cards
Shahzad Saleem, Oliver Popov
ICDF2C2