Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pedro E. Santacruz

dblp:93/9610 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-6880-6068ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Wireless networking · 70% Cellular and mobile networks · 18% Network optimization and economics · 12%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking › link scheduling
distributed link scheduling
0.212016
Leveraging Physical-Layer Capabilites: Distributed Scheduling in Interference Networks With Local Views · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016
Cellular and mobile networks
interference management
0.212016
Leveraging Physical-Layer Capabilites: Distributed Scheduling in Interference Networks With Local Views · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016
Wireless networking
medium access control
0.212016
Leveraging Physical-Layer Capabilites: Distributed Scheduling in Interference Networks With Local Views · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016
Wireless networking › scheduling
distributed scheduling
0.212013
Beyond interference avoidance: Distributed sub-network scheduling in wireless networks with local views · INFOCOM 2013
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.212013
Beyond interference avoidance: Distributed sub-network scheduling in wireless networks with local views · INFOCOM 2013
Wireless networking
scheduling
0.212013
Beyond interference avoidance: Distributed sub-network scheduling in wireless networks with local views · INFOCOM 2013
Wireless networking
network state information
0.112016
Leveraging Physical-Layer Capabilites: Distributed Scheduling in Interference Networks With Local Views · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016
Wireless networking
wireless network protocols
0.112016
Leveraging Physical-Layer Capabilites: Distributed Scheduling in Interference Networks With Local Views · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016
Information theory
network information theory
0.012013
Beyond interference avoidance: Distributed sub-network scheduling in wireless networks with local views · INFOCOM 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed algorithm · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Analysis and evaluation of the Hop Expansion Routing Algorithm (HERA) for delay-tolerant networks
abstract
This paper presents an analysis and evaluation of the Hop Expansion Routing Algorithm, HERA, for delay-tolerant networks. HERA works by computing a reachability metric, akin to the metric used in PRoPHET routing, but with the major distinction that HERA expands the computation of the metric into the contributions of paths of different lengths, thus providing a more flexible metric that allows for the fine tuning of the effects of transitivity. In particular, HERA gives the flexibility to address the question of how many hops of transitivity a routing algorithm should take into account when making forwarding decisions. We present simulation results showing improvement of HERA over PRoPHET in terms of delivery ratio, number of replicas, and latency for several mobility scenarios, including real-life traces.
Alexander K. Yee, Pedro E. Santacruz
WCNC2
2016 Leveraging Physical-Layer Capabilites: Distributed Scheduling in Interference Networks With Local Views
abstract
In most wireless networks, nodes have only limited local information about the state of the network, which includes connectivity and channel state information. With limited local information about the network, each node's knowledge is mismatched; therefore, they must make distributed decisions. In this paper, we pose the following question: If every node has network state information only about a small neighborhood, how and when should nodes choose to transmit? While link scheduling answers the above question for point-to-point physical layers that are designed for an interference-avoidance paradigm, we look for answers in cases when interference can be embraced by advanced PHY-layer design, as suggested by results in network information theory. To make progress on this challenging problem, we propose a constructive distributed algorithm that achieves rates higher than link scheduling based on interference avoidance, especially if each node knows more than one hop of network state information. We compare our new aggressive algorithm to a conservative algorithm we have presented in a 2013 conference paper. Both algorithms schedule subnetworks such that each subnetwork can employ advanced interference-embracing coding schemes to achieve higher rates. Our innovation is in the identification, selection, and scheduling of subnetworks, especially when subnetworks are larger than a single link.
Pedro E. Santacruz, Vaneet Aggarwal, Ashutosh Sabharwal
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.1
2013 Beyond interference avoidance: Distributed sub-network scheduling in wireless networks with local views
abstract
In most wireless networks, nodes have only limited local information about the network state, which includes connectivity and channel state information. With limited local information about the network, each node's knowledge is mismatched, therefore they must make distributed decisions. In this paper, we pose the following question - if every node has network state information only about a small neighborhood, how and when should nodes choose to transmit? While scheduling answers the above question for point-to-point physical layers which are designed for an interference-avoidance paradigm, we look for answers in cases when interference can be embraced by advanced code design, as suggested by results in network information theory. To make progress on this challenging problem, we propose a distributed algorithm which achieves rates higher than interference-avoidance based link scheduling, especially if each node knows more than one hop of network state information.
Pedro E. Santacruz, Vaneet Aggarwal, Ashutosh Sabharwal
INFOCOM1