Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steve Lesser
dblp:93/9662
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8059-036XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 96% Geometric modeling and processing · 4% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer animation and physical simulation
deformable body simulation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Loki: a unified multiphysics simulation framework for production · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
finite element method |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Loki: a unified multiphysics simulation framework for production · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › fluid simulation › eulerian-lagrangian simulation
FLIP method |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Loki: a unified multiphysics simulation framework for production · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
fluid simulation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Loki: a unified multiphysics simulation framework for production · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Geometric modeling and processing
procedural modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Metropolis procedural modeling · ACM Trans. Graph. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
state machine · 0.6sparse techniques · 0.6linear equation solvers · 0.6MPI · 0.6optimization over productions · 0.1metropolis sampling · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Loki: a unified multiphysics simulation framework for productionabstractWe introduce Loki, a new framework for robust simulation of fluid, rigid, and deformable objects with non-compromising fidelity on any single element, and capabilities for coupling and representation transitions across multiple elements. Loki adapts multiple best-in-class solvers into a unified framework driven by a declarative state machine where users declare 'what' is simulated but not 'when,' so an automatic scheduling system takes care of mixing any combination of objects. This leads to intuitive setups for coupled simulations such as hair in the wind or objects transitioning from one representation to another, for example bulk water FLIP particles to SPH spray particles to volumetric mist. We also provide a consistent treatment for components used in several domains, such as unified collision and attachment constraints across 1D, 2D, 3D deforming and rigid objects. Distribution over MPI, custom linear equation solvers, and aggressive application of sparse techniques keep performance within production requirements. We demonstrate a variety of solvers within the framework and their interactions, including FLIPstyle liquids, spatially adaptive volumetric fluids, SPH, MPM, and mesh-based solids, including but not limited to discrete elastic rods, elastons, and FEM with state-of-the-art constitutive models. Our framework has proven powerful and intuitive enough for voluntary artist adoption and has delivered creature and FX simulations for multiple major movie productions in the preceding four years. Steve Lesser, Alexey Stomakhin, Gilles Daviet, Joel Wretborn, John Edholm, Noh-Hoon Lee, Eston Schweickart, Xiao Zhai, Sean Flynn, Andrew Moffat |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |
| 2011 | Metropolis procedural modelingabstractProcedural representations provide powerful means for generating complex geometric structures. They are also notoriously difficult to control. In this article, we present an algorithm for controlling grammar-based procedural models. Given a grammar and a high-level specification of the desired production, the algorithm computes a production from the grammar that conforms to the specification. This production is generated by optimizing over the space of possible productions from the grammar. The algorithm supports specifications of many forms, including geometric shapes and analytical objectives. We demonstrate the algorithm on procedural models of trees, cities, buildings, and Mondrian paintings. Jerry O. Talton, Yu Lou 0003, Steve Lesser, Jared Duke, Radomír Mech, Vladlen Koltun |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 3 |