Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oskars Ozolins

dblp:94/10658 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9839-7488ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Optical networks · 84% Physical-layer communications · 16%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Optical networks › impairment compensation
digital backpropagation
0.912025
Physics-Regulated Digital Backpropagation for Optical Fiber Systems With Imprecise Parameters · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Optical networks
impairment compensation
0.912025
Physics-Regulated Digital Backpropagation for Optical Fiber Systems With Imprecise Parameters · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Optical networks
optical fiber communication
0.912025
Physics-Regulated Digital Backpropagation for Optical Fiber Systems With Imprecise Parameters · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Physical-layer communications
signal processing for communications
0.412020
Kernel Affine Projection for Nonlinearity Tolerant Optical Short Reach Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020
Physical-layer communications › optical communication
intensity modulation direct detection
0.112020
Kernel Affine Projection for Nonlinearity Tolerant Optical Short Reach Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

physics-informed neural network · 0.9phase-shift weight function · 0.9optimization-estimation-initialization · 0.9reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.4kernel affine projection · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Physics-Regulated Digital Backpropagation for Optical Fiber Systems With Imprecise Parameters
abstract
Current signal processing algorithms excel at impairment compensation when the parameters of optical fiber systems are precisely defined. However, their effectiveness diminishes considerably in the presence of imprecise parameters. By integrating ‘knowledge application from physics to neural networks (NN)’ with ‘information feedback from NNs to physics’, this paper proposes a physics-regulated digital backpropagation (PR-DBP) algorithm, which shows great promise for impairment compensation with imprecise fiber parameters. The PR-DBP employs an optimization-estimation-initialization loop structure. The optimization process provides the network’s adaptability by minimizing the loss value as in conventional NNs. The estimation process dynamically tracks physical parameters by extracting information from NNs to the physical domain. The initialization process offers a physics-based global control over the neural network, thereby mitigating the risk of overfitting by preventing an excessive focus on loss minimization. Moreover, a phase-shift weight function is applied to further improve algorithmic efficiency. Numerical analyses indicate that the PR-DBP significantly outperforms conventional methods in optical fiber systems with imprecise parameters, achieving a bit error rate reduction by an order of magnitude. As a mutually reinforcing part of impairment compensation, a high-accuracy and adaptive fiber parameter estimation is also demonstrated.
Lu Zhang 0051, Xianbin Yu, Zhanhong Wang, Oskars Ozolins, Xiaodan Pang, Maïté Brandt-Pearce
IEEE Trans. Commun.5
2024 Video expert assessment of high quality video for Video Assistant Referee (VAR): A comparative study
abstract
Abstract The International Football Association Board decided to introduce Video Assistant Referee (VAR) in 2018. This led to the need to develop methods for quality control of the VAR-systems. This article focuses on the important aspect to evaluate the video quality. Video Quality assessment has matured in the sense that there are standardized, commercial products and established open-source solutions to measure it with objective methods. Previous research has primarily focused on the end-user quality assessment. How to assess the video in the contribution phase of the chain is less studied. The novelties of this study are two-fold: 1) The user study is specifically targeting video experts i.e., to assess the perceived quality of video professionals working with video production. 2) Six video quality models have been independently benchmarked against the user data and evaluated to show which of the models could provide the best predictions of perceived quality. The independent evaluation is important to get unbiased results as shown by the Video Quality Experts Group. An experiment was performed involving 25 video experts in which they rated the perceived quality. The video formats tested were High-Definition TV both progressive and interlaced as well as a quarters size format that was scaled down half the size in both width and height. The videos were encoded with both H.264 and Motion JPEG for the full size but only H.264 for the quarter size. Bitrates ranged from 80 Mbit/s down to 10 Mbit/s. We could see that for H.264 that the quality was overall very good but dropped somewhat for 10 Mbit/s. For Motion JPEG the quality dropped over the whole range. For the interlaced format the degradation that was based on a simple deinterlacing method did receive overall low ratings. For the quarter size three different scaling algorithms were evaluated. Lanczos performed the best and Bilinear the worst. The performance of six different video quality models were evaluated for 1080p and 1080i. The Video Quality Metric for Variable Frame Delay had the best performance for both formats, followed by Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion method and the Video Quality Metric General model.
Kjell Brunnström, Anders Djupsjobacka, Johsan Billingham, Katharina Wistel, Börje Andrén, Oskars Ozolins, Nicolas Evans
Multim. Tools Appl.6
2020 Kernel Affine Projection for Nonlinearity Tolerant Optical Short Reach Systems
abstract
Nonlinearity is one of the key issues that hinder the development of high-capacity optical short reach systems. This paper proposes three variants of kernel affine projection (KAP) algorithms, all of which combine kernel mapping and affine projection in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space for compensating nonlinear impairments in optical short reach systems. An intensity modulation/direct detection system with a single digital-to-analogue converter, a packaged externally modulated laser and a packaged InP photo-detector is used for experimental demonstration, achieving 238-Gbps (net rate 222-Gbps). Experimental results show that the KAP algorithms can mitigate nonlinear impairments in short-reach communications while maintaining low complexity in reproducing kernel Hilbert space.
Lu Zhang 0051, Jiajia Chen 0001, Aleksejs Udalcovs, Xiaodan Pang, Richard Schatz, Urban Westergren, Sergei Popov, Shilin Xiao, Oskars Ozolins
IEEE Trans. Commun.9