Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nadine Heumesser

dblp:94/1173 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements engineering
requirements reuse
0.012003
Towards Systematic Recycling of Systems Requirements · ICSE 2003
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements modeling
0.012003
Towards Systematic Recycling of Systems Requirements · ICSE 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Experiences in Managing an Automotive Requirements Engineering Process
Nadine Heumesser, Frank Houdek
RE1
2003 Towards Systematic Recycling of Systems Requirements
abstract
Many (technical) systems are not developed from scratch but as an evolution of existing systems. Consequently, a large portion of the system requirements employed can be recycled when building the next version of the product. Usually, this recycling step is performed unsystematically, i.e. simply by copying and modifying complete requirements documents. In this paper, we present in a case study a lightweight requirements recycling approach which evolved from observations and concrete needs of projects at DaimlerChrysler Passenger Car Development. The basic idea of the approach is separation of model-dependent from model-independent requirements on the same level of abstraction. This notion is supported by document structures, criteria for identifying reusable requirements and tool support. The paper presents the core elements of the approach and provides observations and valuable experiences we made in the projects.
Nadine Heumesser, Frank Houdek
ICSE1