Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John Sheu

dblp:94/1608 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Query processing and optimization · 44% Data integration and cleaning · 40% Data mining · 16%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
data explanation
0.822021
DIFF: a relational interface for large-scale data explanation · VLDB J. 2021
DIFF: A Relational Interface for Large-Scale Data Explanation · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018
Query processing and optimization › aggregation
aggregate functions
0.312018
DIFF: A Relational Interface for Large-Scale Data Explanation · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relational operators · 0.3SQL extension · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 DIFF: a relational interface for large-scale data explanation
Firas Abuzaid, Peter Kraft, Sahaana Suri, Edward Gan, Eric Xu, Atul Shenoy, Asvin Ananthanarayan, John Sheu, Erik Meijer 0001, Xi Wu 0001, Jeffrey F. Naughton, Peter Bailis, Matei Zaharia
VLDB J.8
2018 DIFF: A Relational Interface for Large-Scale Data Explanation
abstract
A range of explanation engines assist data analysts by performing feature selection over increasingly high-volume and high-dimensional data, grouping and highlighting commonalities among data points. While useful in diverse tasks such as user behavior analytics, operational event processing, and root cause analysis, today's explanation engines are designed as standalone data processing tools that do not interoperate with traditional, SQL-based analytics workflows; this limits the applicability and extensibility of these engines. In response, we propose the DIFF operator, a relational aggregation operator that unifies the core functionality of these engines with declarative relational query processing. We implement both single-node and distributed versions of the DIFF operator in MB SQL, an extension of MacroBase, and demonstrate how DIFF can provide the same semantics as existing explanation engines while capturing a broad set of production use cases in industry, including at Microsoft and Facebook. Additionally, we illustrate how this declarative approach to data explanation enables new logical and physical query optimizations. We evaluate these optimizations on several real-world production applications, and find that DIFF in MB SQL can outperform state-of-the-art engines by up to an order of magnitude.
Firas Abuzaid, Peter Kraft, Sahaana Suri, Edward Gan, Eric Xu, Atul Shenoy, Asvin Anathanaraya, John Sheu, Erik Meijer 0001, Xi Wu 0001, Jeffrey F. Naughton, Peter Bailis, Matei Zaharia
Proc. VLDB Endow.8
2004 Evaluating Techniques for Exploiting Instruction Slack
abstract
In many workloads, 25% to 50% of instructions have slack allowing them to be delayed without impacting performance. To exploit this slack, processors may implement more power-efficient, longer latency pipelines or provide dynamically scaled pipelines using multiple clock domains. Issuing instructions with slack to slower pipelines can result in substantial power savings, with minimal performance loss. Considering both dynamic and static power dissipation, we found that by using longer latency pipelines the power of functional unit pipelines decreases by 20% to 55% with a performance impact of 0% to 3% for SPEC2000 and MediaBench workloads. Dynamic scaling reduces the performance loss in intense multimedia workloads by up to 2%, but achieves lower power savings.
Yau Chin, John Sheu, David Brooks 0001
ICCD2