Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nagaraj Ns

dblp:94/180 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0003-2373-3293ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Integrated circuit design · 34% Energy-efficient computing · 34% Electronic design automation · 31%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy-efficient computing › low-power design
ultra-low power design
0.112010
What's cool for the future of ultra low power designs? · DAC 2010
Integrated circuit design
variation-aware design
0.112010
Who solves the variability problem? · DAC 2010
Electronic design automation
design methodology
0.122010
What's cool for the future of ultra low power designs? · DAC 2010
Who solves the variability problem? · DAC 2010
Electronic design automation › yield analysis
process variation modeling
0.012010
Who solves the variability problem? · DAC 2010
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Who solves the variability problem?
abstract
Although innovations in manufacturing technology help in reducing variations, IC design variations are a fact of life. In addition to random variations, systematic stress induced variations are becoming increasingly important. This panel will bring the diverse views from academia, foundries, fabless and IDM communities to address various topics on next generation solutions for variability, with the main emphasis on design and architecture solutions. Specifically, this panel will discuss:• Would new architectures mitigate variability in 22nm and beyond?• Could design regularity effectively mitigate variability?• What design techniques can be used to minimize variability 'on-the-fly'?• What new techniques can be used for memories, register arrays and flip-flops?
Nagaraj Ns, Juan C. Rey, Jamil Kawa, Robert C. Aitken, Christian Lütkemeyer, Vijay Pitchumani, Andrzej J. Strojwas, Steven Trimberger
DAC1
2010 What's cool for the future of ultra low power designs?
abstract
Ultra low power and energy efficiency requirements are common to most IC designs today. Requirements range from extending battery life to operating on harvested energy, with applications ranging from consumer electronics to medical applications. Design methodologies have evolved over the past decade to cater to low power designs. This panel will discuss the design methodology challenges in the next generation ultra low power and energy efficient IC designs, covering EDA roadmap, low power standards, and design and verification flows.
Nagaraj Ns, John Byler, Koorosh Nazifi, Venugopal Puvvada, Toshiyuki Saito, Alan Gibbons, S. Balajee
DAC1
1999 Chip-Level Verification for Parasitic Coupling Effects in Deep-Submicron Digital Designs
abstract
Interconnect parasitics are playing a dominant role in determining chip performance and functionality in deep-submicron designs. This problem is compounded by increasing chip frequencies and design complexity. As parasitic coupling capacitances are a significant portion of total capacitance in deep-submicron designs, verification of both performance and functionality assumes greater importance. This paper describes techniques for the modeling and analysis of parasitic coupling effects for large VLSI designs. Analysis results from a controlled experimental setup are presented to show the need for accurate cell models. Results from application of these techniques on a lending edge Digital Signal Processor (DSP) design are presented. Accuracy comparison with detailed SPICE-level analysis is included.
Lun Ye, Foong-Charn Chang, Peter Feldmann, Rakesh Chadha, Nagaraj Ns, Frank Cano
DATE5
1999 Performance and Reliability Verification of C6201/C6701 Digital Signal Processors
abstract
Dominance of interconnect parasitics in impacting functionality, performance and reliability in deep sub-micron (DSM) designs is a well known topic. Reduced metal pitches, process variations, new materials for metallization/dielectrics emphasizes an increased need for an accurate and yet practical methodology for full-chip performance and reliability verification. This paper describes salient features of the methodology used for timing verification, interconnect modeling, coupling compensation, signal electromigration, power network analysis on power distribution networks. Results from the application of this methodology on TMS320C6201 and TMS320C6701 designed in 0.18 u technology are discussed.
Nagaraj Ns, Frank Cano, Sudha Thiruvengadam, Deepak Kapoor
ICCD1