In conventional multiprocessor SoC (MPSoC) design methods, we find two problems: lack of SW code portability and lack of early SW validation. The problems cause a long design cycle. To resolve them, we present a concept of two-layer hardware-dependent software (HdS). The presented HdS consists of hardware abstraction layer to abstract the sub-system architecture and SoC abstraction layer to abstract the global MPSoC architecture. During the exploration of global and sub-system architectures, the application programming interfaces of presented two-layer HdS allow to keep the SW independent from architectural change. The simulation models of two-layer HdS enable to validate the entire system including the SW and HW design early in the design steps. We show the effectiveness of the presented methodology in the MPSoC architecture exploration of an OpenDiVX encoder system design.

This paper presents a high-level component-based methodology and design environment for application-specific multicore SoC architectures. Component-based design provides primitives to build complex architectures from basic components. This bottom-up approach allows design-architects to explore efficient custom solutions with best performances. This paper presents a high-level component-based methodology and design environment for application-specific multicore SoC architectures. The system specifications are represented as a virtual architecture described in a SystemC-like model and annotated with a set of configuration parameters. Our component-based design environment provides automatic wrapper-generation tools able to synthesize hardware interfaces, device drivers, and operating systems that implement a high-level interconnect API. This approach, experimented over a VDSL system, shows a drastic design time reduction without any significant efficiency loss in the final circuit.

This paper describes the experience and the lessons learned during the design of an ATM traffic shaper circuit using behavioral synthesis. The experiment is based on the comparison of the results of two parallel design flows starting from the same specification. The first used a classical design method based on RTL synthesis. The second design flow is based on behavioral synthesis. The experiment has shown that behavioral synthesis is able to produce efficient design in terms of gate count and timing while bringing a threefold reduction in design effort when compared to the RTL design methodology.