Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raymond Hill

dblp:94/2814 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › linear code
binary linear codes
0.011990
The nonexistence of certain binary linear codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1990
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code
0.011990
The nonexistence of certain binary linear codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1990
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
coding bounds
0.011990
The nonexistence of certain binary linear codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1990
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coding bounds › minimum distance bounds
minimum distance upper bound
0.011990
The nonexistence of certain binary linear codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1990
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 The nonexistence of certain binary linear codes
abstract
Some of the upper bounds given by T. Verhoeff (1987) are improved by proving the nonexistence of codes with certain parameters. Necessary preliminary results are stated. The results give rise to upper bounds on d(n, k) for many further values of (n, k) by using simple standard techniques. The further bounds would automatically follow from theorems by using Verhoeff's computerized updating program, but the authors state them here because several of them are required in the proofs of subsequent theorems.>
Raymond Hill, Karen L. Traynor
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1