Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marcin Sabok

dblp:94/315 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-7755-4218ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 77% Automata and formal languages · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems
language semantics
0.512021
Probabilistic programming semantics for name generation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
probabilistic programming semantics
0.512021
Probabilistic programming semantics for name generation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021
Logic in computer science › semantics
denotational semantics
0.512021
Probabilistic programming semantics for name generation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quasi-borel spaces · 1.0descriptive set theory · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Probabilistic programming semantics for name generation
abstract
We make a formal analogy between random sampling and fresh name generation. We show that quasi-Borel spaces, a model for probabilistic programming, can soundly interpret the ν-calculus, a calculus for name generation. Moreover, we prove that this semantics is fully abstract up to first-order types. This is surprising for an ‘off-the-shelf’ model, and requires a novel analysis of probability distributions on function spaces. Our tools are diverse and include descriptive set theory and normal forms for the ν-calculus.
Marcin Sabok, Sam Staton, Dario Stein, Michael Wolman
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1
2013 Baumgartner's conjecture and bounded forcing axioms
abstract
We study the spectrum of forcing notions between the iterations of σ-closed followed by ccc forcings and the proper forcings. This includes the hierarchy of α-proper forcings for indecomposable countable ordinals α, the Axiom A forcings and forcings completely embeddable into an iteration of a σ-closed followed by a ccc forcing. For the latter class, we present an equivalent characterization in terms of Baumgartnerʼs Axiom A. This resolves a conjecture of Baumgartner from the 1980s. We also study the bounded forcing axioms for the hierarchy of α-proper forcings. Following ideas of Shelah we separate them for distinct countable indecomposable ordinals.
David Asperó, Sy-David Friedman, Miguel Angel Mota, Marcin Sabok
Ann. Pure Appl. Log.4
2012 Decomposing Borel functions and structure at finite levels of the Baire hierarchy
Janusz Pawlikowski, Marcin Sabok
Ann. Pure Appl. Log.2
2011 Forcing properties of ideals of closed sets
abstract
Abstract With everyσ-idealIon a Polish space we associate theσ-idealI* generated by the closed sets inI. We study the forcing notions of Borel sets modulo the respectiveσ-idealsIandI* and find connections between their forcing properties. To this end, we associate to aσ-ideal on a Polish space an ideal on a countable set and show how forcing properties of the forcing depend on combinatorial properties of the ideal. We also study the1–1 or constantproperty ofσ-ideals, i.e., the property that every Borel function defined on a Borel positive set can be restricted to a positive Borel set on which it either 1–1 or constant. We prove the following dichotomy: ifIis aσ-ideal generated by closed sets, then either the forcingP1adds a Cohen real, or elseIhas the 1–1 or constant property.
Marcin Sabok, Jindrich Zapletal
J. Symb. Log.1