Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brammert Ottens
dblp:94/3599
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-1236-6029ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Multi-agent systems · 38% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 38% Reinforcement learning · 23% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed constraint optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems · AAAI 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative spatial reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | The Mathematical Morpho-Logical View on Reasoning about Space · IJCAI 2007 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | The Mathematical Morpho-Logical View on Reasoning about Space · IJCAI 2007 |
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | The Mathematical Morpho-Logical View on Reasoning about Space · IJCAI 2007 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
upper confidence bound |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems · AAAI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
upper confidence tree · 0.1upper confidence bound · 0.1mathematical morphology · 0.1distributed search · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization ProblemsabstractWe propose a distributed upper confidence bound approach, DUCT, for solving distributed constraint optimization problems. We compare four variants of this approach with a baseline random sampling algorithm, as well as other complete and incomplete algorithms for DCOPs. Under general assumptions, we theoretically show that the solution found by DUCT after T steps is approximately T −1 -close to the optimal. Experimentally, we show that DUCT matches the optimal solution found by the well-known DPOP and O-DPOP algorithms on moderate-size problems, while always requiring less agent communication. For larger problems, where DPOP fails, we show that DUCT produces significantly better solutions than local, incomplete algorithms. Overall, we believe that DUCT is a practical, scalable algorithm for complex DCOPs. Brammert Ottens, Christos Dimitrakakis, Boi Faltings |
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. | 1 |
| 2012 | DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization ProblemsabstractThe Upper Confidence Bounds (UCB) algorithm is a well-known near-optimal strategy for the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem. Its extensions to trees, such as the Upper Confidence Tree (UCT) algorithm, have resulted in good solutions to the problem of Go. This paper introduces DUCT, a distributed algorithm inspired by UCT, for solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOP). Bounds on the solution quality are provided, and experiments show that, compared to existing DCOP approaches, DUCT is able to solve very large problems much more efficiently, or to find significantly higher quality solutions. Brammert Ottens, Christos Dimitrakakis, Boi Faltings |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2007 | The Mathematical Morpho-Logical View on Reasoning about Space
Marco Aiello 0001, Brammert Ottens |
IJCAI | 2 |