Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dani Zweig
dblp:94/3701
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Empirical software engineering · 44% Software maintenance and evolution · 44% Requirements engineering and software design · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
software metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Automating Output Size and Reuse Metrics in a Repository-Based Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) Environment · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1994 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software reuse |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Repository Evaluation of Software Reuse · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993 |
Requirements engineering and software design
computer-aided software engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Repository Evaluation of Software Reuse · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
function point analysis · 0.0repository analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Automating Output Size and Reuse Metrics in a Repository-Based Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) EnvironmentabstractMeasurement of software development productivity is needed in order to control software costs, but it is discouragingly labor-intensive and expensive. Computer-aided software engineering (CASE) technologies/spl minus/especially repository-based, integrated CASE/spl minus/have the potential to support the automation of this measurement. We discuss the conceptual basis for the development of automated analyzers for function point and software reuse measurement for object-based CASE. Both analyzers take advantage of the existence of a representation of the application system that is stored within an object repository, and that contains the necessary information about the application system. We also discuss metrics for software reuse measurement, including reuse leverage, reuse value, and reuse classification that are motivated by managerial requirements and the efforts, within industry and the IEEE, to standardize measurement. The functionality and the analytical capabilities of state-of-the-art automated software metrics analyzers are illustrated in the context of an investment banking industry application that is similar to systems deployed at the New York City-based investment bank where these tools were developed and tested.> Rajiv D. Banker, Robert J. Kauffman, Charles Wright, Dani Zweig |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 4 |
| 1993 | Repository Evaluation of Software ReuseabstractThe use and benefits of repository evaluation of software reuse are illustrated through an analysis of the evolving repositories of two large firms that recently implemented integrated CASE development tools. The analysis shows that these tools have supported high levels of software reuse, but it also suggests that there remains considerable unexploited reuse potential. The findings indicate that organizational changes will be required before the full potential of the new technology can be realized.> Rajiv D. Banker, Robert J. Kauffman, Dani Zweig |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |