Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Norman Dziengel

dblp:94/3983 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › event detection
distributed event detection
0.222010
A system for distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2010
In-network training and distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks · SenSys 2008
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.222010
A system for distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2010
In-network training and distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks · SenSys 2008
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
in-network processing
0.112008
In-network training and distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks · SenSys 2008
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
energy-efficient computing
0.012010
A system for distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2010
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning
0.012008
In-network training and distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks · SenSys 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed training · 0.2on-node processing · 0.1collaborative event detection · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Deployment and evaluation of a fully applicable distributed event detection system in Wireless Sensor Networks
Norman Dziengel, Martin Seiffert, Marco Ziegert, Stephan Adler, Stefan Pfeiffer 0002, Jochen H. Schiller
Ad Hoc Networks1
2010 A system for distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks
abstract
Event detection is a major issue for applications of wireless sensor networks. In order to detect an event, a sensor network has to identify which application-specific incident has occurred based on the raw data gathered by individual sensor nodes. In this context, an event may be anything from a malfunction of monitored machinery to an intrusion into a restricted area. The goal is to provide high-accuracy event detection at minimal energy cost in order to maximize network lifetime. In this paper, we present a system for collaborative event detection directly on the sensor nodes. The system does not require a base station for centralized coordination or processing, and is fully trainable to recognize different classes of application-specific events. Communication overhead is reduced to a minimum by processing raw data directly on the sensor nodes and only reporting which events have been detected. The detection accuracy is evaluated using a 100node sensor network deployed as a wireless alarm system on the fence of a real-world construction site.
Georg Wittenburg, Norman Dziengel, Christian Wartenburger, Jochen H. Schiller
IPSN2
2009 Quality Estimation based Data Fusion in Wireless Sensor Networks
abstract
The main purpose of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is to obtain information about their environment. However, WSNs often produce imprecise and incorrect sensor data, e.g. because of sensor failure or unreliable radio communication. We propose a system for WSN applications that allows to assess the quality of sensor data and further allows to fuse data based on their estimated quality. Our system comprises local and distributed heuristics to estimate the quality of sensor data, with a focus on data accuracy and data consistency. In the fusion step, the most plausible value of the measured quantity is inferred from multiple sensor readings by use of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Both quality assessment and data fusion are carried out within the network and thus do not rely on a powerful sink node. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our system by means of a wireless game controller for the game Pong, built from multiple sensor nodes. The controller can detect and reject incorrect sensor readings and thus improve the player's control over the in-game paddle.
Frederik Hermans, Norman Dziengel, Jochen H. Schiller
MASS2
2008 In-network training and distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks
abstract
In order to avoid transmitting raw data to a base station, sensor nodes are trained to cooperatively recognize deployment-specific events based on the data sampled by their sensors. As both training and event detection are performed without the need for central coordination or processing, only information about the detected event needs to be reported.
Georg Wittenburg, Norman Dziengel, Jochen H. Schiller
SenSys2