Continued scaling of process technologies is critical to sustaining improvements in processor frequencies and performance. However, shrinking process technologies exacerbates process variations - the deviation of process parameters from their target specifications. In the context of multi-core CMPs, which are implemented to feature homogeneous cores, within-die process variations result in substantially different core frequencies. Exposing such process-variation induced heterogeneity interferes with the norm of marketing chips at a single frequency. Further, application performance is undesirably dictated by the frequency of the core it is running on. To work around these challenges, a single uniform frequency, dictated by the slowest core, is currently chosen as the chip frequency sacrificing the increased performance capabilities of cores that could operate at higher frequencies. In this paper, we propose choosing the mean frequency across all cores, in lieu of the minimum frequency, as the single-frequency to use as the chip sales frequency. We examine several scheduling algorithms implemented below the O/S in hardware/firmware that guarantee minimum application performance near that of the average frequency, by masking process-variation induced heterogeneity from the end-user. We show that our Throughput-Driven Fairness (TDF) scheduling policy improves throughput by an average of 12% compared to a naive fairness scheme (round-robin) for frequency-sensitive applications. At the same time, TDF allows 98% of chips to maintain minimum performance at or above 90% of that expected at the mean frequency, providing a single uniform performance level to present for the chip.

Dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) is a commonly-used power-management scheme that dynamically adjusts power and performance to the time-varying needs of running programs. Unfortunately, conventional DVFS, relying on off-chip regulators, faces limitations in terms of temporal granularity and high costs when considered for future multi-core systems. To overcome these challenges, this paper presents thread motion (TM), a fine-grained power-management scheme for chip multiprocessors (CMPs). Instead of incurring the high cost of changing the voltage and frequency of different cores, TM enables rapid movement of threads to adapt the time-varying computing needs of running applications to a mixture of cores with fixed but different power/performance levels. Results show that for the same power budget, two voltage/frequency levels are sufficient to provide performance gains commensurate to idealized scenarios using per-core voltage control. Thread motion extends workload-based power management into the nanosecond realm and, for a given power budget, provides up to 20% better performance than coarse-grained DVFS.

Increases in peak current draw and reductions in the operating voltage of processors stress the importance of dealing with voltage fluctuations in processors. Noise-margin violations lead to undesired effects, like timing violations, which may result in incorrect execution of applications. Several recent architectural solutions for inductive noise have been proposed that, unfortunately, have a strong correlation to the underlying power-delivery package model and require a feedback loop that is largely constrained by the voltage/current sensor characteristics. The resulting solutions are not robust across a wide range of microprocessor designs and packaging technologies. This paper proposes a Delayed-commit and rollback scheme (DeCoR) that guarantees correctness, insensitive to the package model or the responsiveness of the voltage sensors. In particular, our approach recovers from, rather than attempting to avoid, voltage emergencies. This approach incurs a small performance penalty when compared to an ideal machine that does not have voltage emergencies. We show that explicit checkpoint-recovery schemes, intended to handle infrequent events, e.g., radiation-induced soft errors, suffer from large performance overheads for frequently-occurring voltage emergencies. DeCoR requires very few modifications to modern processor designs, as it leverages the existing store queue and reorder buffers. Unlike conventional designs that conservatively protect all components of the processor from inductive noise with overly-large timing margins, our approach only requires conservative protection of the architected register state and cache write paths.

Increases in peak current draw and reductions in the operating voltages ofprocessors continue to amplify the importance of dealing with voltage fluctuations in processors. One approach suggested has been to not only react to these fluctuations but also attempt to eliminate future occurrences of these fluctuations by dynamically modifying the executing program. This paper investigates the potential of a very simple dynamic scheme to appreciably reduce the number of run-time voltage emergencies. It shows that we can map many of the voltage emergencies in the execution of the SPEC benchmarks on an aggressive superscalar design to a few static loops, categorize the microarchitectural cause of the emergencies in each important loop through simple observations and a simple priority function, and finally apply straight forward software optimization strategies to mitigate up to 70% of the future voltage swings.