William Shaver

dblp:94/811 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 39% Transport protocols and congestion control · 30% Content delivery and video streaming · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › multicast
layered multicast
0.012002
FLID-DL: congestion control for layered multicast · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2002
Transport protocols and congestion control › congestion management
multicast congestion control
0.012002
FLID-DL: congestion control for layered multicast · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2002
Content delivery and video streaming
multirate multicast
0.012002
FLID-DL: congestion control for layered multicast · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0dynamic layering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 FLID-DL: congestion control for layered multicast
abstract
We describe fair layered increase/decrease with dynamic layering (FLID-DL): a new multirate congestion control algorithm for layered multicast sessions. FLID-DL generalizes the receiver-driven layered congestion control protocol (RLC) introduced by Vicisano et al. (Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, CA, , p.996-1003, Mar. 1998)ameliorating the problems associated with large Internet group management protocol (IGMP) leave latencies and abrupt rate increases. Like RLC, FLID-DL, is a scalable, receiver-driven congestion control mechanism in which receivers add layers at sender-initiated synchronization points and leave layers when they experience congestion. FLID-DL congestion control coexists with transmission control protocol (TCP) flows as well as other FLID-DL sessions and supports general rates on the different multicast layers. We demonstrate via simulations that our congestion control scheme exhibits better fairness properties and provides better throughput than previous methods. A key contribution that enables FLID-DL and may be useful elsewhere is dynamic layering (DL), which mitigates the negative impact of long IGMP leave latencies and eliminates the need for probe intervals present in RLC. We use DL to respond to congestion much faster than IGMP leave operations, which have proven to be a bottleneck in practice for prior work.
John W. Byers, Gavin B. Horn, Michael Luby, Michael Mitzenmacher, William Shaver
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.5