Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anders Johannsen

dblp:94/8340 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
19ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 31% Information extraction and text analysis · 26% Question answering and dialogue systems · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution · ACL (1) 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
planning evaluation
0.912025
ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.722020
Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020
Any-language frame-semantic parsing · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue understanding
conversational semantic parsing
0.412020
Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
dialogue state tracking
0.412020
Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.412020
Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
cross-lingual NLP
0.212015
Inverted indexing for cross-lingual NLP · ACL (1) 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
frame-semantic parsing
0.212015
Any-language frame-semantic parsing · EMNLP 2015
Computational social science and digital humanities
sociolinguistics
0.212015
User Review Sites as a Resource for Large-Scale Sociolinguistic Studies · WWW 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.212014
Importance weighting and unsupervised domain adaptation of POS taggers: a negative result · EMNLP 2014
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation
0.212014
Importance weighting and unsupervised domain adaptation of POS taggers: a negative result · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.212013
Using Crowdsourcing to get Representations based on Regular Expressions · EMNLP 2013
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer
0.112015
Any-language frame-semantic parsing · EMNLP 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
crowdsourcing
0.012013
Using Crowdsourcing to get Representations based on Regular Expressions · EMNLP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated environment · 0.9weakly supervised learning · 0.2inverted indexing · 0.2interlingual representation · 0.2bilingual dictionary · 0.2quantilization · 0.2importance weighting · 0.2regular expression extraction · 0.2crowdsourcing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution
abstract
Alexandru Coca, Mark Gaynor, Zhenxing Zhang, Jianpeng Cheng, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Hector Martinez Alonso, Diarmuid O Seaghdha, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Alexandru Coca, Mark Gaynor, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen
ACL (1)9
2025 PyTOD: Programmable Task-Oriented Dialogue with Execution Feedback
abstract
Programmable task-oriented dialogue (TOD) agents enable language models to follow structured dialogue policies, but their effectiveness hinges on accurate dialogue state tracking (DST). We present PyTOD, an agent that generates executable code to track dialogue state and uses policy and execution feedback for efficient error correction. To achieve this, PyTOD employs a simple constrained decoding approach, using a language model instead of grammar rules to follow API schemata. This leads to state-of-the-art DST performance on the challenging SGD benchmark. Our experiments show that PyTOD surpasses strong baselines in both accuracy and cross-turn consistency, demonstrating the effectiveness of execution-aware state tracking.
Alexandru Coca, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Mark Gaynor, Joe Stacey, Tristan Guigue, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen
SIGDIAL11
2024 Effective and Efficient Conversation Retrieval for Dialogue State Tracking with Implicit Text Summaries
abstract
Seanie Lee, Jianpeng Cheng, Joris Driesen, Alexandru Coca, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Seanie Lee, Jianpeng Cheng 0002, Joris Driesen, Alexandru Coca, Anders Johannsen
NAACL-HLT5
2020 Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking
abstract
Jianpeng Cheng, Devang Agrawal, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Shruti Bhargava, Joris Driesen, Federico Flego, Dain Kaplan, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Lin Li, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Jason D. Williams, Hong Yu, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020.
Jianpeng Cheng 0002, Devang Agrawal, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Shruti Bhargava, Joris Driesen, Federico Flego, Dain Kaplan, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Jason D. Williams, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen
EMNLP (1)14
2016 Exploring Language Variation Across Europe - A Web-based Tool for Computational Sociolinguistics
Dirk Hovy, Anders Johannsen
LREC2
2016 The SemDaX Corpus ― Sense Annotations with Scalable Sense Inventories
Bolette S. Pedersen, Anna Braasch, Anders Johannsen, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Sanni Nimb, Sussi Olsen, Anders Søgaard, Nicolai Hartvig Sørensen
LREC3
2016 An empirically grounded expansion of the supersense inventory
abstract
In this article we present an expansion of the supersense inventory.All new supersenses are extensions of members of the current inventory, which we postulate by identifying semantically coherent groups of synsets.We cover the expansion of the already-established supernsense inventory for nouns and verbs, the addition of coarse supersenses for adjectives in absence of a canonical supersense inventory, and supersenses for verbal satellites.We evaluate the viability of the new senses examining the annotation agreement, frequency and co-ocurrence patterns.
Héctor Martínez Alonso, Anders Johannsen, Sanni Nimb, Sussi Olsen, Bolette S. Pedersen
GWC2
2016 Multilingual Projection for Parsing Truly Low-Resource Languages
abstract
We propose a novel approach to cross-lingual part-of-speech tagging and dependency parsing for truly low-resource languages. Our annotation projection-based approach yields tagging and parsing models for over 100 languages. All that is needed are freely available parallel texts, and taggers and parsers for resource-rich languages. The empirical evaluation across 30 test languages shows that our method consistently provides top-level accuracies, close to established upper bounds, and outperforms several competitive baselines.
Zeljko Agic, Anders Johannsen, Barbara Plank, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Natalie Schluter, Anders Søgaard
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2015 Inverted indexing for cross-lingual NLP
abstract
Anders Søgaard, Željko Agić, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Barbara Plank, Bernd Bohnet, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015.
Anders Søgaard, Zeljko Agic, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Barbara Plank, Bernd Bohnet, Anders Johannsen
ACL (1)6
2015 Cross-lingual syntactic variation over age and gender
abstract
Most computational sociolinguistics studies have focused on phonological and lexical variation.We present the first large-scale study of syntactic variation among demographic groups (age and gender) across several languages.We harvest data from online user-review sites and parse it with universal dependencies.We show that several age and gender-specific variations hold across languages, for example that women are more likely to use VP conjunctions.
Anders Johannsen, Dirk Hovy, Anders Søgaard
CoNLL1
2015 Any-language frame-semantic parsing
abstract
We present a multilingual corpus of Wikipedia and Twitter texts annotated with FRAMENET 1.5 semantic frames in nine different languages, as well as a novel technique for weakly supervised cross-lingual frame-semantic parsing. Our approach only assumes the existence of linked, comparable source and target lan-guage corpora (e.g., Wikipedia) and a bilingual dictionary (e.g., Wiktionary or BABELNET). Our approach uses a truly interlingual representation, enabling us to use the same model across all nine lan-guages. We present average error reduc-tions over running a state-of-the-art parser on word-to-word translations of 46 % for target identification, 37 % for frame identi-fication, and 14 % for argument identifica-tion. 1
Anders Johannsen, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Anders Søgaard
EMNLP1
2015 User Review Sites as a Resource for Large-Scale Sociolinguistic Studies
abstract
Sociolinguistic studies investigate the relation between language and extra-linguistic variables. This requires both representative text data and the associated socio-economic meta-data of the subjects. Traditionally, sociolinguistic studies use small samples of hand-curated data and meta-data. This can lead to exaggerated or false conclusions. Using social media data offers a large-scale source of language data, but usually lacks reliable socio-economic meta-data. Our research aims to remedy both problems by exploring a large new data source, international review websites with user profiles. They provide more text data than manually collected studies, and more meta-data than most available social media text. We describe the data and present various pilot studies, illustrating the usefulness of this resource for sociolinguistic studies. Our approach can help generate new research hypotheses based on data-driven findings across several countries and languages.
Dirk Hovy, Anders Johannsen, Anders Søgaard
WWW2
2014 What's in a p-value in NLP?
abstract
In NLP, we need to document that our pro-posed methods perform significantly bet-ter with respect to standard metrics than previous approaches, typically by re-porting p-values obtained by rank- or randomization-based tests. We show that significance results following current re-search standards are unreliable and, in ad-dition, very sensitive to sample size, co-variates such as sentence length, as well as to the existence of multiple metrics. We estimate that under the assumption of per-fect metrics and unbiased data, we need a significance cut-off at ⇠0.0025 to reduce the risk of false positive results to <5%. Since in practice we often have consider-able selection bias and poor metrics, this, however, will not do alone. 1
Anders Søgaard, Anders Johannsen, Barbara Plank, Dirk Hovy, Héctor Martínez Alonso
CoNLL2
2014 Importance weighting and unsupervised domain adaptation of POS taggers: a negative result
abstract
Importance weighting is a generalization of various statistical bias correction techniques.While our labeled data in NLP is heavily biased, importance weighting has seen only few applications in NLP, most of them relying on a small amount of labeled target data.The publication bias toward reporting positive results makes it hard to say whether researchers have tried.This paper presents a negative result on unsupervised domain adaptation for POS tagging.In this setup, we only have unlabeled data and thus only indirect access to the bias in emission and transition probabilities.Moreover, most errors in POS tagging are due to unseen words, and there, importance weighting cannot help.We present experiments with a wide variety of weight functions, quantilizations, as well as with randomly generated weights, to support these claims.
Barbara Plank, Anders Johannsen, Anders Søgaard
EMNLP2
2013 Using Crowdsourcing to get Representations based on Regular Expressions
abstract
Often the bottleneck in document classification is finding good representations that zoom in on the most important aspects of the documents.Most research uses n-gram representations, but relevant features often occur discontinuously, e.g., not. . .good in sentiment analysis.In this paper we present experiments getting experts to provide regular expressions, as well as crowdsourced annotation tasks from which regular expressions can be derived.Somewhat surprisingly, it turns out that these crowdsourced feature combinations outperform automatic feature combination methods, as well as expert features, by a very large margin and reduce error by 24-41% over n-gram representations.
Anders Søgaard, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Jakob Elming, Anders Johannsen
EMNLP4
2013 Cross-Domain Answer Ranking using Importance Sampling
Anders Johannsen, Anders Søgaard
IJCNLP1
2013 Disambiguating Explicit Discourse Connectives without Oracles
Anders Johannsen, Anders Søgaard
IJCNLP1
2013 Down-stream effects of tree-to-dependency conversions
Jakob Elming, Anders Johannsen, Sigrid Klerke, Emanuele Lapponi, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Anders Søgaard
HLT-NAACL2
2012 Creation and use of Language Resources in a Question-Answering eHealth System
Ulrich Andersen, Anna Braasch, Lina Henriksen, Csaba Huszka, Anders Johannsen, Lars Kayser, Bente Maegaard, Ole Norgaard, Stefan Schulz 0001, Jürgen Wedekind
LREC5