Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anders Johannsen
dblp:94/8340
· DBLP profile ↗
19ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 31% Information extraction and text analysis · 26% Question answering and dialogue systems · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution · ACL (1) 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
planning evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020 Any-language frame-semantic parsing · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue understanding
conversational semantic parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
dialogue state tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
cross-lingual NLP |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Inverted indexing for cross-lingual NLP · ACL (1) 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
frame-semantic parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Any-language frame-semantic parsing · EMNLP 2015 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
sociolinguistics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | User Review Sites as a Resource for Large-Scale Sociolinguistic Studies · WWW 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Importance weighting and unsupervised domain adaptation of POS taggers: a negative result · EMNLP 2014 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Importance weighting and unsupervised domain adaptation of POS taggers: a negative result · EMNLP 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Using Crowdsourcing to get Representations based on Regular Expressions · EMNLP 2013 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Any-language frame-semantic parsing · EMNLP 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
crowdsourcing |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Using Crowdsourcing to get Representations based on Regular Expressions · EMNLP 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulated environment · 0.9weakly supervised learning · 0.2inverted indexing · 0.2interlingual representation · 0.2bilingual dictionary · 0.2quantilization · 0.2importance weighting · 0.2regular expression extraction · 0.2crowdsourcing · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action ExecutionabstractAlexandru Coca, Mark Gaynor, Zhenxing Zhang, Jianpeng Cheng, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Hector Martinez Alonso, Diarmuid O Seaghdha, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Alexandru Coca, Mark Gaynor, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen |
ACL (1) | 9 |
| 2025 | PyTOD: Programmable Task-Oriented Dialogue with Execution FeedbackabstractProgrammable task-oriented dialogue (TOD) agents enable language models to follow structured dialogue policies, but their effectiveness hinges on accurate dialogue state tracking (DST). We present PyTOD, an agent that generates executable code to track dialogue state and uses policy and execution feedback for efficient error correction. To achieve this, PyTOD employs a simple constrained decoding approach, using a language model instead of grammar rules to follow API schemata. This leads to state-of-the-art DST performance on the challenging SGD benchmark. Our experiments show that PyTOD surpasses strong baselines in both accuracy and cross-turn consistency, demonstrating the effectiveness of execution-aware state tracking. Alexandru Coca, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Mark Gaynor, Joe Stacey, Tristan Guigue, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen |
SIGDIAL | 11 |
| 2024 | Effective and Efficient Conversation Retrieval for Dialogue State Tracking with Implicit Text SummariesabstractSeanie Lee, Jianpeng Cheng, Joris Driesen, Alexandru Coca, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Seanie Lee, Jianpeng Cheng 0002, Joris Driesen, Alexandru Coca, Anders Johannsen |
NAACL-HLT | 5 |
| 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State TrackingabstractJianpeng Cheng, Devang Agrawal, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Shruti Bhargava, Joris Driesen, Federico Flego, Dain Kaplan, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Lin Li, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Jason D. Williams, Hong Yu, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Jianpeng Cheng 0002, Devang Agrawal, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Shruti Bhargava, Joris Driesen, Federico Flego, Dain Kaplan, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Jason D. Williams, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen |
EMNLP (1) | 14 |
| 2016 | Exploring Language Variation Across Europe - A Web-based Tool for Computational Sociolinguistics
Dirk Hovy, Anders Johannsen |
LREC | 2 |
| 2016 | The SemDaX Corpus ― Sense Annotations with Scalable Sense Inventories
Bolette S. Pedersen, Anna Braasch, Anders Johannsen, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Sanni Nimb, Sussi Olsen, Anders Søgaard, Nicolai Hartvig Sørensen |
LREC | 3 |
| 2016 | An empirically grounded expansion of the supersense inventoryabstractIn this article we present an expansion of the supersense inventory.All new supersenses are extensions of members of the current inventory, which we postulate by identifying semantically coherent groups of synsets.We cover the expansion of the already-established supernsense inventory for nouns and verbs, the addition of coarse supersenses for adjectives in absence of a canonical supersense inventory, and supersenses for verbal satellites.We evaluate the viability of the new senses examining the annotation agreement, frequency and co-ocurrence patterns. Héctor Martínez Alonso, Anders Johannsen, Sanni Nimb, Sussi Olsen, Bolette S. Pedersen |
GWC | 2 |
| 2016 | Multilingual Projection for Parsing Truly Low-Resource LanguagesabstractWe propose a novel approach to cross-lingual part-of-speech tagging and dependency parsing for truly low-resource languages. Our annotation projection-based approach yields tagging and parsing models for over 100 languages. All that is needed are freely available parallel texts, and taggers and parsers for resource-rich languages. The empirical evaluation across 30 test languages shows that our method consistently provides top-level accuracies, close to established upper bounds, and outperforms several competitive baselines. Zeljko Agic, Anders Johannsen, Barbara Plank, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Natalie Schluter, Anders Søgaard |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2015 | Inverted indexing for cross-lingual NLPabstractAnders Søgaard, Željko Agić, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Barbara Plank, Bernd Bohnet, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015. Anders Søgaard, Zeljko Agic, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Barbara Plank, Bernd Bohnet, Anders Johannsen |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2015 | Cross-lingual syntactic variation over age and genderabstractMost computational sociolinguistics studies have focused on phonological and lexical variation.We present the first large-scale study of syntactic variation among demographic groups (age and gender) across several languages.We harvest data from online user-review sites and parse it with universal dependencies.We show that several age and gender-specific variations hold across languages, for example that women are more likely to use VP conjunctions. Anders Johannsen, Dirk Hovy, Anders Søgaard |
CoNLL | 1 |
| 2015 | Any-language frame-semantic parsingabstractWe present a multilingual corpus of Wikipedia and Twitter texts annotated with FRAMENET 1.5 semantic frames in nine different languages, as well as a novel technique for weakly supervised cross-lingual frame-semantic parsing. Our approach only assumes the existence of linked, comparable source and target lan-guage corpora (e.g., Wikipedia) and a bilingual dictionary (e.g., Wiktionary or BABELNET). Our approach uses a truly interlingual representation, enabling us to use the same model across all nine lan-guages. We present average error reduc-tions over running a state-of-the-art parser on word-to-word translations of 46 % for target identification, 37 % for frame identi-fication, and 14 % for argument identifica-tion. 1 Anders Johannsen, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Anders Søgaard |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2015 | User Review Sites as a Resource for Large-Scale Sociolinguistic StudiesabstractSociolinguistic studies investigate the relation between language and extra-linguistic variables. This requires both representative text data and the associated socio-economic meta-data of the subjects. Traditionally, sociolinguistic studies use small samples of hand-curated data and meta-data. This can lead to exaggerated or false conclusions. Using social media data offers a large-scale source of language data, but usually lacks reliable socio-economic meta-data. Our research aims to remedy both problems by exploring a large new data source, international review websites with user profiles. They provide more text data than manually collected studies, and more meta-data than most available social media text. We describe the data and present various pilot studies, illustrating the usefulness of this resource for sociolinguistic studies. Our approach can help generate new research hypotheses based on data-driven findings across several countries and languages. Dirk Hovy, Anders Johannsen, Anders Søgaard |
WWW | 2 |
| 2014 | What's in a p-value in NLP?abstractIn NLP, we need to document that our pro-posed methods perform significantly bet-ter with respect to standard metrics than previous approaches, typically by re-porting p-values obtained by rank- or randomization-based tests. We show that significance results following current re-search standards are unreliable and, in ad-dition, very sensitive to sample size, co-variates such as sentence length, as well as to the existence of multiple metrics. We estimate that under the assumption of per-fect metrics and unbiased data, we need a significance cut-off at ⇠0.0025 to reduce the risk of false positive results to <5%. Since in practice we often have consider-able selection bias and poor metrics, this, however, will not do alone. 1 Anders Søgaard, Anders Johannsen, Barbara Plank, Dirk Hovy, Héctor Martínez Alonso |
CoNLL | 2 |
| 2014 | Importance weighting and unsupervised domain adaptation of POS taggers: a negative resultabstractImportance weighting is a generalization of various statistical bias correction techniques.While our labeled data in NLP is heavily biased, importance weighting has seen only few applications in NLP, most of them relying on a small amount of labeled target data.The publication bias toward reporting positive results makes it hard to say whether researchers have tried.This paper presents a negative result on unsupervised domain adaptation for POS tagging.In this setup, we only have unlabeled data and thus only indirect access to the bias in emission and transition probabilities.Moreover, most errors in POS tagging are due to unseen words, and there, importance weighting cannot help.We present experiments with a wide variety of weight functions, quantilizations, as well as with randomly generated weights, to support these claims. Barbara Plank, Anders Johannsen, Anders Søgaard |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2013 | Using Crowdsourcing to get Representations based on Regular ExpressionsabstractOften the bottleneck in document classification is finding good representations that zoom in on the most important aspects of the documents.Most research uses n-gram representations, but relevant features often occur discontinuously, e.g., not. . .good in sentiment analysis.In this paper we present experiments getting experts to provide regular expressions, as well as crowdsourced annotation tasks from which regular expressions can be derived.Somewhat surprisingly, it turns out that these crowdsourced feature combinations outperform automatic feature combination methods, as well as expert features, by a very large margin and reduce error by 24-41% over n-gram representations. Anders Søgaard, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Jakob Elming, Anders Johannsen |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2013 | Cross-Domain Answer Ranking using Importance Sampling
Anders Johannsen, Anders Søgaard |
IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2013 | Disambiguating Explicit Discourse Connectives without Oracles
Anders Johannsen, Anders Søgaard |
IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2013 | Down-stream effects of tree-to-dependency conversions
Jakob Elming, Anders Johannsen, Sigrid Klerke, Emanuele Lapponi, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Anders Søgaard |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2012 | Creation and use of Language Resources in a Question-Answering eHealth System
Ulrich Andersen, Anna Braasch, Lina Henriksen, Csaba Huszka, Anders Johannsen, Lars Kayser, Bente Maegaard, Ole Norgaard, Stefan Schulz 0001, Jürgen Wedekind |
LREC | 5 |