Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mina Karzand

dblp:94/8363 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-9673-4743ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 39% Learning theory · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 30%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 59% Approximation and online algorithms · 41%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
1.522026
Optimal Sequential Recommendations: Exploiting User and Item Structure · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026
Regret Bounds and Regimes of Optimality for User-User and Item-Item Collaborative Filtering · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
matrix factorization
1.012026
Optimal Sequential Recommendations: Exploiting User and Item Structure · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026
Recommender systems
online recommendation
1.012026
Optimal Sequential Recommendations: Exploiting User and Item Structure · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation
1.012026
Optimal Sequential Recommendations: Exploiting User and Item Structure · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization
0.512021
Representation Costs of Linear Neural Networks: Analysis and Design · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.512021
Representation Costs of Linear Neural Networks: Analysis and Design · NeurIPS 2021
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning
0.512021
Regret Bounds and Regimes of Optimality for User-User and Item-Item Collaborative Filtering · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds
0.512021
Regret Bounds and Regimes of Optimality for User-User and Item-Item Collaborative Filtering · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.112021
Representation Costs of Linear Neural Networks: Analysis and Design · NeurIPS 2021
Image and video processing › color image processing
color demosaicking
0.112010
Demosaicking by Alternating Projections: Theory and Fast One-Step Implementation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010
Image and video processing › image restoration
demosaicing
0.112010
Demosaicking by Alternating Projections: Theory and Fast One-Step Implementation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization
constrained quadratic optimization
0.112010
Demosaicking by Alternating Projections: Theory and Fast One-Step Implementation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.112010
Demosaicking by Alternating Projections: Theory and Fast One-Step Implementation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.012010
Demosaicking by Alternating Projections: Theory and Fast One-Step Implementation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user-user and item-item filtering · 1.0regret bounds · 1.0information-theoretic lower bounds · 1.0clustering · 1.0l2 regularization · 0.5group norm · 0.5elastic net · 0.5polyphase representation · 0.2contraction mapping analysis · 0.2alternating projections · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimal Sequential Recommendations: Exploiting User and Item Structure
abstract
We consider an online model for recommendation systems, with each user being recommended an item at each time-step and providing ’like’ or ’dislike’ feedback. A latent variable model specifies the user preferences: both users and items are clustered into types. The model captures structure in both the item and user spaces, as used by item-item and user-user collaborative filtering algorithms. We study the situation in which the type preference matrix has i.i.d. entries. Our main contribution is an algorithm that simultaneously uses both item and user structures, proved to be near-optimal via corresponding information-theoretic lower bounds. In particular, our analysis highlights the sub-optimality of using only one of item or user structure (as is done in most collaborative filtering algorithms).
Mina Karzand, Guy Bresler
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2021 Representation Costs of Linear Neural Networks: Analysis and Design
abstract
For different parameterizations (mappings from parameters to predictors), we study the regularization cost in predictor space induced by $l_2$ regularization on the parameters (weights). We focus on linear neural networks as parameterizations of linear predictors. We identify the representation cost of certain sparse linear ConvNets and residual networks. In order to get a better understanding of how the architecture and parameterization affect the representation cost, we also study the reverse problem, identifying which regularizers on linear predictors (e.g., $l_p$ norms, group norms, the $k$-support-norm, elastic net) can be the representation cost induced by simple $l_2$ regularization, and designing the parameterizations that do so.
Mina Karzand, Nathan Srebro
NeurIPS2
2021 Regret Bounds and Regimes of Optimality for User-User and Item-Item Collaborative Filtering
Guy Bresler, Mina Karzand
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2020 Minimax Prediction in Tree Ising Models
abstract
Graphical models are often used to facilitate efficient computation of posteriors in order to make predictions. With this objective in mind, we consider the problem of estimating the parameters of a graphical model with known structure from samples such that posteriors computed using the model are accurate. Focusing on tree-structured binary Markov random fields, our main result is a sharp characterization of the dependence on number of samples needed for all pairwise marginals (and hence posteriors of one variable given another) to be accurate: n = Θ(η-2log p) samples are necessary and sufficient to estimate model parameters such that all marginals of arbitrary order k are accurate to within √kη. The result implies that prediction error is bounded uniformly, with no dependence on the strength of interactions. We will also show that these guarantees are achievable using moment matching techniques.
Guy Bresler, Mina Karzand
ISIT2
2015 Communication strategies for low-latency trading
abstract
The possibility of latency arbitrage in financial markets has led to the deployment of high-speed communication links between distant financial centers. These links are noisy and so there is a need for coding. In this paper, we develop a game-theoretic model of trading behavior where two traders compete to capture latency arbitrage opportunities using binary signalling. Different coding schemes are strategies that trade off between reliability and latency. When one trader has a better channel, the second trader should not compete. With statistically identical channels, we find there are two different regimes of channel noise for which: there is a unique Nash equilibrium yielding ties; and there are two Nash equilibria with different winners.
Mina Karzand, Lav R. Varshney
ISIT1
2010 Demosaicking by Alternating Projections: Theory and Fast One-Step Implementation
abstract
Color image demosaicking is a key process in the digital imaging pipeline. In this paper, we study a well-known and influential demosaicking algorithm based upon alternating projections (AP), proposed by Gunturk, Altunbasak and Mersereau in 2002. Since its publication, the AP algorithm has been widely cited and compared against in a series of more recent papers in the demosaicking literature. Despite good performances, a limitation of the AP algorithm is its high computational complexity. We provide three main contributions in this paper. First, we present a rigorous analysis of the convergence property of the AP demosaicking algorithm, showing that it is a contraction mapping, with a unique fixed point. Second, we show that this fixed point is in fact the solution to a constrained quadratic minimization problem, thus, establishing the optimality of the AP algorithm. Finally, using the tool of polyphase representation, we show how to obtain the results of the AP algorithm in a single step, implemented as linear filtering in the polyphase domain. Replacing the original iterative procedure by the proposed one-step solution leads to substantial computational savings, by about an order of magnitude in our experiments.
Yue M. Lu, Mina Karzand, Martin Vetterli
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2