Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew Stephens
dblp:95/1253
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5397-9257ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 63% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22% Learning theory · 8% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 89% Computational science and engineering · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 50% Data mining · 50% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
empirical bayes |
1.8 | 3 | 2024 | A flexible empirical Bayes approach to multiple linear regression and connections with penalized regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Flexible Signal Denoising via Flexible Empirical Bayes Shrinkage · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
matrix factorization |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Covariate-moderated Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization · NeurIPS 2025 Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | A flexible empirical Bayes approach to multiple linear regression and connections with penalized regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Data mining
probabilistic model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covariate-moderated Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Recommender systems
side information integration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covariate-moderated Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell RNA sequencing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerated dimensionality reduction of single-cell RNA sequencing data with fastglmpca · Bioinform. 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Flexible Signal Denoising via Flexible Empirical Bayes Shrinkage · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › regularized estimation
shrinkage estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Flexible Signal Denoising via Flexible Empirical Bayes Shrinkage · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior distribution
sparsity prior |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution › evolutionary bioinformatics
ancient DNA analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Inference and visualization of DNA damage patterns using a grade of membership model · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial transcriptomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Covariate-moderated Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
empirical bayes |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Variance adaptive shrinkage (vash): flexible empirical Bayes estimation of variances · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Variance adaptive shrinkage (vash): flexible empirical Bayes estimation of variances · Bioinform. 2016 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization › regularized regression
lasso |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A flexible empirical Bayes approach to multiple linear regression and connections with penalized regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization
regularized regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A flexible empirical Bayes approach to multiple linear regression and connections with penalized regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
count data modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerated dimensionality reduction of single-cell RNA sequencing data with fastglmpca · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics › population genetics simulation
coalescent simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | msHOT: modifying Hudson's ms simulator to incorporate crossover and gene conversion hotspots · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | msHOT: modifying Hudson's ms simulator to incorporate crossover and gene conversion hotspots · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical bayes · 2.9neural network · 2.6variational approximation · 1.3wavelet transform · 1.0heteroskedasticity modeling · 1.0scale mixture of normals · 0.8principal component analysis · 0.8penalized regression · 0.8parallel computing · 0.8alternating poisson regression · 0.8normal means problem · 0.5topic model · 0.4grade of membership model · 0.4admixture model · 0.4unimodal distribution assumption · 0.2coalescent simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Covariate-moderated Empirical Bayes Matrix FactorizationabstractMatrix factorization is a fundamental method in statistics and machine learning for inferring and summarizing structure in multivariate data. Modern data sets often come with "side information" of various forms (images, text, graphs) that can be leveraged to improve estimation of the underlying structure. However, existing methods that leverage side information are limited in the types of data they can incorporate, and they assume specific parametric models. Here, we introduce a novel method for this problem, *covariate-moderated empirical Bayes matrix factorization* (cEBMF). cEBMF is a modular framework that accepts any type of side information that is processable by a probabilistic model or a neural network. The cEBMF framework can accommodate different assumptions and constraints on the factors through the use of different priors, and it adapts these priors to the data. We demonstrate the benefits of cEBMF in simulations and in analyses of spatial transcriptomics and collaborative filtering data. A PyTorch-based implementation of cEBMF with flexible priors is available at https://github.com/william-denault/cebmf_torch. William R. P. Denault, Karl Tayeb, Peter Carbonetto, Jason Willwerscheid, Matthew Stephens |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2024 | Accelerated dimensionality reduction of single-cell RNA sequencing data with fastglmpcaabstractSUMMARY: Motivated by theoretical and practical issues that arise when applying Principal component analysis (PCA) to count data, Townes et al. introduced "Poisson GLM-PCA", a variation of PCA adapted to count data, as a tool for dimensionality reduction of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. However, fitting GLM-PCA is computationally challenging. Here we study this problem, and show that a simple algorithm, which we call "Alternating Poisson Regression" (APR), produces better quality fits, and in less time, than existing algorithms. APR is also memory-efficient and lends itself to parallel implementation on multi-core processors, both of which are helpful for handling large scRNA-seq datasets. We illustrate the benefits of this approach in three publicly available scRNA-seq datasets. The new algorithms are implemented in an R package, fastglmpca. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The fastglmpca R package is released on CRAN for Windows, macOS and Linux, and the source code is available at github.com/stephenslab/fastglmpca under the open source GPL-3 license. Scripts to reproduce the results in this paper are also available in the GitHub repository and on Zenodo. Eric Weine, Peter Carbonetto, Matthew Stephens |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2024 | A flexible empirical Bayes approach to multiple linear regression and connections with penalized regressionabstractWe introduce a new empirical Bayes approach for large-scale multiple linear regression. Our approach combines two key ideas: (i) the use of flexible "adaptive shrinkage" priors, which approximate the nonparametric family of scale mixture of normal distributions by a finite mixture of normal distributions; and (ii) the use of variational approximations to efficiently estimate prior hyperparameters and compute approximate posteriors. Combining these two ideas results in fast and flexible methods, with computational speed comparable to fast penalized regression methods such as the Lasso, and with competitive prediction accuracy across a wide range of scenarios. Further, we provide new results that establish conceptual connections between our empirical Bayes methods and penalized methods. Specifically, we show that the posterior mean from our method solves a penalized regression problem, with the form of the penalty function being learned from the data by directly solving an optimization problem (rather than being tuned by cross-validation). Our methods are implemented in an R package, mr.ash.alpha, available from https://github.com/stephenslab/mr.ash.alpha. Peter Carbonetto, Matthew Stephens |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2021 | Empirical Bayes Matrix FactorizationabstractMatrix factorization methods, which include Factor analysis (FA) and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), are widely used for inferring and summarizing structure in multivariate data. Many such methods use a penalty or prior distribution to achieve sparse representations (“Sparse FA/PCA"), and a key question is how much sparsity to induce. Here we introduce a general Empirical Bayes approach to matrix factorization (EBMF), whose key feature is that it estimates the appropriate amount of sparsity by estimating prior distributions from the observed data. The approach is very flexible: it allows for a wide range of different prior families and allows that each component of the matrix factorization may exhibit a different amount of sparsity. The key to this flexibility is the use of a variational approximation, which we show effectively reduces fitting the EBMF model to solving a simpler problem, the so-called “normal means" problem. We demonstrate the benefits of EBMF with sparse priors through both numerical comparisons with competing methods and through analysis of data from the GTEx (Genotype Tissue Expression) project on genetic associations across 44 human tissues. In numerical comparisons EBMF often provides more accurate inferences than other methods. In the GTEx data, EBMF identifies interpretable structure that agrees with known relationships among human tissues. Software implementing our approach is available at https://github.com/stephenslab/flashr. Matthew Stephens |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2021 | Flexible Signal Denoising via Flexible Empirical Bayes ShrinkageabstractSignal denoising—also known as non-parametric regression—is often performed through shrinkage estimation in a transformed (e.g., wavelet) domain; shrinkage in the transformed domain corresponds to smoothing in the original domain. A key question in such applications is how much to shrink, or, equivalently, how much to smooth. Empirical Bayes shrinkage methods provide an attractive solution to this problem; they use the data to estimate a distribution of underlying "effects," hence automatically select an appropriate amount of shrinkage. However, most existing implementations of empirical Bayes shrinkage are less flexible than they could be—both in their assumptions on the underlying distribution of effects, and in their ability to handle heteroskedasticity—which limits their signal denoising applications. Here we address this by adopting a particularly flexible, stable and computationally convenient empirical Bayes shrinkage method and applying it to several signal denoising problems. These applications include smoothing of Poisson data and heteroskedastic Gaussian data. We show through empirical comparisons that the results are competitive with other methods, including both simple thresholding rules and purpose-built empirical Bayes procedures. Our methods are implemented in the R package smashr, "SMoothing by Adaptive SHrinkage in R," available at https://www.github.com/stephenslab/smashr. Zhengrong Xing, Peter Carbonetto, Matthew Stephens |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2019 | Inference and visualization of DNA damage patterns using a grade of membership modelabstractMOTIVATION: Quality control plays a major role in the analysis of ancient DNA (aDNA). One key step in this quality control is assessment of DNA damage: aDNA contains unique signatures of DNA damage that distinguish it from modern DNA, and so analyses of damage patterns can help confirm that DNA sequences obtained are from endogenous aDNA rather than from modern contamination. Predominant signatures of DNA damage include a high frequency of cytosine to thymine substitutions (C-to-T) at the ends of fragments, and elevated rates of purines (A & G) before the 5' strand-breaks. Existing QC procedures help assess damage by simply plotting for each sample, the C-to-T mismatch rate along the read and the composition of bases before the 5' strand-breaks. Here we present a more flexible and comprehensive model-based approach to infer and visualize damage patterns in aDNA, implemented in an R package aRchaic. This approach is based on a 'grade of membership' model (also known as 'admixture' or 'topic' model) in which each sample has an estimated grade of membership in each of K damage profiles that are estimated from the data. RESULTS: We illustrate aRchaic on data from several aDNA studies and modern individuals from 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012). Here, aRchaic clearly distinguishes modern from ancient samples irrespective of DNA extraction, lab and sequencing protocols. Additionally, through an in-silico contamination experiment, we show that the aRchaic grades of membership reflect relative levels of exogenous modern contamination. Together, the outputs of aRchaic provide a concise visual summary of DNA damage patterns, as well as other processes generating mismatches in the data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: aRchaic is available for download from https://www.github.com/kkdey/aRchaic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Hussein Al-Asadi, Kushal K. Dey, John Novembre, Matthew Stephens |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2018 | A new sequence logo plot to highlight enrichment and depletionabstractBACKGROUND: Sequence logo plots have become a standard graphical tool for visualizing sequence motifs in DNA, RNA or protein sequences. However standard logo plots primarily highlight enrichment of symbols, and may fail to highlight interesting depletions. Current alternatives that try to highlight depletion often produce visually cluttered logos. RESULTS: We introduce a new sequence logo plot, the EDLogo plot, that highlights both enrichment and depletion, while minimizing visual clutter. We provide an easy-to-use and highly customizable R package Logolas to produce a range of logo plots, including EDLogo plots. This software also allows elements in the logo plot to be strings of characters, rather than a single character, extending the range of applications beyond the usual DNA, RNA or protein sequences. And the software includes new Empirical Bayes methods to stabilize estimates of enrichment and depletion, and thus better highlight the most significant patterns in data. We illustrate our methods and software on applications to transcription factor binding site motifs, protein sequence alignments and cancer mutation signature profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Our new EDLogo plots and flexible software implementation can help data analysts visualize both enrichment and depletion of characters (DNA sequence bases, amino acids, etc.) across a wide range of applications. Kushal K. Dey, Dongyue Xie, Matthew Stephens |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2016 | Variance adaptive shrinkage (vash): flexible empirical Bayes estimation of variancesabstractMOTIVATION: Genomic studies often involve estimation of variances of thousands of genes (or other genomic units) from just a few measurements on each. For example, variance estimation is an important step in gene expression analyses aimed at identifying differentially expressed genes. A common approach to this problem is to use an Empirical Bayes (EB) method that assumes the variances among genes follow an inverse-gamma distribution. This distributional assumption is relatively inflexible; for example, it may not capture 'outlying' genes whose variances are considerably bigger than usual. Here we describe a more flexible EB method, capable of capturing a much wider range of distributions. Indeed, the main assumption is that the distribution of the variances is unimodal (or, as an alternative, that the distribution of the precisions is unimodal). We argue that the unimodal assumption provides an attractive compromise between flexibility, computational tractability and statistical efficiency. RESULTS: We show that this more flexible approach provides competitive performance with existing methods when the variances truly come from an inverse-gamma distribution, and can outperform them when the distribution of the variances is more complex. In analyses of several human gene expression datasets from the Genotype Tissues Expression consortium, we find that our more flexible model often fits the data appreciably better than the single inverse gamma distribution. At the same time we find that in these data this improved model fit leads to only small improvements in variance estimates and detection of differentially expressed genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our methods are implemented in an R package vashr available from http://github.com/mengyin/vashr CONTACT: [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Mengyin Lu, Matthew Stephens |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2007 | msHOT: modifying Hudson's ms simulator to incorporate crossover and gene conversion hotspotsabstractUNLABELLED: We have incorporated both crossover and gene conversion hotspots into an existing coalescent-based program for simulating genetic variation data for a sample of chromosomes from a population. AVAILABILITY: The source code for msHOT is available at http://home.uchicago.edu/~rhudson1, along with accompanying instructions. Garrett Hellenthal, Matthew Stephens |
Bioinform. | 2 |