Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kemal Oflazer

dblp:95/1344 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
56ranked-venue papers
15as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4977-0079ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 53 · 15 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
10 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 38% Machine translation · 28% Language models and text generation · 27%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 95% Database system architecture and tuning · 5%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis
0.712023
Counting the Bugs in ChatGPT's Wugs: A Multilingual Investigation into the Morphological Capabilities of a Large Language Model · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models › multilingual evaluation
multilingual language model evaluation
0.712023
Counting the Bugs in ChatGPT's Wugs: A Multilingual Investigation into the Morphological Capabilities of a Large Language Model · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.222010
Exploiting Morphology and Local Word Reordering in English-to-Turkish Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Syntax-to-Morphology Mapping in Factored Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation from English to Turkish · ACL 2010
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
language model probing
0.212023
Counting the Bugs in ChatGPT's Wugs: A Multilingual Investigation into the Morphological Capabilities of a Large Language Model · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation
0.212014
A Human Judgement Corpus and a Metric for Arabic MT Evaluation · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
morphology-aware translation
0.112010
Exploiting Morphology and Local Word Reordering in English-to-Turkish Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
phrase-based translation
0.112010
Exploiting Morphology and Local Word Reordering in English-to-Turkish Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
grammar engineering
0.112006
Morphology-Syntax Interface for Turkish LFG · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › grammar-based parsing
lexical-functional grammar
0.112006
Morphology-Syntax Interface for Turkish LFG · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphological disambiguation
0.021997
Morphological Disambiguation by Voting Constraints · ACL 1997
Combining Hand-crafted Rules and Unsupervised Learning in Constraint-based Morphological Disambiguation · EMNLP 1996
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.012010
Exploiting Morphology and Local Word Reordering in English-to-Turkish Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.011999
Dependency Parsing with an Extended Finite State Approach · ACL 1999
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › grammar-based parsing
finite-state parsing
0.011999
Dependency Parsing with an Extended Finite State Approach · ACL 1999
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.011999
Dependency Parsing with an Extended Finite State Approach · ACL 1999
Information retrieval
tree-based retrieval
0.011997
Error-Tolerant Retrieval of Trees · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
example-based machine translation
0.011997
Error-Tolerant Retrieval of Trees · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.011997
Morphological Disambiguation by Voting Constraints · ACL 1997
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms
0.011982
MISE: Machine for In-System Evaluation of Custom VLSI Chips for Real-Time Systems · RTSS 1982
Database system architecture and tuning
database machine
0.011978
Microprocessor Based Modular Database Processors · VLDB 1978
Integrated circuit design › VLSI design
custom VLSI design
0.011982
MISE: Machine for In-System Evaluation of Custom VLSI Chips for Real-Time Systems · RTSS 1982
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.011982
MISE: Machine for In-System Evaluation of Custom VLSI Chips for Real-Time Systems · RTSS 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multilingual probing · 0.7morphological generalization testing · 0.7METEOR · 0.2BLEU adaptation · 0.2word-based language model · 0.1n-best re-ranking · 0.1morpheme-based language model · 0.1factored translation model · 0.1finite state filters · 0.0extended finite state approach · 0.0tree edit distance · 0.0in-system evaluation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Abstractive summarization with deep reinforcement learning using semantic similarity rewards
abstract
Abstract Abstractive summarization is an approach to document summarization that is not limited to selecting sentences from the document but can generate new sentences as well. We address the two main challenges in abstractive summarization: how to evaluate the performance of a summarization model and what is a good training objective. We first introduce new evaluation measures based on the semantic similarity of the input and corresponding summary. The similarity scores are obtained by the fine-tuned BERTurk model using either the cross-encoder or a bi-encoder architecture. The fine-tuning is done on the Turkish Natural Language Inference and Semantic Textual Similarity benchmark datasets. We show that these measures have better correlations with human evaluations compared to Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) scores and BERTScore. We then introduce a deep reinforcement learning algorithm that uses the proposed semantic similarity measures as rewards, together with a mixed training objective, in order to generate more natural summaries in terms of human readability. We show that training with a mixed training objective function compared to only the maximum-likelihood objective improves similarity scores.
Figen Beken Fikri, Kemal Oflazer, Berrin A. Yanikoglu
Nat. Lang. Eng.2
2023 Counting the Bugs in ChatGPT's Wugs: A Multilingual Investigation into the Morphological Capabilities of a Large Language Model
abstract
Leonie Weissweiler, Valentin Hofmann, Anjali Kantharuban, Anna Cai, Ritam Dutt, Amey Hengle, Anubha Kabra, Atharva Kulkarni, Abhishek Vijayakumar, Haofei Yu, Hinrich Schuetze, Kemal Oflazer, David Mortensen. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.
Leonie Weissweiler, Valentin Hofmann, Anjali Kantharuban, Anna Cai, Ritam Dutt, Amey Hengle, Anubha Kabra, Atharva Kulkarni, Abhishek Vijayakumar, Haofei Yu, Hinrich Schütze, Kemal Oflazer, David R. Mortensen
EMNLP12
2018 The MADAR Arabic Dialect Corpus and Lexicon
Houda Bouamor, Nizar Habash, Mohammad Salameh, Wajdi Zaghouani, Owen Rambow, Dana Abdulrahim, Ossama Obeid, Salam Khalifa, Fadhl Eryani, Alexander Erdmann, Kemal Oflazer
LREC11
2018 MADARi: A Web Interface for Joint Arabic Morphological Annotation and Spelling Correction
Ossama Obeid, Salam Khalifa, Nizar Habash, Houda Bouamor, Wajdi Zaghouani, Kemal Oflazer
LREC6
2017 Sentiment analysis in Turkish at different granularity levels
abstract
Abstract Sentiment analysis has attracted a lot of research interest in recent years, especially in the context of social media. While most of this research has focused on English, there is ample data and interest in the topic for many other languages, as well. In this article, we propose a comprehensive sentiment analysis system for Turkish. We cover different levels of sentiment analysis such as aspect, sentence, and document levels as well as some linguistic issues such as conjunction and intensification in Turkish sentiment analysis. Our system is evaluated on Turkish movie reviews and the obtained accuracies range from sixty per cent to seventy-nine per cent in ternary and binary classification tasks at different levels of analysis.
Rahim Dehkharghani, Berrin A. Yanikoglu, Yücel Saygin, Kemal Oflazer
Nat. Lang. Eng.4
2016 Guidelines and Framework for a Large Scale Arabic Diacritized Corpus
Wajdi Zaghouani, Houda Bouamor, Abdelati Hawwari, Mona T. Diab, Ossama Obeid, Mahmoud Ghoneim, Sawsan Alqahtani, Kemal Oflazer
LREC8
2016 Building an Arabic Machine Translation Post-Edited Corpus: Guidelines and Annotation
Wajdi Zaghouani, Nizar Habash, Ossama Obeid, Behrang Mohit, Houda Bouamor, Kemal Oflazer
LREC6
2014 A Human Judgement Corpus and a Metric for Arabic MT Evaluation
abstract
We present a human judgments dataset and an adapted metric for evaluation of Arabic machine translation.Our mediumscale dataset is the first of its kind for Arabic with high annotation quality.We use the dataset to adapt the BLEU score for Arabic.Our score (AL-BLEU) provides partial credits for stem and morphological matchings of hypothesis and reference words.We evaluate BLEU, METEOR and AL-BLEU on our human judgments corpus and show that AL-BLEU has the highest correlation with human judgments.We are releasing the dataset and software to the research community.
Houda Bouamor, Hanan Alshikhabobakr, Behrang Mohit, Kemal Oflazer
EMNLP4
2014 A Multidialectal Parallel Corpus of Arabic
Houda Bouamor, Nizar Habash, Kemal Oflazer
LREC3
2014 YouDACC: the Youtube Dialectal Arabic Comment Corpus
Ahmed Salama, Houda Bouamor, Behrang Mohit, Kemal Oflazer
LREC4
2014 Large Scale Arabic Error Annotation: Guidelines and Framework
Wajdi Zaghouani, Behrang Mohit, Nizar Habash, Ossama Obeid, Nadi Tomeh, Alla Rozovskaya, Noura Farra, Sarah Alkuhlani, Kemal Oflazer
LREC9
2013 An English Reading Tool as a NLP Showcase
Mahmoud Azab, Ahmed Salama, Kemal Oflazer, Hideki Shima 0001, Jun Araki, Teruko Mitamura
IJCNLP3
2013 SuMT: A Framework of Summarization and MT
Houda Bouamor, Behrang Mohit, Kemal Oflazer
IJCNLP3
2013 A Web-based Annotation Framework For Large-Scale Text Correction
Ossama Obeid, Wajdi Zaghouani, Behrang Mohit, Nizar Habash, Kemal Oflazer, Nadi Tomeh
IJCNLP5
2013 Dudley North visits North London: Learning When to Transliterate to Arabic
Mahmoud Azab, Houda Bouamor, Behrang Mohit, Kemal Oflazer
HLT-NAACL4
2013 Simultaneous Word-Morpheme Alignment for Statistical Machine Translation
Elif Eyigöz, Daniel Gildea, Kemal Oflazer
HLT-NAACL3
2013 Supersense Tagging for Arabic: the MT-in-the-Middle Attack
Nathan Schneider 0001, Behrang Mohit, Chris Dyer, Kemal Oflazer, Noah A. Smith
HLT-NAACL4
2012 Recall-Oriented Learning of Named Entities in Arabic Wikipedia
Behrang Mohit, Nathan Schneider 0001, Rishav Bhowmick, Kemal Oflazer, Noah A. Smith
EACL4
2012 Annotating and Learning Morphological Segmentation of Egyptian Colloquial Arabic
Emad Mohamed, Behrang Mohit, Kemal Oflazer
LREC3
2011 Getting CS undergraduates to communicate effectively
abstract
In the last decade or so, the ACM, the IEEE and other organizations have acknowledged that there is a problem with the way communication is taught in the Computer Science curriculum: the writing, speaking, and presentation skills students learn in the classroom do not match what is expected of them in the workplace. The proposed solution, adopted by many undergraduate colleges, was to add a technical communication course to the CS curriculum. This does not appear to be enough, as mainstream accreditation boards are still emphasizing the need for improvement of communication skills instruction in their recent reports and recommendations. For the last two years, we have experimented with a complementary transversal approach where many "traditional CS" courses in our program have added a communication component to their syllabus, while at the same time our technical communication course has been revamped to expose students to realistic practices as promoted by situated learning theory. The results, so far anecdotal, point to improved student performance and attitude across several communication dimensions, in particular writing and presentation. We plan to develop this experiment by spreading it across more classes and by starting to collect rigorous measurements of students' communication performance.
Andreas Karatsolis, Iliano Cervesato, Khaled A. Harras, Yonina Cooper, Kemal Oflazer, Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh, Thierry Sans
ITiCSE5
2010 Syntax-to-Morphology Mapping in Factored Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation from English to Turkish
Reyyan Yeniterzi, Kemal Oflazer
ACL2
2010 Exploiting Morphology and Local Word Reordering in English-to-Turkish Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation
abstract
In this paper, we present the results of our work on the development of a phrase-based statistical machine translation prototype from English to Turkish—an agglutinative language with very productive inflectional and derivational morphology. We experiment with different morpheme-level representations for English–Turkish parallel texts. Additionally, to help with word alignment, we experiment with local word reordering on the English side, to bring the word order of specific English prepositional phrases and auxiliary verb complexes, in line with the morpheme order of the corresponding case-marked nouns and complex verbs, on the Turkish side. To alleviate the dearth of the parallel data available, we also augment the training data with sentences just with content word roots obtained from the original training data to bias root word alignment, and with highly reliable phrase-pairs from an earlier corpus alignment. We use a morpheme-based language model in decoding and a word-based language model in re-ranking the$n$-best lists generated by the decoder. Lastly, we present a scheme forrepairingthe decoder output bycorrectingwords which have incorrect morphological structure or which are out-of-vocabulary with respect to the training data and language model, to further improve the translations. We improve from 15.53 BLEU points for our word-based baseline model to 25.17 BLEU points for an improvement of 9.64 points or about 62% relative.
Ilknur Durgar El-Kahlout, Kemal Oflazer
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.2
2008 Statistical Machine Translation into a Morphologically Complex Language
Kemal Oflazer
CICLing1
2008 BLEU+: a Tool for Fine-Grained BLEU Computation
A. Cüneyd Tantug, Kemal Oflazer, Ilknur Durgar El-Kahlout
LREC2
2008 Dependency Parsing of Turkish
abstract
The suitability of different parsing methods for different languages is an important topic in syntactic parsing. Especially lesser-studied languages, typologically different from the languages for which methods have originally been developed, pose interesting challenges in this respect. This article presents an investigation of data-driven dependency parsing of Turkish, an agglutinative, free constituent order language that can be seen as the representative of a wider class of languages of similar type. Our investigations show that morphological structure plays an essential role in finding syntactic relations in such a language. In particular, we show that employing sublexical units called inflectional groups, rather than word forms, as the basic parsing units improves parsing accuracy. We test our claim on two different parsing methods, one based on a probabilistic model with beam search and the other based on discriminative classifiers and a deterministic parsing strategy, and show that the usefulness of sublexical units holds regardless of the parsing method. We examine the impact of morphological and lexical information in detail and show that, properly used, this kind of information can improve parsing accuracy substantially. Applying the techniques presented in this article, we achieve the highest reported accuracy for parsing the Turkish Treebank.
Gülsen Eryigit, Joakim Nivre, Kemal Oflazer
Comput. Linguistics3
2008 Dependency Parsing of Turkish
abstract
The suitability of different parsing methods for different languages is an important topic in syntactic parsing. Especially lesser-studied languages, typologically different from the languages for which methods have originally been developed, pose interesting challenges in this respect. This article presents an investigation of data-driven dependency parsing of Turkish, an agglutinative, free constituent order language that can be seen as the representative of a wider class of languages of similar type. Our investigations show that morphological structure plays an essential role in finding syntactic relations in such a language. In particular, we show that employing sublexical units called inflectional groups, rather than word forms, as the basic parsing units improves parsing accuracy. We test our claim on two different parsing methods, one based on a probabilistic model with beam search and the other based on discriminative classifiers and a deterministic parsing strategy, and show that the usefulness of sublexical units holds regardless of the parsing method. We examine the impact of morphological and lexical information in detail and show that, properly used, this kind of information can improve parsing accuracy substantially. Applying the techniques presented in this article, we achieve the highest reported accuracy for parsing the Turkish Treebank.
Gülsen Eryigit, Joakim Nivre, Kemal Oflazer
Comput. Linguistics3
2007 Machine Translation between Turkic Languages
A. Cüneyd Tantug, Esref Adali, Kemal Oflazer
ACL3
2007 A MT system from Turkmen to Turkish employing finite state and statistical methods
A. Cüneyd Tantug, Esref Adali, Kemal Oflazer
MTSummit3
2006 Morphology-Syntax Interface for Turkish LFG
abstract
This paper investigates the use of sublexical units as a solution to handling the complex morphology with productive derivational processes, in the development of a lexical functional grammar for Turkish.Such sublexical units make it possible to expose the internal structure of words with multiple derivations to the grammar rules in a uniform manner.This in turn leads to more succinct and manageable rules.Further, the semantics of the derivations can also be systematically reflected in a compositional way by constructing PRED values on the fly.We illustrate how we use sublexical units for handling simple productive derivational morphology and more interesting cases such as causativization, etc., which change verb valency.Our priority is to handle several linguistic phenomena in order to observe the effects of our approach on both the c-structure and the f-structure representation, and grammar writing, leaving the coverage and evaluation issues aside for the moment.
Özlem Çetinoglu, Kemal Oflazer
ACL2
2006 Statistical Dependency Parsing for Turkish
Gülsen Eryigit, Kemal Oflazer
EACL2
2006 The architecture and the implementation of a finite state pronunciation lexicon for Turkish
Kemal Oflazer, Sharon Inkelas
Comput. Speech Lang.1
2003 A pronunciation lexicon for turkish based on two-level morphology
Kemal Oflazer, Sharon Inkelas
INTERSPEECH1
2003 Dependency Parsing with an Extended Finite-State Approach
abstract
This article presents a dependency parsing scheme using an extended finite-state approach. The parser augments input representation with “channels” so that links representing syntactic dependency relations among words can be accommodated and iterates on the input a number of times to arrive at a fixed point. Intermediate configurations violating various constraints of projective dependency representations such as no crossing links and no independent items except sentential head are filtered via finite-state filters. We have applied the parser to dependency parsing of Turkish.
Kemal Oflazer
Comput. Linguistics1
2003 Lenient morphological analysis
abstract
This paper presents a scheme that allows one to relax the all-or-none nature of two-level constraints in two-level morphology in a controlled manner, so that word forms with violations of some of the two-level constraints can be analyzed and ranked. The problem has been motivated by a recent phenomenon in Turkish with imported words that violate a fundamental assumption of Turkish that pronunciation and orthography have almost a one-to-one correspondence, and by a problem in Basque words with differing amounts of competence errors. We present the formulation of our proposal, and provide details of implementations for both problems using the XRCE Finite State Toolkit.
Kemal Oflazer
Nat. Lang. Eng.1
2003 A statistical information extraction system for Turkish
abstract
This paper presents the results of a study on information extraction from unrestricted Turkish text using statistical language processing methods. In languages like English, there is a very small number of possible word forms with a given root word. However, languages like Turkish have very productive agglutinative morphology. Thus, it is an issue to build statistical models for specific tasks using the surface forms of the words, mainly because of the data sparseness problem. In order to alleviate this problem, we used additional syntactic information, i.e. the morphological structure of the words. We have successfully applied statistical methods using both the lexical and morphological information to sentence segmentation, topic segmentation, and name tagging tasks. For sentence segmentation, we have modeled the final inflectional groups of the words and combined it with the lexical model, and decreased the error rate to 4.34%, which is 21% better than the result obtained using only the surface forms of the words. For topic segmentation, stems of the words (especially nouns) have been found to be more effective than using the surface forms of the words and we have achieved 10.90% segmentation error rate on our test set according to the weighted TDT-2 segmentation cost metric. This is 32% better than the word-based baseline model. For name tagging, we used four different information sources to model names. Our first information source is based on the surface forms of the words. Then we combined the contextual cues with the lexical model, and obtained some improvement. After this, we modeled the morphological analyses of the words, and finally we modeled the tag sequence, and reached an F-Measure of 91.56%, according to the MUC evaluation criteria. Our results are important in the sense that, using linguistic information, i.e. morphological analyses of the words, and a corpus large enough to train a statistical model significantly improves these basic information extraction tasks for Turkish.
Gökhan Tür, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Kemal Oflazer
Nat. Lang. Eng.3
2001 Bootstrapping Morphological Analyzers by Combining Human Elicitation and Machine Learning
abstract
This paper presents a semiautomatic technique for developing broad-coverage finite-state morphological analyzers for use in natural language processing applications. It consists of three components—elicitation of linguistic information from humans, a machine learning bootstrapping scheme, and a testing environment. The three components are applied iteratively until a threshold of output quality is attained. The initial application of this technique is for the morphology of low-density languages in the context of the Expedition project at NMSU Computing Research Laboratory. This elicit-build-test technique compiles lexical and inØectional information elicited from a human into a finite-state transducer lexicon and combines this with a sequence of morphographemic rewrite rules that is induced using transformation-based learning from the elicited examples. The resulting morphological analyzer is then tested against a test set, and any corrections are fed back into the learning procedure, which then builds an improved analyzer.
Kemal Oflazer, Sergei Nirenburg, Marjorie McShane
Comput. Linguistics1
2000 Statistical Morphological Disambiguation for Agglutinative Languages
Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Kemal Oflazer, Gökhan Tür
COLING2
2000 Introduction to the Special Issue on Finite State Methods in NLP
abstract
Americanae nace como un proyecto conjunto que surge dentro de la Red Europea de Información y Documentación sobre América Latina (REDIAL), y que ha afrontado la Biblioteca de la Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AECID). Esta nueva biblioteca virtual hace más accesibles los libros digitales de tema americanista a los investigadores y usuarios interesados de cualquier parte del mundo.
Lauri Karttunen, Kemal Oflazer
Comput. Linguistics2
1999 Dependency Parsing with an Extended Finite State Approach
abstract
This paper presents a dependency parsing scheme using an extended finite state approach. The parser augments input representation with "channels" so that links representing syntactic dependency relations among words can be accommodated, and iterates on the input a number of times to arrive at a fixed point. Intermediate configurations violating various constraints of projective dependency representations such as no crossing links, no independent items except sentential head, etc, are filtered via finite state filters. We have applied the parser to dependency parsing of Turkish.
Kemal Oflazer
ACL1
1998 Tactical generation in a free constituent order language
Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Kemal Oflazer
Nat. Lang. Eng.2
1997 Morphological Disambiguation by Voting Constraints
abstract
We present a constraint-based morphological disambiguation system in which individual constraints vote on matching morphological parses, and disambiguation of all the tokens in a sentence is performed at the end by selecting parses that receive the highest votes. This constraint application paradigm makes the outcome of the disambiguation independent of the rule sequence, and hence relieves the rule developer from worrying about potentially conflicting rule sequencing. Our results for disambiguating Turkish indicate that using about 500 constraint rules and some additional simple statistics, we can attain a recall of 95--96% and a precision of 94--95% with about 1.01 parses per token. Our system is implemented in Prolog and we are currently investigating an efficient implementation based on finite state transducers.
Kemal Oflazer, Gökhan Tür
ACL1
1997 Error-Tolerant Retrieval of Trees
abstract
We present an efficient algorithm for retrieving from a database of trees, all trees that differ from a given query tree by a small number additional or missing leaves, or leaf label changes. It has natural language processing applications in searching for matches in example-based translation systems, and retrieval from lexical databases containing entries of complex feature structures. For large randomly generated synthetic tree databases (some having tens of thousands of trees), and on databases constructed from Wall Street Journal treebank, it can retrieve for trees with a small error, in a matter of tenths of a second to about a second.
Kemal Oflazer
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1996 Error-tolerant Tree Matching
Kemal Oflazer
COLING1
1996 A Constraint-based Case Frame Lexicon
Kemal Oflazer, Okan Yilmaz
COLING1
1996 Combining Hand-crafted Rules and Unsupervised Learning in Constraint-based Morphological Disambiguation
Kemal Oflazer, Gökhan Tür
EMNLP1
1996 Tactical Generation in a Free Constituent Order Language
abstract
This paper describes tactical generation in Turkish, a free con~stituent order language, in which the order of the constituents may change according to the information structure of the sentences to be generated.In the absence of any information regarding the information structure of a sentence (i.e., topic, focus, background, etc.), the constituents of the sentence obey a default order, but the order is almost freely changeable, depending on the constraints of the text flow or discourse.We have used a recursively structured finite state machine for handling the changes in constituent order, implemented as a right-linear grammar backbone.Our implementation environment is the GenKit system, developed at Carnegie Mellon University-Center for Machine Translation.Morphological realization has been implemented using an external morpholggical analysis/generation component which performs concrete morpheme selection and handles morphographemic processes.
Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Kemal Oflazer, Ilyas Cicekli
INLG (1)2
1996 Error-tolerant Finite-state Recognition with Applications to Morphological Analysis and Spelling Correction
Kemal Oflazer
Comput. Linguistics1
1995 Parsing Turkish using the lexical functional grammar formalism
Zelal Güngördü, Kemal Oflazer
Mach. Transl.2
1994 Parsing Turkish Using The Lexical Functional Grammar Formalism
Zelal Güngördü, Kemal Oflazer
COLING2
1993 Two-level Description of Turkish Morphology
Kemal Oflazer
EACL1
1993 Solving tangram puzzles: A connectionist approach
abstract
We present a connectionist approach for solving Tangram puzzles. Tangram is an ancient Chinese puzzle where the object is to decompose a given figure into seven basic geometric figures. One connectionist approach models Tangram pieces and their possible placements and orientations as connectionist neuron units which receive excitatory connections from input units defining the puzzle and lateral inhibitory connections from competing or conflicting units. the network of these connectionist units, operating as a Boltzmann Machine, relaxes into a configuration in which units defining the solution receive no inhibitory input from other units. We present results from an implementation of our model using the Rochester Connectionist Simulator. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kemal Oflazer
Int. J. Intell. Syst.1
1993 A rotation, scaling, and translation invariant pattern classification system
Cem Yüceer, Kemal Oflazer
Pattern Recognit.2
1992 Parsing Agglutinative Word Structures And Its Application To Spelling Checking For Turkish
Aysin Solak, Kemal Oflazer
COLING2
1992 A rotation, scaling and translation invariant pattern classification system
abstract
Presents a hybrid pattern classification system which can classify patterns in a rotation, scaling, and translation invariant manner. The system is based on preprocessing the input image to map it into a rotation, scaling, and translation invariant canonical form, which is then classified by a multilayer feedforward neural net. Results from a number of classification problems are also presented in the paper.>
Cem Yüceer, Kemal Oflazer
ICPR (2)2
1982 MISE: Machine for In-System Evaluation of Custom VLSI Chips for Real-Time Systems
Roberto Bisiani, Michael J. Foster, H. T. Kung 0001, Kemal Oflazer
RTSS4
1978 Microprocessor Based Modular Database Processors
Esen A. Ozkarahan, Kemal Oflazer
VLDB2