EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zichao Li 0003
dblp:95/147-3
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 78% Reinforcement learning · 22% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text simplification |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Text Revision By On-the-Fly Representation Optimization · AAAI 2022 EditNTS: An Neural Programmer-Interpreter Model for Sentence Simplification through Explicit Editing · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
state abstraction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Do LLMs Build World Representations? Probing Through the Lens of State Abstraction · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text rewriting
text revision |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Text Revision By On-the-Fly Representation Optimization · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
content planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Do LLMs Build World Representations? Probing Through the Lens of State Abstraction · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
masked language modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Text Revision By On-the-Fly Representation Optimization · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probing · 0.8pre-training analysis · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8on-the-fly representation optimization · 0.6masked language modeling · 0.6attribute classification · 0.6sequence-to-sequence · 0.4neural programmer-interpreter · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Do LLMs Build World Representations? Probing Through the Lens of State AbstractionabstractHow do large language models (LLMs) encode the state of the world, including the status of entities and their relations, as described by a text? While existing work directly probes for a complete state of the world, our research explores whether and how LLMs abstract this world state in their internal representations. We propose a new framework for probing for world representations through the lens of state abstraction theory from reinforcement learning, which emphasizes different levels of abstraction, distinguishing between general abstractions that facilitate predicting future states and goal-oriented abstractions that guide the subsequent actions to accomplish tasks. To instantiate this framework, we design a text-based planning task, where an LLM acts as an agent in an environment and interacts with objects in containers to achieve a specified goal state. Our experiments reveal that fine-tuning as well as advanced pre-training strengthens LLM-built representations' tendency of maintaining goal-oriented abstractions during decoding, prioritizing task completion over recovery of the world's state and dynamics. Zichao Li 0003, Yanshuai Cao, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Text Revision By On-the-Fly Representation OptimizationabstractText revision refers to a family of natural language generation tasks, where the source and target sequences share moderate resemblance in surface form but differentiate in attributes, such as text formality and simplicity. Current state-of-the-art methods formulate these tasks as sequence-to-sequence learning problems, which rely on large-scale parallel training corpus. In this paper, we present an iterative in-place editing approach for text revision, which requires no parallel data. In this approach, we simply fine-tune a pre-trained Transformer with masked language modeling and attribute classification. During inference, the editing at each iteration is realized by two-step span replacement. At the first step, the distributed representation of the text optimizes on the fly towards an attribute function. At the second step, a text span is masked and another new one is proposed conditioned on the optimized representation. The empirical experiments on two typical and important text revision tasks, text formalization and text simplification, show the effectiveness of our approach. It achieves competitive and even better performance than state-of-the-art supervised methods on text simplification, and gains better performance than strong unsupervised methods on text formalization. Our code and model are released at https://github.com/jingjingli01/OREO. Jingjing Li 0007, Zichao Li 0003, Tao Ge 0001, Irwin King, Michael R. Lyu |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | EditNTS: An Neural Programmer-Interpreter Model for Sentence Simplification through Explicit EditingabstractWe present the first sentence simplification model that learns explicit edit operations (ADD, DELETE, and KEEP) via a neural programmer-interpreter approach.Most current neural sentence simplification systems are variants of sequence-to-sequence models adopted from machine translation.These methods learn to simplify sentences as a byproduct of the fact that they are trained on complex-simple sentence pairs.By contrast, our neural programmer-interpreter is directly trained to predict explicit edit operations on targeted parts of the input sentence, resembling the way that humans might perform simplification and revision.Our model outperforms previous state-of-the-art neural sentence simplification models (without external knowledge) by large margins on three benchmark text simplification corpora in terms of SARI (+0.95 WikiLarge, +1.89 WikiSmall, +1.41 Newsela), and is judged by humans to produce overall better and simpler output sentences 1 . Yue Dong 0002, Zichao Li 0003, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung |
ACL (1) | 2 |