Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zichao Li 0009
dblp:95/147-9
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Image recognition and object detection · 30% Generative modeling · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Can Shape Structure Features Improve Model Robustness under Diverse Adversarial Settings? · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Can Shape Structure Features Improve Model Robustness under Diverse Adversarial Settings? · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape recognition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Can Shape Structure Features Improve Model Robustness under Diverse Adversarial Settings? · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
GAN-based image reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Can Shape Structure Features Improve Model Robustness under Diverse Adversarial Settings? · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robust canny · 0.5edge detection · 0.5GAN · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Can Shape Structure Features Improve Model Robustness under Diverse Adversarial Settings?abstractRecent studies show that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are vulnerable under various settings, including adversarial attacks, common corruptions, and backdoor attacks. Motivated by the findings that human visual sys-tem pays more attention to global structure (e.g., shapes) for recognition while CNNs are biased towards local texture features in images, in this work we aim to analyze whether "edge features" could improve the recognition robustness in these scenarios, and if so, to what extent? To answer these questions and systematically evaluate the global structure features, we focus on shape features and pro-pose two edge-enabled pipelines EdgeNetRob and Edge-GANRob, forcing the CNNs to rely more on edge features. Specifically, EdgeNetRob and EdgeGANRob first explicitly extract shape structure features from a given image via an edge detection algorithm. Then EdgeNetRob trains down-stream learning tasks directly on the extracted edge features, while EdgeGANRob reconstructs a new image by refilling the texture information with a trained generative adversarial network (GANs). To reduce the sensitivity of edge detection algorithms to perturbations, we additionally propose a robust edge detection approach Robust Canny based on vanilla Canny. Based on our evaluation, we find that EdgeNetRob can help boost model robustness under different attack scenarios at the cost of the clean model accuracy. EdgeGANRob, on the other hand, is able to improve the clean model accuracy compared to EdgeNetRob while preserving the robustness. This shows that given such edge features, how to leverage them matters for robustness, and it also depends on data properties. Our systematic studies on edge structure features under different settings will shed light on future robust feature exploration and optimization. Mingjie Sun, Zichao Li 0009, Chaowei Xiao, Haonan Qiu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Mingyan Liu, Bo Li 0026 |
ICCV | 2 |