This paper focuses on how to design a Store Buffer (STB) well suited to first-level multibanked data caches. The goal is to forward data from in-flight stores into dependent loads within the latency of a cache bank. Taking into account the store lifetime in the processor pipeline and the data forwarding behavior, we propose a particular two-level STB design in which forwarding is done speculatively from a distributed first-level STB made of extremely small banks, whereas a centralized, second-level STB enforces correct store-load ordering. Besides, the two-level STB admits two simplifications that leave performance almost unchanged. Regarding the second-level STB, we suggest to remove its data forwarding capability, while for the first-level STB, it is possible to: 1) remove the instruction age checking and 2) compare only the less significant address bits. Experimentation covers both integer and floating point codes executing in dynamically scheduled processors. Following our guidelines and running SPEC-2K over an 8-way processor, a two-level STB with four 8-entry banks in the first level performs similar to an ideal, single-level STB with 128-entry banks working at the first-level cache latency. Also, we show that the proposed two-level design is suitable for a memory-latency-tolerant processor.

This paper focuses on how to design a store buffer (STB) well suited to first-level multibanked data caches. Our goal is to forward data from in-flight stores to dependent loads with the latency of a cache bank. For that we propose a particular two-level STB design in which forwarding is done speculatively from a distributed first-level STB made of extremely small banks, while a centralized, second-level STB enforces correct store-load ordering a few cycles later. To that end we have identified several important design decisions: i) delaying allocation of first-level STB entries until stores execute; ii) deallocating first-level STB entries before stores commit; and iii) selecting a recovery policy well-matched to data forwarding misspeculations. Moreover, the two-level STB admits two enhancements that simplify the design leaving performance almost unchanged: i) removing the data forwarding capability from the second-level STB; and ii) not checking instruction age in first-level STB prior to forwarding data to loads. Following our guidelines and running SPECint-2K over an 8-way out-of-order processor, a two-level STB (first level with four STB banks of 8 entries each) performs similarly to an ideal, single-level STB with 128-entry banks working at the first-level cache latency.