Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Charlie Rothwell

dblp:95/226 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
23ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 22 · 10 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 16 · 7 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
13 papers
3D vision · 63% Image recognition and object detection · 32% Trustworthy machine learning · 6%
Computer graphics and multimedia
10 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 84% Image and video processing · 14% Virtual and augmented reality · 2%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 27 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.151995
Class-Based Grouping in Perspective Images · ICCV 1995
Using global consistency to recognise Euclidean objects with an uncalibrated camera · CVPR 1994
Extracting projective structure from single perspective views of 3D point sets · ICCV 1993
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.041995
Class-Based Grouping in Perspective Images · ICCV 1995
A Comparison of Projective Reconstruction Methods for Pairs of Views · ICCV 1995
Eliciting qualitative structure from image curve deformations · ICCV 1993
Geometric modeling and processing › 3d scene understanding
3d object recognition
0.031995
Planar object recognition using projective shape representation · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1995
3D Object Recognition Using Invariance · Artif. Intell. 1995
Invariant Descriptors for 3D Object Recognition and Pose · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1991
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry › geometric invariants
projective invariants
0.021993
Extracting projective structure from single perspective views of 3D point sets · ICCV 1993
Efficient model library access by projectively invariant indexing functions · CVPR 1992
Computational geometry › projective geometry
projective invariants
0.021996
Semi-local projective invariants for the recognition of smooth plane curves · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1996
Extracting projective structure from single perspective views of 3D point sets · ICCV 1993
Image and video processing › occlusion handling
occlusion detection
0.011996
Reasoning about Occlusions during Hypothesis Verification · ECCV (1) 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration
0.011995
A Comparison of Projective Reconstruction Methods for Pairs of Views · ICCV 1995
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
invariance
0.011995
3D Object Recognition Using Invariance · Artif. Intell. 1995
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
projective reconstruction
0.011995
A Comparison of Projective Reconstruction Methods for Pairs of Views · ICCV 1995
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
uncalibrated stereo
0.011995
A Comparison of Projective Reconstruction Methods for Pairs of Views · ICCV 1995
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape recognition
0.011993
Efficient recognition of rotationally symmetric surfaces and straight homogeneous generalized cylinders · CVPR 1993
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
model-based object recognition
0.011992
Efficient model library access by projectively invariant indexing functions · CVPR 1992
Computer vision › 3D vision
planar object recognition
0.011992
Canonical Frames for Planar Object Recognition · ECCV 1992
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape reconstruction › shape from x
shape from contour
0.011992
Recognising rotationally symmetric surfaces from their outlines · ECCV 1992
Geometric modeling and processing › shape descriptor
invariant shape descriptor
0.011991
Invariant Descriptors for 3D Object Recognition and Pose · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1991
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis
3d shape understanding
0.011996
Understanding the Shape Properties of Trihedral Polyhedra · ECCV (1) 1996
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
hypothesis verification
0.011996
Reasoning about Occlusions during Hypothesis Verification · ECCV (1) 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
epipolar geometry
0.011995
A Comparison of Projective Reconstruction Methods for Pairs of Views · ICCV 1995
Computer vision › 3D vision
multi-view geometry
0.011995
A Comparison of Projective Reconstruction Methods for Pairs of Views · ICCV 1995
Computer vision › 3D vision
projective geometry
0.011995
Planar object recognition using projective shape representation · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1995
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling
surface modeling
0.011995
Class-Based Grouping in Perspective Images · ICCV 1995
Geometric modeling and processing › computer-aided design › computer-aided geometric design
surfaces of revolution
0.011995
Class-Based Grouping in Perspective Images · ICCV 1995
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › parametric modeling › spline curves
b-spline curves
0.011993
Eliciting qualitative structure from image curve deformations · ICCV 1993
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › parametric modeling
curve design
0.011993
Eliciting qualitative structure from image curve deformations · ICCV 1993
Computational geometry
geometric invariants
0.011993
Extracting projective structure from single perspective views of 3D point sets · ICCV 1993
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis › shape recognition
surface recognition
0.011992
Recognising rotationally symmetric surfaces from their outlines · ECCV 1992
Virtual and augmented reality
pose estimation
0.011991
Invariant Descriptors for 3D Object Recognition and Pose · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

projective geometry · 0.1projective invariants · 0.0hypothesis verification · 0.0geometric reasoning · 0.0differential geometry · 0.0projective shape representation · 0.0grouping algorithms · 0.0weak calibration · 0.0global consistency constraints · 0.0bitangent detection · 0.0b-spline snake tracking · 0.0affine invariants · 0.0canonical frames · 0.0invariant theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 A Comparison of Projective Reconstruction Methods for Pairs of Views
Charlie Rothwell, Olivier D. Faugeras, Gabriela Csurka
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.1
1996 Reasoning about Occlusions during Hypothesis Verification
Charlie Rothwell
ECCV (1)1
1996 Understanding the Shape Properties of Trihedral Polyhedra
Charlie Rothwell, Julien P. Stern
ECCV (1)1
1996 Semi-local projective invariants for the recognition of smooth plane curves
Stefan Carlsson, Roger Mohr, Theo Moons, Luce Morin, Charlie Rothwell, Marc Van Diest, Luc Van Gool, Francoise Veillon, Andrew Zisserman
Int. J. Comput. Vis.5
1995 MORSE: An Architecture for 3D Object Recognition Based on Invariants
Joseph L. Mundy, Rupert W. Curwen, Jane Liu, Charlie Rothwell, Andrew Zisserman, David A. Forsyth
ACCV4
1995 A Comparison of Projective Reconstruction Methods for Pairs of Views
abstract
Recently, different approaches for uncalibrated stereo have been suggested which permit projective reconstruction from multiple views. These use weak calibration which is represented by the epipolar geometry, and so no knowledge of the intrinsic or extrinsic camera parameters is required. We consider projective reconstructions from pairs of views, and compare a number of the available methods. Consequently we conclude which methods are most likely to be of use in applications that are dependent on 3D uncalibrated reconstructions.>
Charlie Rothwell, Gabriela Csurka, Olivier D. Faugeras
ICCV1
1995 Class-Based Grouping in Perspective Images
abstract
In any object recognition system a major and primary task is to associate those image features, within an image of a complex scene, that arise from an individual object. The key idea here is that a geometric class defined in 3D induces relationships in the image which must hold between points on the image outline (the perspective projection of the object). The resulting image constraints enable both identification and grouping of image features belonging to objects of that class. The classes include surfaces of revolution, canal surfaces (pipes) and polyhedra. Recognition proceeds by first recognising an object as belonging to one of the classes (for example a surface of revolution) and subsequently identifying the object (for example as a particular vase). This differs from conventional object recognition systems where recognition is generally targetted at particular objects. These classes also support the computation of 3D invariant descriptions including symmetry axes, canonical coordinate frames and projective signatures. The constraints and grouping methods are viewpoint invariant, and proceed with no information on object pose. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this class-based grouping on real, cluttered scenes using grouping algorithms developed for rotationally symmetric surfaces, canal-surfaces and polyhedra.>
Andrew Zisserman, Joseph L. Mundy, David A. Forsyth, Jane Liu, Nic Pillow, Charlie Rothwell, Sven Utcke
ICCV6
1995 3D Object Recognition Using Invariance
Andrew Zisserman, David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy, Charlie Rothwell, Jane Liu, Nic Pillow
Artif. Intell.4
1995 Planar object recognition using projective shape representation
Charlie Rothwell, Andrew Zisserman, David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
1994 Using global consistency to recognise Euclidean objects with an uncalibrated camera
abstract
A recognition strategy consisting of a mixture of indexing on invariants and search, allows objects to be recognised up to a Euclidean ambiguity with an uncalibrated camera. The approach works by using projective invariants to determine all the possible projectively equivalent models for a particular imaged object; then a system of global consistency constraints is used to determine which of these projectively equivalent, but Euclidean distinct, models corresponds to the objects viewed. These constraints follow from properties of the imaging geometry. In particular, a recognition hypothesis is equivalent to an assertion about, among other things, viewing conditions and geometric relationships between objects, and these assertions must be consistent for hypotheses to be correct. The approach is demonstrated to work on images of real scenes consisting of polygonal objects and polyhedra.>
David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy, Andrew Zisserman, Charlie Rothwell
CVPR4
1994 Model supported exploitation: quick look, detection and counting, and change detection
abstract
Over the last several years the concept of model-supported exploitation (MSE) has evolved to a point where relatively simple computer vision algorithms can extract significant intelligence information from aerial images in a robust and reliable manner. Information extraction is enabled by the use of detailed 3D site models which provide an extensive context for the application of image analysis algorithms. This paper reviews the basic MSE concept and illustrates the approach using three operational concepts taken from the RADIUS project, quick-look, detection and counting and focussed change detection.>
Joseph L. Mundy, Charlie Rothwell
WACV3
1993 Efficient recognition of rotationally symmetric surfaces and straight homogeneous generalized cylinders
abstract
It is known that rotationally symmetric surfaces can be recognized from their outlines alone, using cross-ratios of bitangent intersections. A successful implementation of this technique is demonstrated using a novel bitangent finder which works on images of real scenes. The stability of the cross-ratios is reported and compared to affine invariants. The recognition technique is shown to extend to the case of straight homogeneous generalized cylinders.>
Jane Liu, Joseph L. Mundy, David A. Forsyth, Andrew Zisserman, Charlie Rothwell
CVPR5
1993 Extracting projective structure from single perspective views of 3D point sets
abstract
A number of recent papers have argued that invariants do not exist for three-dimensional point sets in general position, which has often been misinterpreted to mean that invariants cannot be computed for any three-dimensional structure. It is proved by example that although the general statement is true, invariants do exist for structured three-dimensional point sets. Projective invariants are derived for two object classes: the first is for points that lie on the vertices of polyhedra, and the second for objects that are projectively equivalent to ones possessing a bilateral symmetry. The motivations for computing such invariants are twofold: they can be used for recognition, and they can be used to compute projective structure. Examples of invariants computed from real images are given.>
Charlie Rothwell, David A. Forsyth, Andrew Zisserman, Joseph L. Mundy
ICCV1
1993 Eliciting qualitative structure from image curve deformations
abstract
A family of qualitative methods is described that determines structure of curves in a scene from their image projections in two or more views. For example, plane curves are distinguished from space curves, and space curves from contour generators. The novelty of the approach is that first, it is unaffected by camera intrinsic parameters, so calibration is not required; second, it is also unaffected by camera motion, so viewer motion need not be known; and third, curves need not be matched point by point. Qualitative scene descriptions can be determined using relative measurements, and affine or projective properties alone. The practical power of this family of methods is demonstrated using a real-time vision system based on B-spline snake-tracking.>
Andrew Zisserman, Andrew Blake 0001, Charlie Rothwell, Luc Van Gool, Marc Van Diest
ICCV3
1993 Planar region detection and motion recovery
David Sinclair, Andrew Blake 0001, Stephen M. Smith 0001, Charlie Rothwell
Image Vis. Comput.4
1992 Planar Region Detection and Motion Recovery
David Sinclair, Andrew Blake 0001, Stephen M. Smith 0001, Charlie Rothwell
BMVC4
1992 Efficient model library access by projectively invariant indexing functions
abstract
Projectively invariant shape descriptors allow fast indexing into model libraries without the need for pose computation or camera calibration. Progress in building a model-based vision system for plane objects that uses algebraic projective invariants is described. A brief account of these descriptors is given, and the recognition system is described, giving examples of the invariant techniques working on real images.>
Charlie Rothwell, Andrew Zisserman, Joseph L. Mundy, David A. Forsyth
CVPR1
1992 Recognising rotationally symmetric surfaces from their outlines
David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy, Andrew Zisserman, Charlie Rothwell
ECCV4
1992 Canonical Frames for Planar Object Recognition
Charlie Rothwell, Andrew Zisserman, David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy
ECCV1
1992 Relative motion and pose from arbitrary plane curves
Charlie Rothwell, Andrew Zisserman, Constantinos Marinos, David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy
Image Vis. Comput.1
1991 Using Projective Invariants for Constant Time Library Indexing in Model Based Vision
Charlie Rothwell, Andrew Zisserman, David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy
BMVC1
1991 Invariant Descriptors for 3D Object Recognition and Pose
abstract
Invariant descriptors are shape descriptors that are unaffected by object pose, by perspective projection, or by the intrinsic parameters of the camera. These descriptors can be constructed using the methods of invariant theory, which are briefly surveyed. A range of applications of invariant descriptors in 3D model-based vision is demonstrated. First, a model-based vision system that recognizes curved plane objects irrespective of their pose is demonstrated. Curves are not reduced to polyhedral approximations but are handled as objects in their own right. Models are generated directly from image data. Once objects have been recognized, their pose can be computed. Invariant descriptors for 3D objects with plane faces are described. All these ideas are demonstrated using images of real scenes. The stability of a range of invariant descriptors to measurement error is treated in detail.>
David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy, Andrew Zisserman, Chris Coelho, Aaron Heller, Charlie Rothwell
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.6
1990 Relative motion and pose from invariants
abstract
Projectively invariant shape descriptors efficiently identify instances of object models in images without reference to object pose. These descriptions rely on frame independent representations of planar curves, using plane conies. We show that object pose can be determined from coplanar curves, given such a frame independent representation. This result is demonstrated for real image data. The shape of objects in images changes as the camera is moved around. This extremely simple observation represents the dominant problem in model based vision. Nielsen [4, 5] first suggested using projectively invariant labels as landmarks for navigation. Recent papers [1, 2] have shown that it is possible to compute shape descriptors of arbitrary plane objects that are unaffected by
Andrew Zisserman, Constantinos Marinos, David A. Forsyth, Joseph L. Mundy, Charlie Rothwell
BMVC5