Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eugene Kogan

dblp:95/369 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 94% Cloud and datacenter computing · 6%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Distributed and cloud data management · 51% Indexing and storage engines · 39% Data models and query languages · 7%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
distributed database
0.322013
Spanner: Google's Globally Distributed Database · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2013
Spanner: Google's Globally-Distributed Database · OSDI 2012
Indexing and storage engines
columnar storage
0.312017
Spanner: Becoming a SQL System · SIGMOD Conference 2017
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed query processing
0.312017
Spanner: Becoming a SQL System · SIGMOD Conference 2017
Distributed systems
consensus
0.212013
Spanner: Google's Globally Distributed Database · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2013
Distributed systems
replication
0.212013
Spanner: Google's Globally Distributed Database · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2013
Distributed systems › replication › update propagation
synchronous replication
0.212013
Spanner: Google's Globally Distributed Database · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2013
Distributed and cloud data management › data replication
replica consistency
0.112017
Spanner: Becoming a SQL System · SIGMOD Conference 2017
Data models and query languages › XML query languages
XQuery
0.112005
XQuery Implementation in a Relational Database System · VLDB 2005
Distributed systems › distributed coordination and fault tolerance
consensus and replication
0.012012
Spanner: Google's Globally-Distributed Database · OSDI 2012
Database system architecture and tuning
relational database system
0.012005
XQuery Implementation in a Relational Database System · VLDB 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

range extraction · 0.3query restart · 0.3truetime · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Spanner: Becoming a SQL System
abstract
Spanner is a globally-distributed data management system that backs hundreds of mission-critical services at Google. Spanner is built on ideas from both the systems and database communities. The first Spanner paper published at OSDI'12 focused on the systems aspects such as scalability, automatic sharding, fault tolerance, consistent replication, external consistency, and wide-area distribution. This paper highlights the database DNA of Spanner. We describe distributed query execution in the presence of resharding, query restarts upon transient failures, range extraction that drives query routing and index seeks, and the improved blockwise-columnar storage format. We touch upon migrating Spanner to the common SQL dialect shared with other systems at Google.
David F. Bacon, Nathan Bales, Nicolas Bruno, Brian F. Cooper, Adam Dickinson, Andrew Fikes, Campbell Fraser, Andrey Gubarev, Milind Joshi, Eugene Kogan, Alexander Lloyd, Sergey Melnik 0001, Rajesh Rao, David Shue, Marcel van der Holst, Dale Woodford
SIGMOD Conference10
2013 Spanner: Google's Globally Distributed Database
abstract
Spanner is Google’s scalable, multiversion, globally distributed, and synchronously replicated database. It is the first system to distribute data at global scale and support externally-consistent distributed transactions. This article describes how Spanner is structured, its feature set, the rationale underlying various design decisions, and a novel time API that exposes clock uncertainty. This API and its implementation are critical to supporting external consistency and a variety of powerful features: nonblocking reads in the past, lock-free snapshot transactions, and atomic schema changes, across all of Spanner.
James C. Corbett, Jeffrey Dean, Michael Epstein, Andrew Fikes, Christopher Frost 0001, J. J. Furman, Sanjay Ghemawat, Andrey Gubarev, Christopher Heiser, Peter Hochschild, Wilson C. Hsieh, Sebastian Kanthak, Eugene Kogan, Alexander Lloyd, Sergey Melnik 0001, David Mwaura, David Nagle, Sean Quinlan, Rajesh Rao, Lindsay Rolig, Yasushi Saito, Michal Szymaniak, Ruth Wang, Dale Woodford
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.13
2012 Spanner: Google's Globally-Distributed Database
James C. Corbett, Jeffrey Dean, Michael Epstein, Andrew Fikes, Christopher Frost 0001, J. J. Furman, Sanjay Ghemawat, Andrey Gubarev, Christopher Heiser, Peter Hochschild, Wilson C. Hsieh, Sebastian Kanthak, Eugene Kogan, Alexander Lloyd, Sergey Melnik 0001, David Mwaura, David Nagle, Sean Quinlan, Rajesh Rao, Lindsay Rolig, Yasushi Saito, Michal Szymaniak, Ruth Wang, Dale Woodford
OSDI13
2005 XQuery Implementation in a Relational Database System
Shankar Pal, Istvan Cseri, Oliver Seeliger, Michael Rys, Gideon Schaller, Dragan Tomic, Adrian Baras, Brandon Berg, Denis Churin, Eugene Kogan
VLDB11
1998 Local Area Detection of Incoming War Dial Activity
abstract
Two techniques for functional detection of local area incoming war dial are described. One technique employs a dedicated workstation looking for evidence of incoming war dial. We describe our experimental implementation of this technique, including alarm generation to a Cisco NetRanger(R) intrusion detection system. The second technique involves simple parsing of private branch exchange (PBX) call records for characteristic patterns of war dial. Baseline heuristics driving our algorithms are discussed. The non-terminated call detection limitations of this parsing technique for our Lucent Definity G3 PBX are discussed.
Edward Amoroso, Eugene Kogan, Brenda McAnderson, Dan Powell, Brian Rexroad, Steve Schuster, Anthony Stramaglia
SRDS2