Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Jutta Kreyß

dblp:95/5289 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories
defect report analysis		 0.012003
Text Mining for a Clear Picture of Defect Reports: A Praxis Report · ICDM 2003
Software maintenance and evolution › software quality management
software quality improvement		 0.012003
Text Mining for a Clear Picture of Defect Reports: A Praxis Report · ICDM 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text mining · 0.0text categorization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Text Mining for a Clear Picture of Defect Reports: A Praxis Report
abstract
We applied the text mining categorization technology, in the publicly available, IBM Enterprise Information Portal V8.1 to more than 15,000 customer reported, product problem records. We used a proven software quality category set to categorize these problem records into different areas of interest. Our intent was to develop a clear picture of potential areas for quality improvement in each of the software products reviewed, and to provide this information to development's management. We present the benefits that can be gained from categorizing problem records, as well as the limitations.
Jutta Kreyß, Steve Selvaggio, Zach Zakharian
 ICDM1
1990 The Textplanning Component PIT of the LILOG System
Jutta Kreyß, Hans-Joachim Novak
 COLING1