Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sameer Chavan
dblp:95/5696
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-0220-0845ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 70% Medical and health informatics · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
batch effect correction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014 |
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
disease subtype discovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surrogate variable analysis · 0.2statistical modeling · 0.2permutation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correctionabstractMOTIVATION: Sample source, procurement process and other technical variations introduce batch effects into genomics data. Algorithms to remove these artifacts enhance differences between known biological covariates, but also carry potential concern of removing intragroup biological heterogeneity and thus any personalized genomic signatures. As a result, accurate identification of novel subtypes from batch-corrected genomics data is challenging using standard algorithms designed to remove batch effects for class comparison analyses. Nor can batch effects be corrected reliably in future applications of genomics-based clinical tests, in which the biological groups are by definition unknown a priori. RESULTS: Therefore, we assess the extent to which various batch correction algorithms remove true biological heterogeneity. We also introduce an algorithm, permuted-SVA (pSVA), using a new statistical model that is blind to biological covariates to correct for technical artifacts while retaining biological heterogeneity in genomic data. This algorithm facilitated accurate subtype identification in head and neck cancer from gene expression data in both formalin-fixed and frozen samples. When applied to predict Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status, pSVA improved cross-study validation even if the sample batches were highly confounded with HPV status in the training set. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All analyses were performed using R version 2.15.0. The code and data used to generate the results of this manuscript is available from https://sourceforge.net/projects/psva. Hilary S. Parker, Jeffrey T. Leek, Alexander V. Favorov, Michael Considine, Xiaoxin Xia, Sameer Chavan, Christine H. Chung, Elana J. Fertig |
Bioinform. | 6 |