Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeni Tennison

dblp:95/6650 · also Jenifer Fay Alys Tennison · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Usability and user experience research · 98% User interface design and tools · 2%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › search engines
dataset search
0.112020
Everything you always wanted to know about a dataset: Studies in data summarisation · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology construction
0.012002
APECKS: using and evaluating a tool for ontology construction with internal and external KA support · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 0.9diary study · 0.9crowdsourcing · 0.9search log analysis · 0.3interview study · 0.3ontology evaluation · 0.1knowledge acquisition · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Everything you always wanted to know about a dataset: Studies in data summarisation
abstract
Summarising data as text helps people make sense of it. It also improves data discovery, as search algorithms can match this text against keyword queries. In this paper, we explore the characteristics of text summaries of data in order to understand how meaningful summaries look like. We present two complementary studies: a data-search diary study with 69 students, which offers insight into the information needs of people searching for data; and a summarisation study, with a lab and a crowdsourcing component with overall 80 data-literate participants, who produced summaries for 25 datasets. In each study we carried out a qualitative analysis to identify key themes and commonly mentioned dataset attributes, which people consider when searching and making sense of data. The results helped us design a template to create more meaningful textual representations of data, alongside guidelines for improving data-search experience overall.
Laura Koesten, Elena Simperl, Tom Blount, Emilia Kacprzak, Jeni Tennison
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.5
2019 Collaborative Practices with Structured Data: Do Tools Support What Users Need?
abstract
Collaborative work with data is increasingly common and spans a broad range of activities - from creating or analysing data in a team, to sharing it with others, to reusing someone else's data in a new context. In this paper, we explore collaboration practices around structured data and how they are supported by current technology. We present the results of an interview study with twenty data practitioners, from which we derive four high-level user needs for tool support. We compare them against the capabilities of twenty systems that are commonly associated with data activities, including data publishing software, wikis, web-based collaboration tools, and online community platforms. Our findings suggest that data-centric collaborative work would benefit from: structured documentation of data and its lifecycle; advanced affordances for conversations among collaborators; better change control; and custom data access. The findings help us formalise practices around data teamwork, and build a better understanding how people's motivations and barriers when working with structured data.
Laura Koesten, Emilia Kacprzak, Jeni Tennison, Elena Simperl
CHI3
2019 Characterising dataset search - An analysis of search logs and data requests
Emilia Kacprzak, Laura Koesten, Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, Tom Blount, Jeni Tennison, Elena Simperl
J. Web Semant.5
2018 Making Sense of Numerical Data - Semantic Labelling of Web Tables
Emilia Kacprzak, José M. Giménez-García, Alessandro Piscopo, Laura Koesten, Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, Jeni Tennison, Elena Simperl
EKAW6
2017 The Trials and Tribulations of Working with Structured Data: -a Study on Information Seeking Behaviour
abstract
Structured data such as databases, spreadsheets and web tables is becoming critical in every domain and professional role. Yet we still do not know much about how people interact with it. Our research focuses on the information seeking behaviour of people looking for new sources of structured data online, including the task context in which the data will be used, data search, and the identification of relevant datasets from a set of possible candidates. We present a mixed-methods study covering in-depth interviews with 20 participants with various professional backgrounds, supported by the analysis of search logs of a large data portal. Based on this study, we propose a framework for human structured-data interaction and discuss challenges people encounter when trying to find and assess data that helps their daily work. We provide design recommendations for data publishers and developers of online data platforms such as data catalogs and marketplaces. These recommendations highlight important questions for HCI research to improve how people engage and make use of this incredibly useful online resource.
Laura Koesten, Emilia Kacprzak, Jeni Tennison, Elena Simperl
CHI3
2017 A Query Log Analysis of Dataset Search
Emilia Kacprzak, Laura Koesten, Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, Elena Simperl, Jeni Tennison
ICWE5
2006 XSLT working session
abstract
Document engineering has been transformed by the development and adoption of XML as a common form (a 'meta-language') for defining document representations of many types. Recently XSLT has matured significantly as a transformational technology for XML-based documents that could have similar effect in the design of document processing tools. XSLT brings technologies from functional programming to bear on producing robust programs firmly embedded in the context of XML. We have new ideas and emphases on solution design, from very localised techniques, tricks and algorithms right up to large-scale program suites. XSLT's functional programming basis, its ability to mix push- and pull-driven effects, lack of reassignable state and definition within XML, all present challenges and opportunities to those both learning and exploiting its powers.Many of the attendees at DocEng'06 will have some experience of using XSLT in their research and practice. In this working session we aim to share interesting and useful insights and exploitations of XSLT, through an extended panel session and 'audience participation'. The session leaders (John Lumley, Jeni Tennison) have extensive experience of using XSLT within document engineering. The session starts with subjects suggested by the presenters and continues with a variety of topics raised by attendees.
John William Lumley, Jeni Tennison
ACM Symposium on Document Engineering2
2006 Processing XML documents with pipelines
abstract
We live in a world where documents do not simply exist in the form we need them. Getting from stored form to final presentation is often a complex process. Documents have to be generated, validated and transformed, queried, split, merged, filtered, annotated, restructured, translated and rendered. We need it to be easy to define the set of processes that the document has to go through. And we need it to be fast, at run time, to do this processing.The XML Processing Model Working Group is developing a markup language for defining pipelines of processes that XML documents may go through. In this talk I shall describe how pipelines can be put together using the XProc language and why even simple processing can benefit from being organised in that way.
Jeni Tennison
ACM Symposium on Document Engineering1
2002 APECKS: using and evaluating a tool for ontology construction with internal and external KA support
Jeni Tennison, Kieron O'Hara, Nigel Shadbolt
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2000 Certifying KBSs: Using CommonKADS to Provide Supporting Evidence for Fitness for Purpose of KBSs
Kieron O'Hara, Nigel Shadbolt, Jeni Tennison
EKAW3