Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard McKinley
dblp:95/6709
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8250-6117ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 77% Segmentation and scene understanding · 23% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Physically Consistent Image Augmentation for Deep Learning in Mueller Matrix Polarimetry · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Computational photography and imaging
polarization imaging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Physically Consistent Image Augmentation for Deep Learning in Mueller Matrix Polarimetry · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Physically Consistent Image Augmentation for Deep Learning in Mueller Matrix Polarimetry · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
physically consistent augmentation · 1.7mueller matrix simulation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Physically Consistent Image Augmentation for Deep Learning in Mueller Matrix PolarimetryabstractMueller matrix polarimetry captures essential information about polarized light interactions with a sample, presenting unique challenges for data augmentation in deep learning due to its distinct structure. While augmentations are an effective and affordable way to enhance dataset diversity and reduce overfitting, standard transformations like rotations and flips do not preserve the polarization properties in Mueller matrix images. To this end, we introduce a versatile simulation framework that applies physically consistent rotations and flips to Mueller matrices, tailored to maintain polarization fidelity. Our experimental results across multiple datasets reveal that conventional augmentations can lead to falsified results when applied to polarimetric data, underscoring the necessity of our physics-based approach. In our experiments, we first compare our polarization-specific augmentations against real-world captures to validate their physical consistency. We then apply these augmentations in a semantic segmentation task, achieving substantial improvements in model generalization and performance. This study underscores the necessity of physics-informed data augmentation for polarimetric imaging in deep learning (DL), paving the way for broader adoption and more robust applications across diverse research in the field. In particular, our framework unlocks the potential of DL models for polarimetric datasets with limited sample sizes. Our code implementation is available at github.com/hahnec/polar_augment. Christopher Hahne, Omar Rodríguez-Núñez, Éléa Gros, Théotim Lucas, Ekkehard Hewer, Tatiana Novikova, Theoni Maragkou, Philippe Schucht, Richard McKinley |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 9 |
| 2024 | Characterization of Polarimetric Properties in Various Brain Tumor Types Using Wide-Field Imaging Mueller PolarimetryabstractNeuro-oncological surgery is the primary brain cancer treatment, yet it faces challenges with gliomas due to their invasiveness and the need to preserve neurological function. Hence, radical resection is often unfeasible, highlighting the importance of precise tumor margin delineation to prevent neurological deficits and improve prognosis. Imaging Mueller polarimetry, an effective modality in various organ tissues, seems a promising approach for tumor delineation in neurosurgery. To further assess its use, we characterized the polarimetric properties by analysing 45 polarimetric measurements of 27 fresh brain tumor samples, including different tumor types with a strong focus on gliomas. Our study integrates a wide-field imaging Mueller polarimetric system and a novel neuropathology protocol, correlating polarimetric and histological data for accurate tissue identification. An image processing pipeline facilitated the alignment and overlay of polarimetric images and histological masks. Variations in depolarization values were observed for grey and white matter of brain tumor tissue, while differences in linear retardance were seen only within white matter of brain tumor tissue. Notably, we identified pronounced optical axis azimuth randomization within tumor regions. This study lays the foundation for machine learning-based brain tumor segmentation algorithms using polarimetric data, facilitating intraoperative diagnosis and decision making. Éléa Gros, Omar Rodríguez-Núñez, Leonard A. Felger, Stefano Moriconi, Richard McKinley, Angelo Pierangelo, Tatiana Novikova, Erik Vassella, Philippe Schucht, Ekkehard Hewer, Theoni Maragkou |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 5 |
| 2023 | CortexMorph: Fast Cortical Thickness Estimation via Diffeomorphic Registration Using VoxelMorph
Richard McKinley, Christian Rummel |
MICCAI (10) | 1 |
| 2019 | Standardized Assessment of Automatic Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities and Results of the WMH Segmentation ChallengeabstractQuantification of cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin is of key importance in many neurological research studies. Currently, measurements are often still obtained from manual segmentations on brain MR images, which is a laborious procedure. The automatic WMH segmentation methods exist, but a standardized comparison of the performance of such methods is lacking. We organized a scientific challenge, in which developers could evaluate their methods on a standardized multi-center/-scanner image dataset, giving an objective comparison: the WMH Segmentation Challenge. Sixty T1 + FLAIR images from three MR scanners were released with the manual WMH segmentations for training. A test set of 110 images from five MR scanners was used for evaluation. The segmentation methods had to be containerized and submitted to the challenge organizers. Five evaluation metrics were used to rank the methods: 1) Dice similarity coefficient; 2) modified Hausdorff distance (95th percentile); 3) absolute log-transformed volume difference; 4) sensitivity for detecting individual lesions; and 5) F1-score for individual lesions. In addition, the methods were ranked on their inter-scanner robustness; 20 participants submitted their methods for evaluation. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the results. In brief, there is a cluster of four methods that rank significantly better than the other methods, with one clear winner. The inter-scanner robustness ranking shows that not all the methods generalize to unseen scanners. The challenge remains open for future submissions and provides a public platform for method evaluation. Hugo J. Kuijf, Adrià Casamitjana, D. Louis Collins, Mahsa Dadar, Achilleas Georgiou, Mohsen Ghafoorian, Dakai Jin, April Khademi, Jesse Knight, Hongwei Li 0004, Xavier Lladó, J. Matthijs Biesbroek, Miguel Luna, Qaiser Mahmood, Richard McKinley, Alireza Mehrtash, Sébastien Ourselin, Bo-yong Park, Hyunjin Park, Simon Pezold, Élodie Puybareau, Jeroen de Bresser, Letícia Rittner, Carole H. Sudre, Sergi Valverde, Verónica Vilaplana, Roland Wiest, Yongchao Xu, Ziyue Xu 0004, Guodong Zeng, Jianguo Zhang 0001, Guoyan Zheng, Rutger Heinen, Christopher Li Hsian Chen, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Frederik Barkhof, Max A. Viergever, Geert Jan Biessels, Simon Andermatt, Mariana P. Bento, Matt Berseth, Mikhail Belyaev, Manuel Jorge Cardoso |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 15 |
| 2018 | Enhancing interpretability of automatically extracted machine learning features: application to a RBM-Random Forest system on brain lesion segmentation
Sérgio Pereira, Raphael Meier, Richard McKinley, Roland Wiest, Victor Alves, Carlos A. Silva 0002, Mauricio Reyes 0001 |
Medical Image Anal. | 3 |
| 2013 | Canonical proof nets for classical logic
Richard McKinley |
Ann. Pure Appl. Log. | 1 |
| 2013 | Proof Nets for Herbrand's TheoremabstractThis article explores Herbrand’s theorem as the source of a natural notion of abstract proof object for classical logic, embodying the “essence” of a sequent calculus proof. We see how to view a calculus of abstract Herbrand proofs (Herbrand nets) as an analytic proof system with syntactic cut-elimination. Herbrand nets can also be seen as a natural generalization of Miller’s expansion tree proofs to a setting including cut. We demonstrate sequentialization of Herbrand nets into a sequent calculus LK H ; each net corresponds to an equivalence class of LK H proofs under natural proof transformations. A surprising property of our cut-reduction algorithm is that it is non-confluent despite not supporting the usual examples of non-confluent reduction in classical logic. Richard McKinley |
ACM Trans. Comput. Log. | 1 |
| 2008 | An Algorithmic Interpretation of a Deep Inference System
Kai Brünnler, Richard McKinley |
LPAR | 2 |