Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keshi Dai

dblp:95/6788 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0009-0004-1016-3660ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
score distribution modeling
0.112010
Score distribution models: assumptions, intuition, and robustness to score manipulation · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › retrieval models › probabilistic retrieval model
BM25
0.012010
Score distribution models: assumptions, intuition, and robustness to score manipulation · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › retrieval models
language model
0.012010
Score distribution models: assumptions, intuition, and robustness to score manipulation · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › ranking
ranking functions
0.012010
Score distribution models: assumptions, intuition, and robustness to score manipulation · SIGIR 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic modeling · 0.1gaussian distribution · 0.1gamma distribution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Extended Expectation Maximization for Inferring Score Distributions
Keshi Dai, Virgil Pavlu, Evangelos Kanoulas, Javed A. Aslam
ECIR1
2011 Variational bayes for modeling score distributions
Keshi Dai, Evangelos Kanoulas, Virgil Pavlu, Javed A. Aslam
Inf. Retr.1
2010 Score distribution models: assumptions, intuition, and robustness to score manipulation
abstract
Inferring the score distribution of relevant and non-relevant documents is an essential task for many IR applications (e.g. information filtering, recall-oriented IR, meta-search, distributed IR). Modeling score distributions in an accurate manner is the basis of any inference. Thus, numerous score distribution models have been proposed in the literature. Most of the models were proposed on the basis of empirical evidence and goodness-of-fit. In this work, we model score distributions in a rather different, systematic manner. We start with a basic assumption on the distribution of terms in a document. Following the transformations applied on term frequencies by two basic ranking functions, BM25 and Language Models, we derive the distribution of the produced scores for all documents. Then we focus on the relevant documents. We detach our analysis from particular ranking functions. Instead, we consider a model for precision-recall curves, and given this model, we present a general mathematical framework which, given any score distribution for all retrieved documents, produces an analytical formula for the score distribution of relevant documents that is consistent with the precision-recall curves that follow the aforementioned model. In particular, assuming a Gamma distribution for all retrieved documents, we show that the derived distribution for the relevant documents resembles a Gaussian distribution with a heavy right tail.
Evangelos Kanoulas, Keshi Dai, Virgil Pavlu, Javed A. Aslam
SIGIR2