Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shashi Singh
dblp:95/7258
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Indexing and storage engines · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Indexing and storage engines
write-optimized index |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory
flash storage |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 |
Storage systems › indexing
tree index |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory
NAND flash |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD
solid-state drive |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online buffer sizing · 0.2lazy update · 0.2cascaded buffering · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash DevicesabstractFlash memories are in ubiquitous use for storage on sensor nodes, mobile devices, and enterprise servers. However, they present significant challenges in designing tree indexes due to their fundamentally different read and write characteristics in comparison to magnetic disks. In this paper, we present the Lazy-Adaptive Tree (LA-Tree), a novel index structure that is designed to improve performance by minimizing accesses to flash. The LA-tree has three key features: 1) it amortizes the cost of node reads and writes by performing update operations in a lazy manner using cascaded buffers, 2) it dynamically adapts buffer sizes to workload using an online algorithm, which we prove to be optimal under the cost model for raw NAND flashes, and 3) it optimizes index parameters, memory management, and storage reclamation to address flash constraints. Our performance results on raw NAND flashes show that the LA-Tree achieves 2x to 12x gains over the best of alternate schemes across a range of workloads and memory constraints. Initial results on SSDs are also promising, with 3x to 6x gains in most cases. Devesh Agrawal, Deepak Ganesan, Ramesh K. Sitaraman, Yanlei Diao, Shashi Singh |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 5 |