Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shashi Singh

dblp:95/7258 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Indexing and storage engines · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines
write-optimized index
0.112009
Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory
flash storage
0.112009
Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Storage systems › indexing
tree index
0.112009
Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory
NAND flash
0.012009
Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Storage systems › flash and SSD
solid-state drive
0.012009
Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online buffer sizing · 0.2lazy update · 0.2cascaded buffering · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices
abstract
Flash memories are in ubiquitous use for storage on sensor nodes, mobile devices, and enterprise servers. However, they present significant challenges in designing tree indexes due to their fundamentally different read and write characteristics in comparison to magnetic disks. In this paper, we present the Lazy-Adaptive Tree (LA-Tree), a novel index structure that is designed to improve performance by minimizing accesses to flash. The LA-tree has three key features: 1) it amortizes the cost of node reads and writes by performing update operations in a lazy manner using cascaded buffers, 2) it dynamically adapts buffer sizes to workload using an online algorithm, which we prove to be optimal under the cost model for raw NAND flashes, and 3) it optimizes index parameters, memory management, and storage reclamation to address flash constraints. Our performance results on raw NAND flashes show that the LA-Tree achieves 2x to 12x gains over the best of alternate schemes across a range of workloads and memory constraints. Initial results on SSDs are also promising, with 3x to 6x gains in most cases.
Devesh Agrawal, Deepak Ganesan, Ramesh K. Sitaraman, Yanlei Diao, Shashi Singh
Proc. VLDB Endow.5