Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Euan Robertson
dblp:95/7981
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 56% Accessibility and assistive technology · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology for visual impairment
non-visual access |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs · CHI 2010 |
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces
tangible user interface |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs · CHI 2010 |
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces
tangible interaction |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs · CHI 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.1evaluation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphsabstractWe present a tangible user interface (TUI) called Tangible Graph Builder, that has been designed to allow visually impaired users to access graph and chart-based data. We describe the current paper-based materials used to allow independent graph construction and browsing, before discussing how researchers have applied virtual haptic and non-speech audio techniques to provide more flexible access. We discuss why, although these technologies overcome many of the problems of non-visual graph access, they also introduce new issues and why the application of TUIs is important. An evaluation of Tangible Graph Builder with 12 participants (8 sight deprived, 4 blind) revealed key design requirements for non-visual TUIs, including phicon design and handling marker detection failure. We finish by presenting future work and improvements to our system. David K. McGookin, Euan Robertson, Stephen A. Brewster |
CHI | 2 |