Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Euan Robertson

dblp:95/7981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 56% Accessibility and assistive technology · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology for visual impairment
non-visual access
0.112010
Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs · CHI 2010
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces
tangible user interface
0.112010
Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs · CHI 2010
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces
tangible interaction
0.012010
Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs · CHI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.1evaluation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs
abstract
We present a tangible user interface (TUI) called Tangible Graph Builder, that has been designed to allow visually impaired users to access graph and chart-based data. We describe the current paper-based materials used to allow independent graph construction and browsing, before discussing how researchers have applied virtual haptic and non-speech audio techniques to provide more flexible access. We discuss why, although these technologies overcome many of the problems of non-visual graph access, they also introduce new issues and why the application of TUIs is important. An evaluation of Tangible Graph Builder with 12 participants (8 sight deprived, 4 blind) revealed key design requirements for non-visual TUIs, including phicon design and handling marker detection failure. We finish by presenting future work and improvements to our system.
David K. McGookin, Euan Robertson, Stephen A. Brewster
CHI2