EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexandra Roatis
dblp:95/8398
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 26% Query processing and optimization · 21% Distributed and cloud data management · 20% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed and cloud data management
data lake |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | CLAMS: Bringing Quality to Data Lakes · SIGMOD Conference 2016 |
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
data quality assessment |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | CLAMS: Bringing Quality to Data Lakes · SIGMOD Conference 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Reasoning on web data: Algorithms and performance · ICDE 2015 |
Query processing and optimization
analytical query |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | RDF analytics: lenses over semantic graphs · WWW 2014 |
Graph data management › RDF data management
RDF data analytics |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | RDF analytics: lenses over semantic graphs · WWW 2014 |
Query processing and optimization
query execution |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Reasoning on web data: Algorithms and performance · ICDE 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ontological schema reasoning · 0.4data profiling · 0.2analytical schemas · 0.2aggregation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Privacy Preserving Data Mining as Proof of Useful Work: Exploring an AI/Blockchain DesignabstractBlockchains rely on a consensus among participants to achieve decentralization and security. However, reaching consensus in an online, digital world where identities are not tied to physical users is a challenging problem. Proof-of-work provides a solution by linking representation to a valuable, physical resource. While this has worked well, it uses a tremendous amount of specialized hardware and energy, with no utility beyond blockchain security. Here, the authors propose an alternative consensus scheme that directs the computational resources to the optimization of machine learning (ML) models – a task with more general utility. This is achieved by a hybrid consensus scheme relying on three parties: data providers, miners, and a committee. The data provider makes data available and provides payment in return for the best model, miners compete about the payment and access to the committee by producing ML optimized models, and the committee controls the ML competition. Hjalmar K. Turesson, Henry M. Kim, Marek Laskowski, Alexandra Roatis |
J. Database Manag. | 4 |
| 2016 | CLAMS: Bringing Quality to Data LakesabstractWith the increasing incentive of enterprises to ingest as much data as they can in what is commonly referred to as "data lakes", and with the recent development of multiple technologies to support this "load-first" paradigm, the new environment presents serious data management challenges. Among them, the assessment of data quality and cleaning large volumes of heterogeneous data sources become essential tasks in unveiling the value of big data. The coveted use of unstructured and semi-structured data in large volumes makes current data cleaning tools (primarily designed for relational data) not directly adoptable. Mina H. Farid, Alexandra Roatis, Ihab F. Ilyas, Hella-Franziska Hoffmann |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2015 | Reasoning on web data: Algorithms and performanceabstractTechniques for efficiently managing Semantic Web data have attracted significant interest from the data management and knowledge representation communities. A great deal of effort has been invested, especially in the database community, into algorithms and tools for efficient RDF query evaluation. However, the main interest of RDF lies in its blending of heterogeneous data and semantics. Simple RDF graphs can be seen as collections of facts, which may be further enriched with ontological schemas, or semantic constraints, based on which reasoning can be applied to infer new information. Taking into account this implicit information is crucial for answering queries. Damian Bursztyn, François Goasdoué, Ioana Manolescu, Alexandra Roatis |
ICDE | 4 |
| 2014 | RDF analytics: lenses over semantic graphsabstractThe development of Semantic Web (RDF) brings new requirements for data analytics tools and methods, going beyond querying to semantics-rich analytics through warehouse-style tools. In this work, we fully redesign, from the bottom up, core data analytics concepts and tools in the context of RDF data, leading to the first complete formal framework for warehouse-style RDF analytics. Notably, we define i) analytical schemas tailored to heterogeneous, semantics-rich RDF graph, ii) analytical queries which (beyond relational cubes) allow flexible querying of the data and the schema as well as powerful aggregation and iii) OLAP-style operations. Experiments on a fully-implemented platform demonstrate the practical interest of our approach. Dario Colazzo, François Goasdoué, Ioana Manolescu, Alexandra Roatis |
WWW | 4 |
| 2013 | Efficient query answering against dynamic RDF databasesabstractA promising method for efficiently querying RDF data consists of translating SPARQL queries into efficient RDBMS-style operations. However, answering SPARQL queries requires handling RDF reasoning, which must be implemented outside the relational engines that do not support it. François Goasdoué, Ioana Manolescu, Alexandra Roatis |
EDBT | 3 |
| 2010 | LiquidXML: adaptive XML content redistributionabstractWe propose to demonstrate LiquidXML, a platform for managing large corpora of XML documents in large-scale P2P networks. All LiquidXML peers may publish XML documents to be shared with all the network peers. The challenge then is to efficiently (re-)distribute the published content in the network, possibly in overlapping, redundant fragments, to support efficient processing of queries at each peer. The novelty of LiquidXML relies in its adaptive method of choosing which data fragments are stored where, to improve performance. The "liquid" aspect of XML management is twofold: XML data flows from many sources towards many consumers, and its distribution in the network continuously adapts to improve query performance. Jesús Camacho-Rodríguez, Asterios Katsifodimos, Ioana Manolescu, Alexandra Roatis |
CIKM | 4 |