Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Will Y. Zou

dblp:95/9989 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 63% Video understanding and tracking · 20% Machine translation · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.312018
RapidScorer: Fast Tree Ensemble Evaluation by Maximizing Compactness in Data Level Parallelization · KDD 2018
Information retrieval
ranking
0.312018
RapidScorer: Fast Tree Ensemble Evaluation by Maximizing Compactness in Data Level Parallelization · KDD 2018
Information retrieval
search engines
0.312018
RapidScorer: Fast Tree Ensemble Evaluation by Maximizing Compactness in Data Level Parallelization · KDD 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
bilingual word embedding
0.212013
Bilingual Word Embeddings for Phrase-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
phrase-based translation
0.212013
Bilingual Word Embeddings for Phrase-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
0.212013
Bilingual Word Embeddings for Phrase-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning
0.112012
Deep Learning of Invariant Features via Simulated Fixations in Video · NIPS 2012
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.112011
Learning hierarchical invariant spatio-temporal features for action recognition with independent subspace analysis · CVPR 2011
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation › independent component analysis
independent subspace analysis
0.112011
Learning hierarchical invariant spatio-temporal features for action recognition with independent subspace analysis · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › spatio-temporal modeling
spatiotemporal feature learning
0.112011
Learning hierarchical invariant spatio-temporal features for action recognition with independent subspace analysis · CVPR 2011
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning
0.112011
Learning hierarchical invariant spatio-temporal features for action recognition with independent subspace analysis · CVPR 2011
Parallel and multicore computing › data-parallel programming
data-level parallelization
0.112018
RapidScorer: Fast Tree Ensemble Evaluation by Maximizing Compactness in Data Level Parallelization · KDD 2018
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.012012
Deep Learning of Invariant Features via Simulated Fixations in Video · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation
0.012012
Deep Learning of Invariant Features via Simulated Fixations in Video · NIPS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

run-length encoding · 0.7data parallelization · 0.7bitvector representation · 0.7word alignment · 0.2neural language model · 0.2smooth pursuit simulation · 0.1salient feature detection · 0.1hierarchical network · 0.1stacking · 0.1independent subspace analysis · 0.1convolution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 RapidScorer: Fast Tree Ensemble Evaluation by Maximizing Compactness in Data Level Parallelization
abstract
Relevance ranking models based on additive ensembles of regression trees have shown quite good effectiveness in web search engines. In the era of big data, tree ensemble models grow large in both tree depth and ensemble size to provide even better search relevance and user experience. However, the computational cost for their scoring process is high, such that it becomes a challenging issue to apply the big tree ensemble models in a search engine which needs to answer thousands of queries per second. Although several works have been proposed to improve the scoring process, the challenge is still great especially when the model size grows large. In this paper, we present RapidScorer , a novel framework for speeding up the scoring process of industry-scale tree ensemble models, without hurting the quality of scoring results. RapidScorer introduces a modified run length encoding called epitome to the bitvector representation of the tree nodes. Epitome can greatly reduce the computation cost to traverse the tree ensemble, and work with several other proposed strategies to maximize the compactness of data units in memory. The achieved compactness makes it possible to fully utilize data parallelization to improve model scalability. Experiments on two web search benchmarks show that, RapidScorer achieves significant speed-up over the state-of-the-art methods: V-QuickScorer , ranging from 1.3x to 3.5x; QuickScorer , ranging from 2.1x to 25.0x; VPred , ranging from 2.3x to 18.3x; and XGBoost , ranging from 2.6x to 42.5x.
Ting Ye, Hucheng Zhou, Will Y. Zou, Bin Gao 0001, Ruofei Zhang
KDD3
2014 Generic Object Detection with Dense Neural Patterns and Regionlets
Will Y. Zou, Yuanqing Lin
BMVC1
2013 Progressive Development of the Number Sense in a Deep Neural Network
Will Y. Zou, James L. McClelland
CogSci1
2013 Bilingual Word Embeddings for Phrase-Based Machine Translation
abstract
We introduce bilingual word embeddings: semantic embeddings associated across two languages in the context of neural language models.We propose a method to learn bilingual embeddings from a large unlabeled corpus, while utilizing MT word alignments to constrain translational equivalence.The new embeddings significantly out-perform baselines in word semantic similarity.A single semantic similarity feature induced with bilingual embeddings adds near half a BLEU point to the results of NIST08 Chinese-English machine translation task.
Will Y. Zou, Richard Socher, Daniel M. Cer, Christopher D. Manning
EMNLP1
2012 Deep Learning of Invariant Features via Simulated Fixations in Video
abstract
We apply salient feature detection and tracking in videos to simulate fixations and smooth pursuit in human vision. With tracked sequences as input, a hierarchical network of modules learns invariant features using a temporal slowness constraint. The network encodes invariance which are increasingly complex with hierarchy. Although learned from videos, our features are spatial instead of spatial-temporal, and well suited for extracting features from still images. We applied our features to four datasets (COIL-100, Caltech 101, STL-10, PubFig), and observe a consistent improvement of 4% to 5% in classification accuracy. With this approach, we achieve state-of-the-art recognition accuracy 61% on STL-10 dataset.
Will Y. Zou, Andrew Y. Ng, Shenghuo Zhu, Kai Yu 0001
NIPS1
2011 Learning hierarchical invariant spatio-temporal features for action recognition with independent subspace analysis
abstract
Previous work on action recognition has focused on adapting hand-designed local features, such as SIFT or HOG, from static images to the video domain. In this paper, we propose using unsupervised feature learning as a way to learn features directly from video data. More specifically, we present an extension of the Independent Subspace Analysis algorithm to learn invariant spatio-temporal features from unlabeled video data. We discovered that, despite its simplicity, this method performs surprisingly well when combined with deep learning techniques such as stacking and convolution to learn hierarchical representations. By replacing hand-designed features with our learned features, we achieve classification results superior to all previous published results on the Hollywood2, UCF, KTH and YouTube action recognition datasets. On the challenging Hollywood2 and YouTube action datasets we obtain 53.3% and 75.8% respectively, which are approximately 5% better than the current best published results. Further benefits of this method, such as the ease of training and the efficiency of training and prediction, will also be discussed. You can download our code and learned spatio-temporal features here: http://ai.stanford.edu/~wzou/.
Quoc V. Le, Will Y. Zou, Serena Yeung-Levy, Andrew Y. Ng
CVPR2