Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sam Griffiths-Jones

dblp:96/1139 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6043-807XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 81% Computational science and engineering · 19%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
bias correction
0.212015
Bias in microRNA functional enrichment analysis · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
functional enrichment analysis
0.212015
Bias in microRNA functional enrichment analysis · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › small RNA-seq analysis
microRNA identification
0.112012
Detection of microRNAs in color space · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › read mapping
short read alignment
0.112012
Detection of microRNAs in color space · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › RNA sequence analysis
small RNA analysis
0.112012
Detection of microRNAs in color space · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment
alignment editing
0.112005
RALEE--RNA ALignment Editor in Emacs · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence alignment
RNA sequence alignment
0.112005
RALEE--RNA ALignment Editor in Emacs · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA structure analysis
0.112005
RALEE--RNA ALignment Editor in Emacs · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
profile hidden markov model
0.012002
The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein homology detection
0.012002
The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA secondary structure prediction
0.012005
RALEE--RNA ALignment Editor in Emacs · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multiple sequence alignment
0.012002
The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis
0.012002
The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis
structural alignment
0.012002
The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs · Bioinform. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypergeometric test · 0.2empirical sampling · 0.2sequential trimming · 0.1color-space mapping · 0.1structure-specific colour scheme · 0.1helper applications for structure prediction · 0.1structural superposition · 0.0profile hidden markov model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 miRScore: A rapid and precise microRNA validation tool
abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-protein-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression in many eukaryotes. Next-generation sequencing of small RNAs (small RNA-seq) is central to the discovery and annotation of miRNAs. Newly annotated miRNAs and their longer precursors encoded by MIRNA loci are typically submitted to databases such as the miRBase microRNA registry following the publication of a peer-reviewed study. However, genome-wide scans using small RNA-seq data often yield high rates of false-positive MIRNA annotations, highlighting the need for more robust validation methods. miRScore was developed as an independent and efficient tool for evaluating new MIRNA annotations using sRNA-seq data. miRScore combines structural and expression-based analyses to provide rapid and reliable validation of new MIRNA annotations. By providing users with detailed metrics and visualization, miRScore enhances the ability to assess confidence in MIRNA annotations. miRScore has the potential to advance the overall quality of MIRNA annotations by improving accuracy of new submissions to miRNA databases and serving as a resource for re-evaluating existing annotations.
Allison Vanek, Sam Griffiths-Jones, Blake C. Meyers, Saima Shahid, Michael J. Axtell
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2015 Bias in microRNA functional enrichment analysis
abstract
Abstract Motivation: Many studies have investigated the differential expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) in disease states and between different treatments, tissues and developmental stages. Given a list of perturbed miRNAs, it is common to predict the shared pathways on which they act. The standard test for functional enrichment typically yields dozens of significantly enriched functional categories, many of which appear frequently in the analysis of apparently unrelated diseases and conditions. Results: We show that the most commonly used functional enrichment test is inappropriate for the analysis of sets of genes targeted by miRNAs. The hypergeometric distribution used by the standard method consistently results in significant P-values for functional enrichment for targets of randomly selected miRNAs, reflecting an underlying bias in the predicted gene targets of miRNAs as a whole. We developed an algorithm to measure enrichment using an empirical sampling approach, and applied this in a reanalysis of the gene ontology classes of targets of miRNA lists from 44 published studies. The vast majority of the miRNA target sets were not significantly enriched in any functional category after correction for bias. We therefore argue against continued use of the standard functional enrichment method for miRNA targets. Availability and implementation: A Python script implementing the empirical algorithm is freely available at http://sgjlab.org/empirical-go/. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Thomas Bleazard, Janine A. Lamb, Sam Griffiths-Jones
Bioinform.3
2012 Detection of microRNAs in color space
abstract
MOTIVATION: Deep sequencing provides inexpensive opportunities to characterize the transcriptional diversity of known genomes. The AB SOLiD technology generates millions of short sequencing reads in color-space; that is, the raw data is a sequence of colors, where each color represents 2 nt and each nucleotide is represented by two consecutive colors. This strategy is purported to have several advantages, including increased ability to distinguish sequencing errors from polymorphisms. Several programs have been developed to map short reads to genomes in color space. However, a number of previously unexplored technical issues arise when using SOLiD technology to characterize microRNAs. RESULTS: Here we explore these technical difficulties. First, since the sequenced reads are longer than the biological sequences, every read is expected to contain linker fragments. The color-calling error rate increases toward the 3(') end of the read such that recognizing the linker sequence for removal becomes problematic. Second, mapping in color space may lead to the loss of the first nucleotide of each read. We propose a sequential trimming and mapping approach to map small RNAs. Using our strategy, we reanalyze three published insect small RNA deep sequencing datasets and characterize 22 new microRNAs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A bash shell script to perform the sequential trimming and mapping procedure, called SeqTrimMap, is available at: http://www.mirbase.org/tools/seqtrimmap/ CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Antonio Marco, Sam Griffiths-Jones
Bioinform.2
2005 RALEE--RNA ALignment Editor in Emacs
abstract
UNLABELLED: Production of high quality multiple sequence alignments of structured RNAs relies on an iterative combination of manual editing and structure prediction. An essential feature of an RNA alignment editor is the facility to mark-up the alignment based on how it matches a given secondary structure prediction, but few available alignment editors offer such a feature. The RALEE (RNA ALignment Editor in Emacs) tool provides a simple environment for RNA multiple sequence alignment editing, including structure-specific colour schemes, utilizing helper applications for structure prediction and many more conventional editing functions. This is accomplished by extending the commonly used text editor, Emacs, which is available for Linux, most UNIX systems, Windows and Mac OS. AVAILABILITY: The ELISP source code for RALEE is freely available from http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Users/sgj/ralee/ along with documentation and examples. CONTACT: [email protected]
Sam Griffiths-Jones
Bioinform.1
2002 InterPro: An Integrated Documentation Resource for Protein Families, Domains and Functional Sites
abstract
The exponential increase in the submission of nucleotide sequences to the nucleotide sequence database by genome sequencing centres has resulted in a need for rapid, automatic methods for classification of the resulting protein sequences. There are several signature and sequence cluster-based methods for protein classification, each resource having distinct areas of optimum application owing to the differences in the underlying analysis methods. In recognition of this, InterPro was developed as an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites, to rationalise the complementary efforts of the individual protein signature database projects. The member databases - PRINTS, PROSITE, Pfam, ProDom, SMART and TIGRFAMs - form the InterPro core. Related signatures from each member database are unified into single InterPro entries. Each InterPro entry includes a unique accession number, functional descriptions and literature references, and links are made back to the relevant member database(s). Release 4.0 of InterPro (November 2001) contains 4,691 entries, representing 3,532 families, 1,068 domains, 74 repeats and 15 sites of post-translational modification (PTMs) encoded by different regular expressions, profiles, fingerprints and hidden Markov models (HMMs). Each InterPro entry lists all the matches against SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL (2,141,621 InterPro hits from 586,124 SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL protein sequences). The database is freely accessible for text- and sequence-based searches.
Nicola J. Mulder, Rolf Apweiler, Terri K. Attwood, Amos Bairoch, Alex Bateman, David Binns, Margaret Biswas, Paul Bradley, Peer Bork, Philipp Bucher, Richard R. Copley, Emmanuel Courcelle, Richard Durbin, Laurent Falquet, Wolfgang Fleischmann, Jérôme Gouzy, Sam Griffiths-Jones, Daniel H. Haft, Henning Hermjakob, Nicolas Hulo, Daniel Kahn, Alexander Kanapin, Maria Krestyaninova, Rodrigo Lopez, Ivica Letunic, Sue Orchard, Marco Pagni, David Peyruc, Chris P. Ponting, Florence Servant, Christian J. A. Sigrist
Briefings Bioinform.17
2002 The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs
abstract
MOTIVATION: The best quality multiple sequence alignments are generally considered to derive from structural superposition. However, no previous work has studied the relative performance of profile hidden Markov models (HMMs) derived from such alignments. Therefore several alignment methods have been used to generate multiple sequence alignments from 348 structurally aligned families in the HOMSTRAD database. The performance of profile HMMs derived from the structural and sequence-based alignments has been assessed for homologue detection. RESULTS: The best alignment methods studied here correctly align nearly 80% of residues with respect to structure alignments. Alignment quality and model sensitivity are found to be dependent on average number, length, and identity of sequences in the alignment. The striking conclusion is that, although structural data may improve the quality of multiple sequence alignments, this does not add to the ability of the derived profile HMMs to find sequence homologues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A list of HOMSTRAD families used in this study and the corresponding Pfam families is available at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Users/sgj/alignments/map.html CONTACT: [email protected]
Sam Griffiths-Jones, Alex Bateman
Bioinform.1