Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

A. Ignatowski

dblp:96/144 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › physical design › placement and routing
gate array placement and routing
0.011985
A hierarchical gate array architecture and design methodology · DAC 1985
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.011985
A hierarchical gate array architecture and design methodology · DAC 1985
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 A hierarchical gate array architecture and design methodology
abstract
A hierarchical gate array architecture and associated design methodology are presented. The hierarchical architecture has several advantages over conventional flat structures. A high gate density is achieved by separately optimizing local and global routing tradeoffs. Associated with the physical hierarchy is a hierarchical layout methodology, which reduces the difficulty of placement and routing by decomposing the process into several small independent operations. The architecture is optimized for fast processing and low cost by using a single level of E-beam direct-write programmable interconnect. The hierarchical placement and routing methodology is presented with results of placement and routing test cases. Finally, future enhancements are discussed.
M. Iachponi, D. Vail, S. Bierly, A. Ignatowski
DAC4