Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

R. Inkulu

dblp:96/2562 · also Rajasekhar Inkulu · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
6as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-7141-0977ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 67% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry
geometric data structures
0.212014
Two-Point L1 Shortest Path Queries in the Plane · SoCG 2014
Graph algorithms and graph theory
shortest path
0.212014
Two-Point L1 Shortest Path Queries in the Plane · SoCG 2014
Computational geometry › geometric data structures
shortest path queries
0.212014
Two-Point L1 Shortest Path Queries in the Plane · SoCG 2014
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel applications
irregular applications
0.112009
How much parallelism is there in irregular applications? · PPoPP 2009
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models
0.112009
How much parallelism is there in irregular applications? · PPoPP 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

obstacle avoidance · 0.2data structure design · 0.2optimistic parallel execution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Routing Among Convex Polygonal Obstacles in the Plane
R. Inkulu
COCOA1
2020 Vertex Fault-Tolerant Spanners for Weighted Points in Polygonal Domains
R. Inkulu, Apurv Singh
COCOA1
2020 Visibility Polygon Queries Among Dynamic Polygonal Obstacles in Plane
Sanjana Agrawal, R. Inkulu
COCOON2
2019 Geodesic Fault-Tolerant Additive Weighted Spanners
Sukanya Bhattacharjee, R. Inkulu
COCOON2
2019 Approximate Euclidean Shortest Paths in Polygonal Domains
abstract
Given a set $\mathcal{P}$ of $h$ pairwise disjoint simple polygonal obstacles in $\mathbb{R}^2$ defined with $n$ vertices, we compute a sketch $Ω$ of $\mathcal{P}$ whose size is independent of $n$, depending only on $h$ and the input parameter $ε$. We utilize $Ω$ to compute a $(1+ε)$-approximate geodesic shortest path between the two given points in $O(n + h((\lg{n}) + (\lg{h})^{1+δ} + (\frac{1}ε\lg{\frac{h}ε})))$ time. Here, $ε$ is a user parameter, and $δ$ is a small positive constant (resulting from the time for triangulating the free space of $\cal P$ using the algorithm in \cite{journals/ijcga/Bar-YehudaC94}). Moreover, we devise a $(2+ε)$-approximation algorithm to answer two-point Euclidean distance queries for the case of convex polygonal obstacles.
R. Inkulu, Sanjiv Kapoor
ISAAC1
2019 Minimum weight connectivity augmentation for planar straight-line graphs
Hugo A. Akitaya, R. Inkulu, Torrie L. Nichols, Diane L. Souvaine, Csaba D. Tóth, Charles R. Winston
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2018 Computing a Rectilinear Shortest Path amid Splinegons in Plane
Tameem Choudhury, R. Inkulu
COCOA2
2014 Two-Point L1 Shortest Path Queries in the Plane
abstract
Let P be a set of h pairwise-disjoint polygonal obstacles with a total of n vertices in the plane. In this paper, we consider the problem of building a data structure that can quickly compute an L1 shortest obstacle-avoiding path between any two query points s and t. We build a data structure of size O(n + h2 · log h · 4√log h) in O(n + h2 · log2 h · 4√log h) time that answers each query in O(log n + k) time, where k is the number of edges of the output path. Note that n + h2 · log2 h · 4√log h = O(n+h2+ϵ) for any constant ϵ > 0. We also extend our techniques to the weighted rectilinear version in which the "obstacles" of P are rectilinear regions with "weights" and allow L1 paths to travel through them with weighted costs. Our algorithm answers each query in O(log n + k) time with a data structure of size O(n2 · log n · 4√log n) that is built in O(n2 · log2 n · 4√log n) time.
Danny Ziyi Chen, R. Inkulu, Haitao Wang 0001
SoCG2
2009 How much parallelism is there in irregular applications?
abstract
Irregular programs are programs organized around pointer-based data structures such as trees and graphs. Recent investigations by the Galois project have shown that many irregular programs have a generalized form of data-parallelism called amorphous data-parallelism. However, in many programs, amorphous data-parallelism cannot be uncovered using static techniques, and its exploitation requires runtime strategies such as optimistic parallel execution. This raises a natural question: how much amorphous data-parallelism actually exists in irregular programs?
Milind Kulkarni 0001, Martin Burtscher, R. Inkulu, Keshav Pingali, Calin Cascaval
PPoPP3
2009 Visibility queries in a polygonal region
R. Inkulu, Sanjiv Kapoor
Comput. Geom.1
2009 Planar rectilinear shortest path computation using corridors
R. Inkulu, Sanjiv Kapoor
Comput. Geom.1
2007 Finding a Rectilinear Shortest Path in R2 Using Corridor Based Staircase Structures
R. Inkulu, Sanjiv Kapoor
FSTTCS1