Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sushanta Kumar Das Sutar

dblp:96/3583 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis › intrinsically disordered protein
intrinsically disordered protein prediction
0.012004
Comparative analysis of protein unfoldedness in human housekeeping and non-housekeeping proteins · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis
0.012004
Comparative analysis of protein unfoldedness in human housekeeping and non-housekeeping proteins · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.012004
Comparative analysis of protein unfoldedness in human housekeeping and non-housekeeping proteins · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
protein evolution
0.012004
Comparative analysis of protein unfoldedness in human housekeeping and non-housekeeping proteins · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uversky's prediction scheme · 0.0charge-hydrophobicity plot · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Comparative analysis of chromatin landscape in regulatory regions of human housekeeping and tissue specific genes
abstract
BACKGROUND: Global regulatory mechanisms involving chromatin assembly and remodelling in the promoter regions of genes is implicated in eukaryotic transcription control especially for genes subjected to spatial and temporal regulation. The potential to utilise global regulatory mechanisms for controlling gene expression might depend upon the architecture of the chromatin in and around the gene. In-silico analysis can yield important insights into this aspect, facilitating comparison of two or more classes of genes comprising of a large number of genes within each group. RESULTS: In the present study, we carried out a comparative analysis of chromatin characteristics in terms of the scaffold/matrix attachment regions, nucleosome formation potential and the occurrence of repetitive sequences, in the upstream regulatory regions of housekeeping and tissue specific genes. Our data show that putative scaffold/matrix attachment regions are more abundant and nucleosome formation potential is higher in the 5' regions of tissue specific genes as compared to the housekeeping genes. CONCLUSION: The differences in the chromatin features between the two groups of genes indicate the involvement of chromatin organisation in the control of gene expression. The presence of global regulatory mechanisms mediated through chromatin organisation can decrease the burden of invoking gene specific regulators for maintenance of the active/silenced state of gene expression. This could partially explain the lower number of genes estimated in the human genome.
Mythily Ganapathi, Pragya Srivastava, Sushanta Kumar Das Sutar, Dipayan Dasgupta, Gajinder Pal Singh, Vani Brahmachari, Samir K. Brahmachari
BMC Bioinform.3
2004 Comparative analysis of protein unfoldedness in human housekeeping and non-housekeeping proteins
abstract
Absence of any regular structure is increasingly being observed in structural studies of proteins. These disordered regions or random coils, which have been observed under physiological conditions, are indicators of protein plasticity. The wide variety of interactions possible due to the flexibility of these 'natively disordered' regions confers functional advantage to the protein and the organism in general. This concept is underscored by the increasing proportion of intrinsically unstructured proteins seen with the ascension in the complexity of the organisms. The 'natively unfolded/disordered' state of the protein can be predicted utilizing Uversky's or Dunker's algorithm. We utilized Uversky's prediction scheme and based on the unique position of a protein in the charge-hydrophobicity plot, a derived net score was used to predict the overall disorder of the human housekeeping and non-housekeeping proteins. Substantial numbers of proteins in both the classes were predicted to be unfolded. However, comparative genomic analysis of predicted unfolded Homo sapiens proteins with homologues in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and Mus musculus revealed significant increase in unfoldedness in non-housekeeping proteins in comparison with housekeeping proteins. Our analysis in the evolutionary context suggests addition or substitution of amino acid residues which favour unfoldedness in non-housekeeping proteins compared to housekeeping proteins.
Neeraj Pandey, Mythily Ganapathi, Dipayan Dasgupta, Sushanta Kumar Das Sutar, Debasis Dash
Bioinform.5