Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ioan Cristian Trelea

dblp:96/4442 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-6727-0716ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics › interactive visual analysis
collaborative visual analytics
0.412019
An Exploratory Study on Visual Exploration of Model Simulations by Multiple Types of Experts · CHI 2019
Design research and methods › research methodology
observational study
0.112019
An Exploratory Study on Visual Exploration of Model Simulations by Multiple Types of Experts · CHI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scatterplot matrix · 0.8observational study · 0.8linked views · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 An Exploratory Study on Visual Exploration of Model Simulations by Multiple Types of Experts
abstract
Experts in different domains rely increasingly on simulation models of complex processes to reach insights, make decisions, and plan future projects. These models are often used to study possible trade-offs, as experts try to optimise multiple conflicting objectives in a single investigation. Understanding all the model intricacies, however, is challenging for a single domain expert. We propose a simple approach to support multiple experts when exploring complex model results. First, we reduce the model exploration space, then present the results on a shared interactive surface, in the form of a scatterplot matrix and linked views. To explore how multiple experts analyse trade-offs using this setup, we carried out an observational study focusing on the link between expertise and insight generation during the analysis process. Our results reveal the different exploration strategies and multi-storyline approaches that domain experts adopt during trade-off analysis, and inform our recommendations for collaborative model exploration systems.
Nadia Boukhelifa, Anastasia Bezerianos, Ioan Cristian Trelea, Nathalie Perrot, Evelyne Lutton
CHI3
2003 The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection
Ioan Cristian Trelea
Inf. Process. Lett.1