EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samuel Burer
dblp:96/4845 · also Sam Burer
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5886-458XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 42% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
ensemble pruning |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Ensemble Pruning Via Semi-definite Programming · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 Sharing Classifiers among Ensembles from Related Problem Domains · ICDM 2005 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Ensemble Pruning Via Semi-definite Programming · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
semidefinite programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Ensemble Pruning Via Semi-definite Programming · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
subset selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Ensemble Pruning Via Semi-definite Programming · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Sharing Classifiers among Ensembles from Related Problem Domains · ICDM 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semidefinite programming · 0.1quadratic integer programming · 0.1boosting · 0.1bagging · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Optimization over Trained Neural Networks: Going Large with Gradient-Based Algorithms
Jiatai Tong, Thiago Serra, Samuel Burer |
CPAIOR | 4 |
| 2021 | Convex hull representations for bounded products of variables
Kurt M. Anstreicher, Samuel Burer, Kyungchan Park |
J. Glob. Optim. | 2 |
| 2006 | Ensemble Pruning Via Semi-definite ProgrammingabstractAn ensemble is a group of learning models that jointly solve a problem. However, the ensembles generated by existing techniques are sometimes unnecessarily large, which can lead to extra memory usage, computational costs, and occasional decreases in effectiveness. The purpose of ensemble pruning is to search for a good subset of ensemble members that performs as well as, or better than, the original ensemble. This subset selection problem is a combinatorial optimization problem and thus finding the exact optimal solution is computationally prohibitive. Various heuristic methods have been developed to obtain an approximate solution. However, most of the existing heuristics use simple greedy search as the optimization method, which lacks either theoretical or empirical quality guarantees. In this paper, the ensemble subset selection problem is formulated as a quadratic integer programming problem. By applying semi-definite programming (SDP) as a solution technique, we are able to get better approximate solutions. Computational experiments show that this SDP-based pruning algorithm outperforms other heuristics in the literature. Its application in a classifier-sharing study also demonstrates the effectiveness of the method. Yi Zhang 0006, Samuel Burer, W. Nick Street |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2005 | Sharing Classifiers among Ensembles from Related Problem DomainsabstractA classification ensemble is a group of classifiers that all solve the same prediction problem in different ways. It is well-known that combining the predictions of classifiers within the same problem domain using techniques like bagging or boosting often improves the performance. This research shows that sharing classifiers among different but closely related problem domains can also be helpful. In addition, a semi-definite programming based ensemble pruning method is implemented in order to optimize the selection of a subset of classifiers for each problem domain. Computational results on a catalog dataset indicate that the ensembles resulting from sharing classifiers among different product categories generally have larger AUCs than those ensembles trained only on their own categories. The pruning algorithm not only prevents the occasional decrease of effectiveness caused by conflicting concepts among the problem domains, but also provides a better understanding of the problem domains and their relationships. Yi Zhang 0006, W. Nick Street, Samuel Burer |
ICDM | 3 |
| 2005 | D.C. Versus Copositive Bounds for Standard QP
Kurt M. Anstreicher, Samuel Burer |
J. Glob. Optim. | 2 |