Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samaradasa Weerahandi
dblp:96/4854
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
software quality metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Software Quality Measurement Based on Fault-Detection Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1994 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software configuration management › software release management
software release |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Software Quality Measurement Based on Fault-Detection Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weibull distribution · 0.0statistical modeling · 0.0pareto distribution · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Software Quality Measurement Based on Fault-Detection DataabstractWe develop a methodology to measure the quality levels of a number of releases of a software product in its evolution process. The proposed quality measurement plan is based on the faults detected in field operation of the software. We describe how fault discovery data can be analyzed and reported in a framework very similar to that of the QMP (quality measurement plan) proposed by B. Hoadley (1986). The proposed procedure is especially useful in situations where one has only very little data from the latest release. We present details of implementation of solutions to a class of models on the distribution of fault detection times. The conditions under which the families: exponential, Weibull, or Pareto distributions might be appropriate for fault detection times are discussed. In a variety of typical data sets that we investigated one of these families was found to provide a good fit for the data. The proposed methodology is illustrated with an example involving three releases of a software product, where the fault detection times are exponentially distributed. Another example for a situation where the exponential fit is not good enough is also considered.> Samaradasa Weerahandi, Robert E. Hausman |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |