Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raúl Vázquez

dblp:96/5306 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-6394-4225ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 8 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 34% Machine translation · 28% Generative modeling · 21%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning › numerical reasoning
number representation
1.012026
Language Models Learn Universal Representations of Numbers and Here's Why You Should Care · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
numerical reasoning
1.012026
Language Models Learn Universal Representations of Numbers and Here's Why You Should Care · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
evaluation of language models
0.912025
Your Model is Overconfident, and Other Lies We Tell Ourselves · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › synthetic data generation
LLM-based data generation
0.912025
Scaling Low-Resource MT via Synthetic Data Generation with LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
low-resource machine translation
0.912025
Scaling Low-Resource MT via Synthetic Data Generation with LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic data generation
0.912025
Scaling Low-Resource MT via Synthetic Data Generation with LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.912025
Your Model is Overconfident, and Other Lies We Tell Ourselves · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
multilingual neural machine translation
0.512021
An Empirical Investigation of Word Alignment Supervision for Zero-Shot Multilingual Neural Machine Translation · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation › multilingual neural machine translation
zero-shot translation
0.512021
An Empirical Investigation of Word Alignment Supervision for Zero-Shot Multilingual Neural Machine Translation · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
emergent representations
0.312026
Language Models Learn Universal Representations of Numbers and Here's Why You Should Care · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration
0.312025
Your Model is Overconfident, and Other Lies We Tell Ourselves · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probing · 1.0training dynamics analysis · 0.9back-translation · 0.9annotator dissensus analysis · 0.9LLM-based data generation · 0.9word alignment supervision · 0.5transformer · 0.5cross-attention · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Language Models Learn Universal Representations of Numbers and Here's Why You Should Care
abstract
Michal Štefánik, Timothee Mickus, Marek Kadlčík, Bertram Højer, Michal Spiegel, Raúl Vázquez, Aman Sinha, Josef Kuchař, Philipp Mondorf, Pontus Stenetorp. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Michal Stefánik, Timothee Mickus, Marek Kadlcík, Bertram Højer, Michal Spiegel, Raúl Vázquez, Aman Sinha 0002, Josef Kuchar, Philipp Mondorf, Pontus Stenetorp
ACL (1)6
2026 Confabulations from ACL Publications (CAP): A Dataset for Scientific Hallucination Detection
Federica Gamba, Aman Sinha 0002, Timothee Mickus, Raúl Vázquez, Patanjali Bhamidipati, Claudio Savelli, Ahana Chattopadhyay, Laura A. Zanella, Yash Kankanampati, Binesh Arakkal Remesh, Aryan Ashok Chandramania, Chuyuan Li, Ioana Buhnila, Radhika Mamidi
LREC4
2026 Building Multimodal Corpora Using Microtask Pipelines and Local Annotators
abstract
Peer reviewed
Helmiina Hotti, Raúl Vázquez, Anna-Kaisa Jokipohja, Timo Kalliokoski, Henna Paakki, Rosa Suviranta, Tuomo Hiippala
LREC2
2025 Your Model is Overconfident, and Other Lies We Tell Ourselves
abstract
The difficulty intrinsic to a given example, rooted in its inherent ambiguity, is a key yet often overlooked factor in evaluating neural NLP models.We investigate the interplay and divergence among various metrics for assessing intrinsic difficulty, including annotator dissensus, training dynamics, and model confidence.Through a comprehensive analysis using 29 models on three datasets, we reveal that while correlations exist among these metrics, their relationships are neither linear nor monotonic.By disentangling these dimensions of uncertainty, we aim to refine our understanding of data complexity and its implications for evaluating and improving NLP models.
Timothee Mickus, Aman Sinha 0002, Raúl Vázquez
ACL (1)3
2025 Scaling Low-Resource MT via Synthetic Data Generation with LLMs
abstract
Ona de Gibert, Joseph Attieh, Teemu Vahtola, Mikko Aulamo, Zihao Li, Raúl Vázquez, Tiancheng Hu, Jörg Tiedemann. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Ona de Gibert Bonet, Joseph Attieh, Teemu Vahtola, Mikko Aulamo, Raúl Vázquez, Tiancheng Hu, Jörg Tiedemann
EMNLP6
2022 A Closer Look at Parameter Contributions When Training Neural Language and Translation Models
abstract
We analyze the learning dynamics of neural language and translation models using Loss Change Allocation (LCA), an indicator that enables a fine-grained analysis of parameter updates when optimizing for the loss function. In other words, we can observe the contributions of different network components at training time. In this article, we systematically study masked language modeling, causal language modeling, and machine translation. We show that the choice of training objective leads to distinctive optimization procedures, even when performed on comparable Transformer architectures. We demonstrate how the various Transformer parameters are used during training, supporting that the feed-forward components of each layer are the main contributors to the optimization procedure. Finally, we find that the learning dynamics are not affected by data size and distribution but rather determined by the learning objective.
Raúl Vázquez, Hande Çelikkanat, Vinit Ravishankar, Mathias Creutz, Jörg Tiedemann
COLING1
2022 Latest Development in the FoTran Project - Scaling Up Language Coverage in Neural Machine Translation Using Distributed Training with Language-Specific Components
abstract
We describe the enhancement of a multilingual NMT toolkit developed as part of the FoTran project. We devise our modular attention-bridge model, which connects language-specific components through a shared network layer. The system now supports distributed training over many nodes and GPUs in order to substantially scale up the number of languages that can be included in a modern neural translation architecture. The model enables the study of emerging language-agnostic representations and also provides a modular toolkit for efficient machine translation.
Raúl Vázquez, Michele Boggia, Alessandro Raganato, Niki Andreas Lopi, Stig-Arne Grönroos, Jörg Tiedemann
EAMT1
2021 An Empirical Investigation of Word Alignment Supervision for Zero-Shot Multilingual Neural Machine Translation
abstract
Zero-shot translations is a fascinating feature of Multilingual Neural Machine Translation (MNMT) systems. These MNMT models are usually trained on English-centric data, i.e. English either as the source or target language, and with a language label prepended to the input indicating the target language. However, recent work has highlighted several flaws of these models in zero-shot scenarios where language labels are ignored and the wrong language is generated or different runs show highly unstable results. In this paper, we investigate the benefits of an explicit alignment to language labels in Transformer-based MNMT models in the zero-shot context, by jointly training one cross attention head with word alignment supervision to stress the focus on the target language label. We compare and evaluate several MNMT systems on three multilingual MT benchmarks of different sizes, showing that simply supervising one cross attention head to focus both on word alignments and language labels reduces the bias towards translating into the wrong language, improving the zero-shot performance overall. Moreover, as an additional advantage, we find that our alignment supervision leads to more stable results across different training runs.
Alessandro Raganato, Raúl Vázquez, Mathias Creutz, Jörg Tiedemann
EMNLP (1)2
2020 A Systematic Study of Inner-Attention-Based Sentence Representations in Multilingual Neural Machine Translation
abstract
Neural machine translation has considerably improved the quality of automatic translations by learning good representations of input sentences. In this article, we explore a multilingual translation model capable of producing fixed-size sentence representations by incorporating an intermediate crosslingual shared layer, which we refer to as attention bridge. This layer exploits the semantics from each language and develops into a language-agnostic meaning representation that can be efficiently used for transfer learning. We systematically study the impact of the size of the attention bridge and the effect of including additional languages in the model. In contrast to related previous work, we demonstrate that there is no conflict between translation performance and the use of sentence representations in downstream tasks. In particular, we show that larger intermediate layers not only improve translation quality, especially for long sentences, but also push the accuracy of trainable classification tasks. Nevertheless, shorter representations lead to increased compression that is beneficial in non-trainable similarity tasks. Similarly, we show that trainable downstream tasks benefit from multilingual models, whereas additional language signals do not improve performance in non-trainable benchmarks. This is an important insight that helps to properly design models for specific applications. Finally, we also include an in-depth analysis of the proposed attention bridge and its ability to encode linguistic properties. We carefully analyze the information that is captured by individual attention heads and identify interesting patterns that explain the performance of specific settings in linguistic probing tasks.
Raúl Vázquez, Alessandro Raganato, Mathias Creutz, Jörg Tiedemann
Comput. Linguistics1