Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam T. Temple
dblp:96/5580
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet architecture and protocols · 67% Network management and operations · 33% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet architecture and protocols
integrated services |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | MAGNET II: A Metropolitan Area Network Based on Asynchronous Time Sharing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1990 |
Network management and operations
quality of service management |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | MAGNET II: A Metropolitan Area Network Based on Asynchronous Time Sharing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1990 |
Internet architecture and protocols › traffic management
traffic control |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | MAGNET II: A Metropolitan Area Network Based on Asynchronous Time Sharing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1990 |
Distributed systems › experimental testbed
network testbed |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | MAGNET II: A Metropolitan Area Network Based on Asynchronous Time Sharing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
traffic monitoring · 0.0media access control · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | MAGNET II: A Metropolitan Area Network Based on Asynchronous Time SharingabstractMAGNET II is a testbed for integrated networks. It was designed and implemented based on requirements of real-time network management and control. Quality-of-service requirements explicitly appear in the design specifications of the network on the media access level. Switching is based on the concept of asynchronous time sharing. The core of the network distinguishes between three traffic classes. The quality of service of these classes is monitored and controlled by the traffic-control architecture of the network. Monitoring is supported by observation units distributed throughout the system. The main network resources, switching bandwidth, communication bandwidth, and buffer space, are observable and controllable.> Aurel A. Lazar, Adam T. Temple, Rafael Gidron |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 2 |