Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stéphane Christy

dblp:96/6985 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
3D vision · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration
0.031996
Euclidean Shape and Motion from Multiple Perspective Views by Affine Iterations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996
Object Pose: Links Between Paraperspective and Perspective · ICCV 1995
Euclidean Reconstruction: From Paraperspective to Perspective · ECCV (2) 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › geometric reconstruction
euclidean reconstruction
0.011996
Euclidean Shape and Motion from Multiple Perspective Views by Affine Iterations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.011996
Euclidean Shape and Motion from Multiple Perspective Views by Affine Iterations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996
Geometric modeling and processing › 3d reconstruction › multi-view reconstruction
euclidean reconstruction
0.011996
Euclidean Reconstruction: From Paraperspective to Perspective · ECCV (2) 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision
object pose estimation
0.011995
Object Pose: Links Between Paraperspective and Perspective · ICCV 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perspective projection · 0.0paraperspective projection · 0.0paraperspective camera model · 0.0affine iteration · 0.0orthogonality constraint · 0.0iterative paraperspective algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Iterative Pose Computation from Line Correspondences
Stéphane Christy, Radu Horaud
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.1
1997 Fast and Reliable Object Pose Estimation from Line Correspondences
Stéphane Christy, Radu Horaud
CAIP1
1997 Euclidean reconstruction and affine camera calibration using controlled robot motions
abstract
We are addressing the problem of Euclidean reconstruction with an uncalibrated affine camera and the calibration of this camera. We investigate constraints under which the Euclidean shape and motion problem becomes linear. The theoretical study described in this paper leads us to impose some practical constraints that the camera is mounted onto a robot arm and that the robot is executing controlled motions whose parameters are known. The affine camera model considered here is just an approximation of the true projective mapping. Nevertheless, there is a large number of applications for which the camera is allowed to be at some distance from the scene and under these circumstances the affine model is a good approximation. The fact that we deal with an uncalibrated camera is an advantage over previous methods because we do not rely any more on the tedious task of camera calibration. The experimental results obtained show that the method described compares favourably with other similar methods.
Radu Horaud, Stéphane Christy, Roger Mohr
IROS2
1996 Euclidean Reconstruction: From Paraperspective to Perspective
Stéphane Christy, Radu Horaud
ECCV (2)1
1996 Euclidean Shape and Motion from Multiple Perspective Views by Affine Iterations
abstract
We describe a method for solving the Euclidean reconstruction problem with a perspective camera model by incrementally performing Euclidean reconstruction with either a weak or a paraperspective camera model. With respect to other methods that compute shape and motion from a sequence of images with a calibrated camera, this method converges in a few iterations, is computationally efficient, and solves for the sign (reversal) ambiguity. We give a detailed account of the method, analyze its convergence, and test it with both synthetic and real data.
Stéphane Christy, Radu Horaud
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1995 Object Pose: Links Between Paraperspective and Perspective
abstract
D.F. Dementhon and L.S. Davis (1995) proposed a method for determining the pose of a 3D object with respect to a camera from 3D to 2D point correspondences. The method consists of iteratively improving the pose computed with a weak perspective camera model to converge at the limit, to a pose estimation computed with a perspective camera model. We show that the method of Dementhon and Davis can be extended to paraperspective. The iterative paraperspective pose algorithm that we describe in detail has interesting properties both in terms of speed and rate of convergence. Moreover, we introduce a simple way of taking into account the orthogonality constraint associated with the rotation matrix and we define the optimal experimental setup to be used in the presence of camera calibration errors.>
Radu Horaud, Stéphane Christy, Fadi Dornaika, Bart Lamiroy
ICCV2
1995 A quasi linear reconstruction method from multiple perspective views
abstract
In this paper we describe a method for solving the Euclidean reconstruction problem with a perspective camera model by incrementally performing an Euclidean reconstruction with a weak perspective camera model. With respect to other methods that compute shape and motion from a sequence of images with a calibrated perspective camera, this method converges in a few iterations, is compositionally efficient, and does not suffer from the nonlinear nature of the problem. With respect to factorization and/or affine-invariant methods, this method solves for the sign (reversal) ambiguity in a very simple way and provides much more accurate reconstructions results.
Stéphane Christy, Radu Horaud
IROS (2)1