Chris Hinrichs

dblp:96/7426 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Medical and health informatics · 80% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 20%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Segmentation and scene understanding · 77% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
neuroimaging
0.432013
Speeding up Permutation Testing in Neuroimaging · NIPS 2013
Q-MKL: Matrix-induced Regularization in Multi-Kernel Learning with Applications to Neuroimaging · NIPS 2012
Epitome driven 3-D Diffusion Tensor image segmentation: on extracting specific structures · NIPS 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › kernel methods
multiple kernel learning
0.112012
Q-MKL: Matrix-induced Regularization in Multi-Kernel Learning with Applications to Neuroimaging · NIPS 2012
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.112010
Epitome driven 3-D Diffusion Tensor image segmentation: on extracting specific structures · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel learning
0.112010
Learning kernels for variants of normalized cuts: Convex relaxations and applications · CVPR 2010
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › probabilistic segmentation
markov random field segmentation
0.112010
Epitome driven 3-D Diffusion Tensor image segmentation: on extracting specific structures · NIPS 2010
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › graph-based segmentation
normalized cuts
0.112010
Learning kernels for variants of normalized cuts: Convex relaxations and applications · CVPR 2010
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging › diffusion MRI analysis
diffusion tensor imaging
0.112010
Epitome driven 3-D Diffusion Tensor image segmentation: on extracting specific structures · NIPS 2010
Machine learning and data management › kernel methods › kernel learning
multiple kernel learning
0.112010
Learning kernels for variants of normalized cuts: Convex relaxations and applications · CVPR 2010
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis › neurodegenerative disease diagnosis
alzheimer's disease prediction
0.012012
Q-MKL: Matrix-induced Regularization in Multi-Kernel Learning with Applications to Neuroimaging · NIPS 2012
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
co-segmentation
0.012010
Epitome driven 3-D Diffusion Tensor image segmentation: on extracting specific structures · NIPS 2010
Mathematical optimization
convex relaxation
0.012010
Learning kernels for variants of normalized cuts: Convex relaxations and applications · CVPR 2010
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
SDP relaxation
0.012010
Learning kernels for variants of normalized cuts: Convex relaxations and applications · CVPR 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

convex relaxation · 0.3SDP relaxation · 0.3markov random field · 0.2epitome model · 0.2combinatorial approximation · 0.2matrix completion · 0.2support vector machine · 0.1multiple kernel learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Speeding up Permutation Testing in Neuroimaging
abstract
Multiple hypothesis testing is a significant problem in nearly all neuroimaging studies. In order to correct for this phenomena, we require a reliable estimate of the Family-Wise Error Rate (FWER). The well known Bonferroni correction method, while being simple to implement, is quite conservative, and can substantially under-power a study because it ignores dependencies between test statistics. Permutation testing, on the other hand, is an exact, non parametric method of estimating the FWER for a given α threshold, but for acceptably low thresholds the computational burden can be prohibitive. In this paper, we observe that permutation testing in fact amounts to populating the columns of a very large matrix P. By analyzing the spectrum of this matrix, under certain conditions, we see that P has a low-rank plus a low-variance residual decomposition which makes it suitable for highly sub–sampled — on the order of 0.5% — matrix completion methods. Thus, we propose a novel permutation testing methodology which offers a large speedup, without sacrificing the fidelity of the estimated FWER. Our valuations on four different neuroimaging datasets show that a computational speedup factor of roughly 50× can be achieved while recovering the FWER distribution up to very high accuracy. Further, we show that the estimated α threshold is also recovered faithfully, and is stable.
Chris Hinrichs, Vamsi K. Ithapu, Qinyuan Sun, Sterling C. Johnson
NIPS1
2012 Q-MKL: Matrix-induced Regularization in Multi-Kernel Learning with Applications to Neuroimaging
abstract
Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) generalizes SVMs to the setting where one simultaneously trains a linear classifier and chooses an optimal combination of given base kernels. Model complexity is typically controlled using various norm regularizations on the vector of base kernel mixing coefficients. Existing methods, however, neither regularize nor exploit potentially useful information pertaining to how kernels in the input set 'interact'; that is, higher order kernel-pair relationships that can be easily obtained via unsupervised (similarity, geodesics), supervised (correlation in errors), or domain knowledge driven mechanisms (which features were used to construct the kernel?). We show that by substituting the norm penalty with an arbitrary quadratic function Q \succeq 0, one can impose a desired covariance structure on mixing coefficient selection, and use this as an inductive bias when learning the concept. This formulation significantly generalizes the widely used 1- and 2-norm MKL objectives. We explore the model’s utility via experiments on a challenging Neuroimaging problem, where the goal is to predict a subject’s conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) by exploiting aggregate information from several distinct imaging modalities. Here, our new model outperforms the state of the art (p-values << 10−3 ). We briefly discuss ramifications in terms of learning bounds (Rademacher complexity).
Chris Hinrichs, Jiming Peng, Sterling C. Johnson
NIPS1
2011 Topology-Based Kernels With Application to Inference Problems in Alzheimer's Disease
abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) research has recently witnessed a great deal of activity focused on developing new statistical learning tools for automated inference using imaging data. The workhorse for many of these techniques is the support vector machine (SVM) framework (or more generally kernel-based methods). Most of these require, as a first step, specification of a kernel matrix K between input examples (i.e., images). The inner product between images I(i) and I(j) in a feature space can generally be written in closed form and so it is convenient to treat K as "given." However, in certain neuroimaging applications such an assumption becomes problematic. As an example, it is rather challenging to provide a scalar measure of similarity between two instances of highly attributed data such as cortical thickness measures on cortical surfaces. Note that cortical thickness is known to be discriminative for neurological disorders, so leveraging such information in an inference framework, especially within a multi-modal method, is potentially advantageous. But despite being clinically meaningful, relatively few works have successfully exploited this measure for classification or regression. Motivated by these applications, our paper presents novel techniques to compute similarity matrices for such topologically-based attributed data. Our ideas leverage recent developments to characterize signals (e.g., cortical thickness) motivated by the persistence of their topological features, leading to a scheme for simple constructions of kernel matrices. As a proof of principle, on a dataset of 356 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study, we report good performance on several statistical inference tasks without any feature selection, dimensionality reduction, or parameter tuning.
Deepti Pachauri, Chris Hinrichs, Moo K. Chung, Sterling C. Johnson
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging2
2010 Learning kernels for variants of normalized cuts: Convex relaxations and applications
abstract
We propose a new algorithm for learning kernels for variants of the Normalized Cuts (NCuts) objective - i.e., given a set of training examples with known partitions, how should a basis set of similarity functions be combined to induce NCuts favorable distributions. Such a procedure facilitates design of good affinity matrices. It also helps assess the importance of different feature types for discrimination. Rather than formulating the learning problem in terms of the spectral relaxation, the alternative we pursue here is to work in the original discrete setting (i.e., the relaxation occurs much later). We show that this strategy is useful - while the initial specification seems rather difficult to optimize efficiently, a set of manipulations reveal a related model which permits a nice SDP relaxation. A salient feature of our model is that the eventual problem size is only a function of the number of input kernels and not the training set size. This relaxation also allows strong optimality guarantees, if certain conditions are satisfied. We show that the sub-kernel weights obtained provide a complementary approach for MKL based methods. Our experiments on Caltech101 and ADNI (a brain imaging dataset) show that the quality of solutions is competitive with the state-of-the-art.
Lopamudra Mukherjee, Jiming Peng, Chris Hinrichs
CVPR4
2010 Epitome driven 3-D Diffusion Tensor image segmentation: on extracting specific structures
abstract
We study the problem of segmenting specific white matter structures of interest from Diffusion Tensor (DT-MR) images of the human brain. This is an important requirement in many Neuroimaging studies: for instance, to evaluate whether a brain structure exhibits group level differences as a function of disease in a set of images. Typically, interactive expert guided segmentation has been the method of choice for such applications, but this is tedious for large datasets common today. To address this problem, we endow an image segmentation algorithm with 'advice' encoding some global characteristics of the region(s) we want to extract. This is accomplished by constructing (using expert-segmented images) an epitome of a specific region - as a histogram over a bag of 'words' (e.g.,suitable feature descriptors). Now, given such a representation, the problem reduces to segmenting new brain image with additional constraints that enforce consistency between the segmented foreground and the pre-specified histogram over features. We present combinatorial approximation algorithms to incorporate such domain specific constraints for Markov Random Field (MRF) segmentation. Making use of recent results on image co-segmentation, we derive effective solution strategies for our problem. We provide an analysis of solution quality, and present promising experimental evidence showing that many structures of interest in Neuroscience can be extracted reliably from 3-D brain image volumes using our algorithm.
Kamiya Motwani, Nagesh Adluru, Chris Hinrichs, Andrew L. Alexander
NIPS3
2009 MKL for Robust Multi-modality AD Classification
Chris Hinrichs, Guofan Xu, Sterling C. Johnson
MICCAI (1)1