Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
R. Fabian W. Pease
dblp:96/7962 · also R. F. W. Pease
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 98% Integrated circuit design · 2% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › physical design › lithography
electron beam lithography |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics · Proc. IEEE 2008 Limits of nano-gate fabrication · Proc. IEEE 1991 |
Electronic design automation › physical design
lithography |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics · Proc. IEEE 2008 Limits of nano-gate fabrication · Proc. IEEE 1991 |
Electronic design automation › semiconductor manufacturing
mask generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics · Proc. IEEE 2008 |
Electronic design automation
semiconductor manufacturing |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics · Proc. IEEE 2008 |
Electronic design automation › semiconductor manufacturing
resolution enhancement techniques |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics · Proc. IEEE 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nanoimprint lithography · 0.1immersion optics · 0.1extreme ultraviolet lithography · 0.1sacrificial layer patterning · 0.0e-beam exposure · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future ElectronicsabstractFor all technologies, from flint arrowheads to DNA microarrays, patterning the functional material is crucial. For semiconductor integrated circuits (ICs), it is even more critical than for most technologies because enormous benefits accrue to going smaller, notably higher speed and much less energy consumed per computing function. The consensus is that ICs will continue to be manufactured until at least the ldquo22 nm noderdquo (the linewidth of an equal line-space pattern). Most patterning of ICs takes place on the wafer in two steps: (a) lithography, the patterning of a resist film on top of the functional material; and (b) transferring the resist pattern into the functional material, usually by etching. Here we concentrate on lithography. Optics has continued to be the chosen lithographic route despite its continually forecast demise. A combination of 193-nm radiation, immersion optics, and computer-intensive resolution enhancement technology will probably be used for the 45- and 32-nm nodes. Optical lithography usually requires that we first make a mask and then project the mask pattern onto a resist-coated wafer. Making a qualified mask, although originally dismissed as a ldquosupport technology,rdquo now represents a significant fraction of the total cost of patterning an IC largely because of the measures needed to push resolution so far beyond the normal limit of optical resolution. Thus, although optics has demonstrated features well below 22 nm, it is not clear that optics will be the most economical in this range; nanometer-scale mechanical printing is a strong contender, extreme ultraviolet is still the official front runner, and electron beam lithography, which has demonstrated minimum features less than 10 nm wide, continues to be developed both for mask making and for directly writing on the wafer (also known as ldquomaskless lithographyrdquo). Going from laboratory demonstration to manufacturing technology is enormously expensive ( $1 billion) and for good reason. Just in terms of data rate (mask pattern to resist pattern), today's exposure tools achieve about 10 Tb/s at an allowable error rate of about 1/h; this data rate will double with each generation. In addition, the edge placement precision required will soon be 30 parts per billion. There are so many opportunities for unacceptable performance that making the right decision goes far beyond understanding the underlying physical principles. But the benefits of continuing to be able to manufacture electronics at the 22-nm node and beyond appear to justify the investment, and there is no shortage of ideas on how to accomplish this. R. Fabian W. Pease, Stephen Y. Chou |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |
| 1998 | Exploiting structure in positioning of nonsymmetric signalsabstractOne of the most crucial emerging challenges in lithography is achieving rapid and accurate alignment under a wide variety of conditions brought about by different processing steps. Current alignment algorithms assume symmetric alignment signals. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm based on subspace decomposition of alignment signals. We assume that the process-induced asymmetries are small enough so that only linear effects need to be considered. We first find the subspace of alignment signals using a set of signals with pre-known positions. The position of a new signal is calculated considering that, if shifted correctly, it will lie in the same subspace of previous signals. Since this method exploits the structure of the signals, it results in more accurate measurement of the position. Simulation results show that the alignment error is about an order of magnitude smaller than that achieved with conventional maximum likelihood or phase-fitting approaches. Amir A. Ghazanfarian, Thomas Kailath, Mark A. McCord, R. Fabian W. Pease |
ICASSP | 5 |
| 1991 | Limits of nano-gate fabricationabstractThe authors review the limits of nanometer-scale gate electrode (nano-gate) fabrication. The technology to fabricate nano-gates has become increasingly important in recent years as the scaling limits of conventional electronic devices and the quantum effects of novel devices are investigated. Consistent with the technology used to fabricate virtually all of the smallest devices to date, the emphasis is on the resolution limits of electron beam lithography and associated ultrahigh resolution resists. Recent results of directly patterning SiO/sub 2/ with nanometer-scale resolution by e-beam exposure through a sacrificial layer are also presented. Because the high resistance normally associated with nanometer-scale electrodes seriously limits the performance of high-frequency devices, various techniques to reduce the gate resistance are compared.> David R. Allee, Alec N. Broers, R. Fabian W. Pease |
Proc. IEEE | 3 |