EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Hick
dblp:96/8523
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 59% High-performance computing · 41% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network measurement and analytics · 50% Routing and switching · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network measurement and analytics
traffic characterization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | On using virtual circuits for GridFTP transfers · SC 2012 |
Routing and switching › packet switching
virtual circuit |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | On using virtual circuits for GridFTP transfers · SC 2012 |
Distributed systems › replication
data replication |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Lessons learned from moving earth system grid data sets over a 20 Gbps wide-area network · HPDC 2010 |
Distributed systems › grid computing
grid middleware |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Lessons learned from moving earth system grid data sets over a 20 Gbps wide-area network · HPDC 2010 |
High-performance computing › data transfer
wide-area data transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Lessons learned from moving earth system grid data sets over a 20 Gbps wide-area network · HPDC 2010 |
High-performance computing › data transfer
scientific data transfer |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | On using virtual circuits for GridFTP transfers · SC 2012 |
Environmental and earth informatics
climate modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Lessons learned from moving earth system grid data sets over a 20 Gbps wide-area network · HPDC 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
log analysis · 0.3monitoring · 0.2bandwidth tuning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Investigative Report on Electrical Commissioning in HPC Data CentersabstractThe Energy Efficient High Performance Computing Working Group (EE HPC WG) has assembled a small diverse team to write a short investigative report on electrical commissioning. The purpose of the investigative report is to evaluate the need for electrical commissioning guidelines specific to High Performance Computing (HPC) data centers given their unique IT equipment load densities and power profiles. It is the consensus of the team that special electrical commissioning guidelines are needed and the EE HPC WG will author the initial guidelines. The scope of the guidelines will include the static and dynamic electrical aspects of commissioning practices that are specific to high performance computing and more importantly, cover the transient aspects of electrical commissioning. The fluctuating nature of many compute nodes can dramatically influence generation, transmission, and distribution of electrical power. HPC data center lessons learned and best practices will be examined and used to enhance the electrical commissioning guidelines. The primary audience for the guidelines is facility engineers and operators of HPC data centers. The guidelines will also be applicable to others that support HPC data centers, ranging from utilities and their electrical grid infrastructure to IT equipment manufacturers whose machines are being commissioned at the end of the process. Joseph F. Prisco, Grant L. Stewart, Herbert Huber, Randy Rannow, Jason Hick, Dave Martinez, Brandon Hong, Aditya M. Deshpande |
CLUSTER | 5 |
| 2012 | On using virtual circuits for GridFTP transfersabstractThe goal of this work is to characterize scientific data transfers and to determine the suitability of dynamic virtual circuit service for these transfers instead of the currently used IP-routed service. Specifically, logs collected by servers executing a commonly used scientific data transfer application, GridFTP, are obtained from three US super-computing/scientific research centers, NERSC, SLAC, and NCAR, and analyzed. Dynamic virtual circuit (VC) service, a relatively new offering from providers such as ESnet and Internet2, allows for the selection of a path on which a rate-guaranteed connection is established prior to data transfer. Given VC setup overhead, the first analysis of the GridFTP transfer logs characterizes the duration of sessions, where a session consists of multiple back-to-back transfers executed in batch mode between the same two GridFTP servers. Of the NCAR-NICS sessions analyzed, 56% of all sessions (90% of all transfers) would have been long enough to be served with dynamic VC service. An analysis of transfer logs across four paths, NCAR-NICS, SLAC-BNL, NERSC-ORNL and NERSC-ANL, shows significant throughput variance, where NICS, BNL, ORNL, and ANL are other US national laboratories. For example, on the NERSC-ORNL path, the inter-quartile range was 695 Mbps, with a maximum value of 3.64 Gbps and a minimum value of 758 Mbps. An analysis of the impact of various factors that are potential causes of this variance is also presented. Zhengyang Liu 0005, Malathi Veeraraghavan, Chris Tracy, Jing Tie, Ian T. Foster, John M. Dennis, Jason Hick, Yee-Ting Li |
SC | 8 |
| 2010 | Lessons learned from moving earth system grid data sets over a 20 Gbps wide-area networkabstractIn preparation for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report, the climate community will run the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP-5) experiments, which are designed to answer crucial questions about future regional climate change and the results of carbon feedback for different mitigation scenarios. The CMIP-5 experiments will generate petabytes of data that must be replicated seamlessly, reliably, and quickly to hundreds of research teams around the globe. As an end-to-end test of the technologies that will be used to perform this task, a multi-disciplinary team of researchers moved a small portion (10 TB) of the multimodel Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 3 data set used in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report from three sources---the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility (ALCF), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)---to the 2009 Supercomputing conference (SC09) show floor in Portland, Oregon, over circuits provided by DOE's ESnet. The team achieved a sustained data rate of 15 Gb/s on a 20 Gb/s network. More important, this effort provided critical feedback on how to deploy, tune, and monitor the middleware that will be used to replicate the upcoming petascale climate datasets. We report on obstacles overcome and the key lessons learned from this successful bandwidth challenge effort. Rajkumar Kettimuthu, Alex Sim, Dan Gunter, William E. Allcock, Peer-Timo Bremer, John Bresnahan, Andrew Cherry, Lisa Childers, Eli Dart, Ian T. Foster, Kevin Harms, Jason Hick, Jason Lee 0001, Michael Link, Jeff Long, Keith Miller 0005, Vijaya Natarajan, Valerio Pascucci, Kenneth Raffenetti, David Ressman, Dean N. Williams, Loren Wilson, Linda Winkler |
HPDC | 12 |