Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Udit Sharma
dblp:96/892
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 87% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
temporal question answering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
fact extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
open-domain question answering · 0.7language model · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact ExtractionabstractTemporal question answering (QA) is a special category of complex question answering task that requires reasoning over facts asserting time intervals of events.Previous works have predominately relied on Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) for temporal QA.One of the major challenges faced by these systems is their inability to retrieve all relevant facts due to factors such as incomplete KB and entity/relation linking errors (Patidar et al., 2022).A failure to fetch even a single fact will block KBQA from computing the answer.Such cases of KB incompleteness are even more profound in the temporal context.To address this issue, we explore an interesting direction where a targeted temporal fact extraction technique is used to assist KBQA whenever it fails to retrieve temporal facts from the KB.We model the extraction problem as an open-domain question answering task using offthe-shelf language models.This way, we target to extract from textual resources those facts that failed to get retrieved from the KB.Experimental results on two temporal QA benchmarks show promising ~30% & ~10% relative improvements in answer accuracies without any additional training cost. Nithish Kannen, Udit Sharma, Sumit Neelam, Dinesh Khandelwal, Shajith Ikbal, Hima P. Karanam, L. Venkata Subramaniam |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2020 | A sanitization approach for big data with improved data utility
Udit Sharma, Durga Toshniwal |
Appl. Intell. | 1 |