Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bangsheng Tang

dblp:96/9282 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Theory of computation · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 56% Automated reasoning and model checking · 37% Mathematical optimization · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 64% Data mining · 36%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.312017
Variational Deep Embedding: An Unsupervised and Generative Approach to Clustering · IJCAI 2017
Data mining
clustering
0.312017
Variational Deep Embedding: An Unsupervised and Generative Approach to Clustering · IJCAI 2017
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.212016
A Neural Autoregressive Approach to Collaborative Filtering · ICML 2016
Recommender systems › preference-based recommendation
ordinal preference modeling
0.212016
A Neural Autoregressive Approach to Collaborative Filtering · ICML 2016
Energy systems and smart grids
energy disaggregation
0.212015
On the Balance of Meter Deployment Cost and NILM Accuracy · IJCAI 2015
Computational complexity › proof complexity
algebraic proof systems
0.212013
Some trade-off results for polynomial calculus: extended abstract · STOC 2013
Computational complexity › lower bounds
exponential lower bounds
0.212013
Exponential Lower Bounds for the PPSZ k-SAT Algorithm · SODA 2013
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › k-SAT
k-SAT algorithms
0.212013
Exponential Lower Bounds for the PPSZ k-SAT Algorithm · SODA 2013
Computational complexity
proof complexity
0.212013
Some trade-off results for polynomial calculus: extended abstract · STOC 2013
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.212013
Exponential Lower Bounds for the PPSZ k-SAT Algorithm · SODA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational autoencoder · 0.6stochastic gradient variational bayes · 0.6reparameterization trick · 0.6gaussian mixture model · 0.6optimization · 0.4restricted boltzmann machine · 0.2neural autoregressive distribution estimator · 0.2randomized algorithm · 0.2polynomial calculus resolution · 0.2polynomial calculus · 0.2PPSZ algorithm · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Variational Deep Embedding: An Unsupervised and Generative Approach to Clustering
abstract
Clustering is among the most fundamental tasks in machine learning and artificial intelligence. In this paper, we propose Variational Deep Embedding (VaDE), a novel unsupervised generative clustering approach within the framework of Variational Auto-Encoder (VAE). Specifically, VaDE models the data generative procedure with a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and a deep neural network (DNN): 1) the GMM picks a cluster; 2) from which a latent embedding is generated; 3) then the DNN decodes the latent embedding into an observable. Inference in VaDE is done in a variational way: a different DNN is used to encode observables to latent embeddings, so that the evidence lower bound (ELBO) can be optimized using the Stochastic Gradient Variational Bayes (SGVB) estimator and the reparameterization trick. Quantitative comparisons with strong baselines are included in this paper, and experimental results show that VaDE significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art clustering methods on 5 benchmarks from various modalities. Moreover, by VaDE's generative nature, we show its capability of generating highly realistic samples for any specified cluster, without using supervised information during training.
Zhuxi Jiang, Huachun Tan, Bangsheng Tang, Hanning Zhou
IJCAI4
2016 A Neural Autoregressive Approach to Collaborative Filtering
abstract
This paper proposes CF-NADE, a neural autoregressive architecture for collaborative filtering (CF) tasks, which is inspired by the Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) based CF model and the Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimator (NADE). We first describe the basic CF-NADE model for CF tasks. Then we propose to improve the model by sharing parameters between different ratings. A factored version of CF-NADE is also proposed for better scalability. Furthermore, we take the ordinal nature of the preferences into consideration and propose an ordinal cost to optimize CF-NADE, which shows superior performance. Finally, CF-NADE can be extended to a deep model, with only moderately increased computational complexity. Experimental results show that CF-NADE with a single hidden layer beats all previous state-of-the-art methods on MovieLens 1M, MovieLens 10M, and Netflix datasets, and adding more hidden layers can further improve the performance.
Bangsheng Tang, Wenkui Ding, Hanning Zhou
ICML2
2015 On the Balance of Meter Deployment Cost and NILM Accuracy
Xiaohong Hao, Bangsheng Tang, Yongcai Wang
IJCAI2
2013 Exponential Lower Bounds for the PPSZ k-SAT Algorithm
abstract
In 1998, Paturi, Pudlák, Saks, and Zane presented PPSZ, an elegant randomized algorithm for k-SAT. Fourteen years on, this algorithm is still the fastest known worst-case algorithm. They proved that its expected running time on k-CNF formulas with n variables is at most , where εk ∊ Ω(1/k). So far, no exponential lower bounds at all have been known. In this paper, we construct hard instances for PPSZ. That is, we construct satisfiable k-CNF formulas over n variables on which the expected running time is at least , for εk ∊ O(log2 k/k).
Dominik Scheder, Bangsheng Tang, Shiteng Chen, Navid Talebanfard
SODA2
2013 Some trade-off results for polynomial calculus: extended abstract
abstract
We present size-space trade-offs for the polynomial calculus (PC) and polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) proof systems. These are the first true size-space trade-offs in any algebraic proof system, showing that size and space cannot be simultaneously optimized in these models. We achieve this by extending essentially all known size-space trade-offs for resolution to PC and PCR. As such, our results cover space complexity from constant all the way up to exponential and yield mostly superpolynomial or even exponential size blow-ups. Since the upper bounds in our trade-offs hold for resolution, our work shows that there are formulas for which adding algebraic reasoning on top of resolution does not improve the trade-off properties in any significant way.
Chris Beck, Jakob Nordström, Bangsheng Tang
STOC3
2012 On Isomorphism Testing of Groups with Normal Hall Subgroups
abstract
A normal Hall subgroup N of a group G is a normal subgroup with its order coprime with its index. Schur-Zassenhaus theorem states that every normal Hall subgroup has a complement subgroup, that is a set of coset representatives H which also forms a subgroup of G. In this paper, we present a framework to test isomorphism of groups with at least one normal Hall subgroup, when groups are given as multiplication tables. To establish the framework, we first observe that a proof of Schur-Zassenhaus theorem is constructive, and formulate a necessary and sufficient condition for testing isomorphism in terms of the associated actions of the semidirect products, and isomorphisms of the normal parts and complement parts. We then focus on the case when the normal subgroup is abelian. Utilizing basic facts of representation theory of finite groups and a technique by Le Gall (STACS 2009), we first get an efficient isomorphism testing algorithm when the complement has bounded number of generators. For the case when the complement subgroup is elementary abelian, which does not necessarily have bounded number of generators, we obtain a polynomial time isomorphism testing algorithm by reducing to generalized code isomorphism problem, which asks whether two linear subspaces are the same up to permutation of coordinates. A solution to the latter can be obtained by a mild extension of the singly exponential (in the number of coordinates) time algorithm for code isomorphism problem developed recently by Babai et al. (SODA 2011). Enroute to obtaining the above reduction, we study the following computational problem in representation theory of finite groups: given two representations ρ and τ of a group H over $ \mathbb{Z}_p^d $ , p a prime, determine if there exists an automorphism : H → H, such that the induced representation ρ𝜙 = ρ ◦ 𝜙 and τ are equivalent, in time poly(|H|, p d ).
Youming Qiao, Jayalal Sarma, Bangsheng Tang
J. Comput. Sci. Technol.3
2011 On Isomorphism Testing of Groups with Normal Hall Subgroups
Youming Qiao, Jayalal Sarma, Bangsheng Tang
STACS3